You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Shimik <sh...@gmail.com> on 2008/07/16 16:13:16 UTC
Does multicast transport exist?
Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
unreliable.
According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one might
think it does.
If it does, how can I use it?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18488375.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Does multicast transport exist?
Posted by Shimik <sh...@gmail.com>.
The documentation is misleading. It shouldn't list multicast as one of the
transport protocols and definitely not on the main page.
http://activemq.apache.org/ - Supports pluggable transport protocols such as
in-VM, TCP, SSL, NIO, UDP, multicast, JGroups and JXTA transports.
http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html
Shimi
Joe Fernandez wrote:
>
> The second posting's thread states that reliable multicast is currently on
> the todo list and that JGroups is not an option, because "JGroups is LGPL
> and slow".
>
> Joe
> www.ttmsolutions.com
>
>
>
> Shimik wrote:
>>
>> According to these posts there are others who are looking for the same
>> thing. I can't figure out if it exist or not.
>> http://www.nabble.com/Reliable-Multicast-and-ActiveMQ-td17806853.html
>> http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-configure-Broker-Client-to-use-reliable-UDP-protocol-for-Topics-and-TCP-IP-for-Queues--td17992071.html
>> http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-ConnectionTransport--td18283185.html
>>
>>
>> Maybe someone can shade light on this issue.
>>
>> Shimi
>>
>>
>> David Crisp wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Shimik,
>>> I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2.
>>> When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors
>>> (transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable. My
>>> attempts
>>> to use it have been unsuccessful so far.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>>> Shimik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
>>>> unreliable.
>>>> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one
>>>> might think it does.
>>>> If it does, how can I use it?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18552259.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Does multicast transport exist?
Posted by Joe Fernandez <jo...@ttmsolutions.com>.
The second posting's thread states that reliable multicast is currently on
the todo list and that JGroups is not an option, because "JGroups is LGPL
and slow".
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
Shimik wrote:
>
> According to these posts there are others who are looking for the same
> thing. I can't figure out if it exist or not.
> http://www.nabble.com/Reliable-Multicast-and-ActiveMQ-td17806853.html
> http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-configure-Broker-Client-to-use-reliable-UDP-protocol-for-Topics-and-TCP-IP-for-Queues--td17992071.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-ConnectionTransport--td18283185.html
>
>
> Maybe someone can shade light on this issue.
>
> Shimi
>
>
> David Crisp wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shimik,
>> I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2.
>> When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors
>> (transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable. My attempts
>> to use it have been unsuccessful so far.
>>
>> Good luck,
>> D.
>>
>>
>> Shimik wrote:
>>>
>>> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
>>> unreliable.
>>> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one
>>> might think it does.
>>> If it does, how can I use it?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18496329.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Does multicast transport exist?
Posted by Shimik <sh...@gmail.com>.
According to these posts there are others who are looking for the same thing.
I can't figure out if it exist or not.
http://www.nabble.com/Reliable-Multicast-and-ActiveMQ-td17806853.html
http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-configure-Broker-Client-to-use-reliable-UDP-protocol-for-Topics-and-TCP-IP-for-Queues--td17992071.html
http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-ConnectionTransport--td18283185.html
Maybe someone can shade light on this issue.
Shimi
David Crisp wrote:
>
> Hi Shimik,
> I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2.
> When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors
> (transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable. My attempts
> to use it have been unsuccessful so far.
>
> Good luck,
> D.
>
>
> Shimik wrote:
>>
>> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
>> unreliable.
>> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one
>> might think it does.
>> If it does, how can I use it?
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18494476.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Does multicast transport exist?
Posted by David Crisp <da...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Shimik,
I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2.
When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors
(transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable. My attempts
to use it have been unsuccessful so far.
Good luck,
D.
Shimik wrote:
>
> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or
> unreliable.
> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one might
> think it does.
> If it does, how can I use it?
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18490609.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.