You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Joseph Kulandai <ku...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/15 09:50:40 UTC
Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version
for development?
Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for
development?
I am planning to use Geronimo for development and I would like to know which
version is the latest stable version now? Please help me on this.
Thanks,
Joseph Kulandai.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Version-1.1.1%28Released-September-18%2C-2006%29-the-stable-version-for-development--tf3407031s134.html#a9490506
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
I think this problem is fixed in trunk. See
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2916
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/15/07, Ueberbach, Michael <mi...@dbh.de> wrote:
> I had a little, but nevertheless important problem using 2.0M3 instead of 1.1.1.
> When I tried to migrate to 2.0M3 I couldn't manage to deploy a database pool using the console. This was no problem in 1.1.1.
> Maybe this will be solved in the next milestone?
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: eljotpl@gmail.com [mailto:eljotpl@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Jacek Laskowski
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 11:30
> An: user@geronimo.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
>
> On 3/15/07, Joseph Kulandai <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for
> > development?
> >
> > I am planning to use Geronimo for development and I would like to know
> > which version is the latest stable version now? Please help me on this.
>
> I'm biased so take it with a grain of salt.
>
> I'd say go for Apache Geronimo v2
> (http://geronimo.apache.org/2007/03/08/apache-geronimo-20-m3-released.html)
> that comes with the latest Java EE 5 bits. To me, 1.1.1 is as stable as 2.0M3 and don't be misled 1.1.1 is better (in terms of stability) than 2.0M3 only because of the release number.
>
> There's also the Geronimo Eclipse plugin to help you get started with Java EE 5 and Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html). Download the unofficially official daily driver from. It's listed in the Daily Drivers of the Downloads section. It works with Eclipse IDE 3.3m5eh + WTP 2.0m5.
>
> When in doubt, ask your questions here. There's no better way to learn new stuff than asking about it in public ;-) Also, you may've noticed there's a shortage of 2.0 documentation so your questions and answers are likely to become part of it, too.
>
> Take a look at the website to find out more about Apache Geronimo and report any issues you run into on the user mailing list.
>
> Happy Java EE 5 coding with Apache Geronimo!
>
> Jacek
>
> --
>
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 3/15/07, Ueberbach, Michael <mi...@dbh.de> wrote:
> I had a little, but nevertheless important problem using 2.0M3 instead of 1.1.1.
> When I tried to migrate to 2.0M3 I couldn't manage to deploy a database pool using the console. This was no problem in 1.1.1.
Ah, you're right. I haven't experienced it myself, but saw the issue
rised on the mailing list. It's said that you should be able to deploy
database-related plans from a command line.
> Maybe this will be solved in the next milestone?
But of course! (but don't take my word for it ;-))
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable
version for development?
Posted by ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net>.
I posted an issue and was told that my configuration was wrong because the
daily plugin builds require WTP 2.0 (and I had 1.5.3).
So I fixed my configuration and he plugin works well for setting up and
editing the Geronimo configuration. I have one problem, however. When I try
to start Geronimo from the Servers view, I get the following:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/geronimo/system/main/Daemon
Exception in thread "main"
I have seen others psoting on the web who had the same problem in earlier
versions (around September 2006) but I didn't find an explanation or what to
do.
I tried adding the same classpath I found in geronimo.bet to the launch
configuration but it made no difference. The server runs perfectly fine from
startup.bat/geronimo.bat from the file system.
Any ideas?
Best wishes, Ivan
ibiddles wrote:
>
> Dear Jacek,
>
> Thanks for trying on this. I will post an issue as you suggest.
>
> Best wishes, Ivan.
>
>
> Jacek Laskowski-4 wrote:
>>
>> On 3/21/07, ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The error I'm getting currently when I try to invoke the Deployment PLan
>>> Editor has changed to:
>>>
>>> Problems occurred when invoking code from plugin: "org.eclipse.jface".
>>>
>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/core/resources/IFile
>>
>> I can't help here. I have never seen such an exception and don't have
>> a slightest idea what might've caused that so the only viable solution
>> is to rise an issue in Geronimo Devtools issue report tracker -
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS.
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>> --
>> Jacek Laskowski
>> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Version-1.1.1%28Released-September-18%2C-2006%29-the-stable-version-for-development--tf3407031s134.html#a9679544
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable
version for development?
Posted by ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net>.
Dear Jacek,
Thanks for trying on this. I will post an issue as you suggest.
Best wishes, Ivan.
Jacek Laskowski-4 wrote:
>
> On 3/21/07, ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net> wrote:
>
>> The error I'm getting currently when I try to invoke the Deployment PLan
>> Editor has changed to:
>>
>> Problems occurred when invoking code from plugin: "org.eclipse.jface".
>>
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/core/resources/IFile
>
> I can't help here. I have never seen such an exception and don't have
> a slightest idea what might've caused that so the only viable solution
> is to rise an issue in Geronimo Devtools issue report tracker -
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Version-1.1.1%28Released-September-18%2C-2006%29-the-stable-version-for-development--tf3407031s134.html#a9598130
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 3/21/07, ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net> wrote:
> The error I'm getting currently when I try to invoke the Deployment PLan
> Editor has changed to:
>
> Problems occurred when invoking code from plugin: "org.eclipse.jface".
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/core/resources/IFile
I can't help here. I have never seen such an exception and don't have
a slightest idea what might've caused that so the only viable solution
is to rise an issue in Geronimo Devtools issue report tracker -
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable
version for development?
Posted by ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net>.
Dear Jacek,
The error I'm getting currently when I try to invoke the Deployment PLan
Editor has changed to:
Problems occurred when invoking code from plugin: "org.eclipse.jface".
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/core/resources/IFile
at org.apache.geronimo.st.ui.editors.SharedDeploymentPlanEditor.getLoader
(94)
at
org.apache.geronimo.st.ui.editors.SharedDeploymentPlanEditor.loadDeploymentPlan
(86)
at
org.apache.geronimo.st.ui.editors.AbstractGeronimoDeploymentPlanEditor.init
(18)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.EditorManager.createSite (842)
and the rest are all Eclipse entries. (I am having to type these in so I
don't want to go any further unless I have to).
I have checked my plugins and there is no reason I can see why
org/eclipse/core/resources/IFile should not be found and loaded.
Some other anomalies are that in the server overview, the only entry in the
runtime drop-down is Geronimo v1.1 and if I click on the Edit hyperlink next
to it nothing happens at all.
I will check out the WTP forums as you suggest.
Best wishes, Ivan.
Jacek Laskowski-4 wrote:
>
> On 3/19/07, ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net> wrote:
>
>> You mention that the Eclipse plugin works with 2.0M3, Eclipse 3.3M5eh and
>> WTP 2.0M5. I have to run on 3.2.2 right now because of dependencies of
>> other
>> projects I am using.
>
> That's the configuration I'm using so when asked replied with my
> experiences. Don't know about any other version(s).
>
>> I have Eclipse 3.2.2, WTP1.5.3 and all of its specified dependencies (EMF
>> 3.2.2, GEF 3.2.2 and JEM 1.2.3).. I also have the latest unofficial daily
>> plugin (14-MAR). The problem is that I am getting an "Unhandled event
>> loop
>> exception" and then an NPE at
>> org.eclsipe.ui.internal.presentation.setFocus
>> (line 148) when I try to open the Geronimo deployment plan editor.
>
> I've seen it reported on the Eclipse WTP forum. It can imply that it
> might not relate to the way the plugin works. When you open the
> deployment plan, are you sure you're using Geronimo-specific editor?
> Could you post the whole stack trace?
>
>> Does the latest plugin build support my configuration or do I need to get
>> another plugin version from somewhere?
>
> Don't know.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Version-1.1.1%28Released-September-18%2C-2006%29-the-stable-version-for-development--tf3407031s134.html#a9587290
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 3/19/07, ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net> wrote:
> You mention that the Eclipse plugin works with 2.0M3, Eclipse 3.3M5eh and
> WTP 2.0M5. I have to run on 3.2.2 right now because of dependencies of other
> projects I am using.
That's the configuration I'm using so when asked replied with my
experiences. Don't know about any other version(s).
> I have Eclipse 3.2.2, WTP1.5.3 and all of its specified dependencies (EMF
> 3.2.2, GEF 3.2.2 and JEM 1.2.3).. I also have the latest unofficial daily
> plugin (14-MAR). The problem is that I am getting an "Unhandled event loop
> exception" and then an NPE at org.eclsipe.ui.internal.presentation.setFocus
> (line 148) when I try to open the Geronimo deployment plan editor.
I've seen it reported on the Eclipse WTP forum. It can imply that it
might not relate to the way the plugin works. When you open the
deployment plan, are you sure you're using Geronimo-specific editor?
Could you post the whole stack trace?
> Does the latest plugin build support my configuration or do I need to get
> another plugin version from somewhere?
Don't know.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable
version for development?
Posted by ibiddles <iv...@scientology.net>.
Hi Jacek,
You mention that the Eclipse plugin works with 2.0M3, Eclipse 3.3M5eh and
WTP 2.0M5. I have to run on 3.2.2 right now because of dependencies of other
projects I am using.
I have Eclipse 3.2.2, WTP1.5.3 and all of its specified dependencies (EMF
3.2.2, GEF 3.2.2 and JEM 1.2.3).. I also have the latest unofficial daily
plugin (14-MAR). The problem is that I am getting an "Unhandled event loop
exception" and then an NPE at org.eclsipe.ui.internal.presentation.setFocus
(line 148) when I try to open the Geronimo deployment plan editor.
Does the latest plugin build support my configuration or do I need to get
another plugin version from somewhere?
Best wishes, Ivan.
Jacek Laskowski-4 wrote:
>
> On 3/15/07, Joseph Kulandai <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for
>> development?
>>
>> I am planning to use Geronimo for development and I would like to know
>> which
>> version is the latest stable version now? Please help me on this.
>
> I'm biased so take it with a grain of salt.
>
> I'd say go for Apache Geronimo v2
> (http://geronimo.apache.org/2007/03/08/apache-geronimo-20-m3-released.html)
> that comes with the latest Java EE 5 bits. To me, 1.1.1 is as stable
> as 2.0M3 and don't be misled 1.1.1 is better (in terms of stability)
> than 2.0M3 only because of the release number.
>
> There's also the Geronimo Eclipse plugin to help you get started with
> Java EE 5 and Geronimo
> (http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html). Download the
> unofficially official daily driver from. It's listed in the Daily
> Drivers of the Downloads section. It works with Eclipse IDE 3.3m5eh +
> WTP 2.0m5.
>
> When in doubt, ask your questions here. There's no better way to learn
> new stuff than asking about it in public ;-) Also, you may've noticed
> there's a shortage of 2.0 documentation so your questions and answers
> are likely to become part of it, too.
>
> Take a look at the website to find out more about Apache Geronimo and
> report any issues you run into on the user mailing list.
>
> Happy Java EE 5 coding with Apache Geronimo!
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Version-1.1.1%28Released-September-18%2C-2006%29-the-stable-version-for-development--tf3407031s134.html#a9546386
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
AW: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
Posted by "Ueberbach, Michael" <mi...@dbh.de>.
I had a little, but nevertheless important problem using 2.0M3 instead of 1.1.1.
When I tried to migrate to 2.0M3 I couldn't manage to deploy a database pool using the console. This was no problem in 1.1.1.
Maybe this will be solved in the next milestone?
Regards
Michael
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eljotpl@gmail.com [mailto:eljotpl@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Jacek Laskowski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 11:30
An: user@geronimo.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
On 3/15/07, Joseph Kulandai <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for
> development?
>
> I am planning to use Geronimo for development and I would like to know
> which version is the latest stable version now? Please help me on this.
I'm biased so take it with a grain of salt.
I'd say go for Apache Geronimo v2
(http://geronimo.apache.org/2007/03/08/apache-geronimo-20-m3-released.html)
that comes with the latest Java EE 5 bits. To me, 1.1.1 is as stable as 2.0M3 and don't be misled 1.1.1 is better (in terms of stability) than 2.0M3 only because of the release number.
There's also the Geronimo Eclipse plugin to help you get started with Java EE 5 and Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html). Download the unofficially official daily driver from. It's listed in the Daily Drivers of the Downloads section. It works with Eclipse IDE 3.3m5eh + WTP 2.0m5.
When in doubt, ask your questions here. There's no better way to learn new stuff than asking about it in public ;-) Also, you may've noticed there's a shortage of 2.0 documentation so your questions and answers are likely to become part of it, too.
Take a look at the website to find out more about Apache Geronimo and report any issues you run into on the user mailing list.
Happy Java EE 5 coding with Apache Geronimo!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 3/15/07, Joseph Kulandai <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for
> development?
>
> I am planning to use Geronimo for development and I would like to know which
> version is the latest stable version now? Please help me on this.
I'm biased so take it with a grain of salt.
I'd say go for Apache Geronimo v2
(http://geronimo.apache.org/2007/03/08/apache-geronimo-20-m3-released.html)
that comes with the latest Java EE 5 bits. To me, 1.1.1 is as stable
as 2.0M3 and don't be misled 1.1.1 is better (in terms of stability)
than 2.0M3 only because of the release number.
There's also the Geronimo Eclipse plugin to help you get started with
Java EE 5 and Geronimo
(http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html). Download the
unofficially official daily driver from. It's listed in the Daily
Drivers of the Downloads section. It works with Eclipse IDE 3.3m5eh +
WTP 2.0m5.
When in doubt, ask your questions here. There's no better way to learn
new stuff than asking about it in public ;-) Also, you may've noticed
there's a shortage of 2.0 documentation so your questions and answers
are likely to become part of it, too.
Take a look at the website to find out more about Apache Geronimo and
report any issues you run into on the user mailing list.
Happy Java EE 5 coding with Apache Geronimo!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl