You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@marmotta.apache.org by "Sebastian Schaffert (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/17 11:38:42 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MARMOTTA-77) Implement RFC2296 Content Negotiation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13937646#comment-13937646 ] 

Sebastian Schaffert commented on MARMOTTA-77:
---------------------------------------------

an option to solve this issue is to make use of the RestEasy content negotiation classes, see 

http://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0.6.Final/javadocs/org/jboss/resteasy/core/request/AcceptHeaders.html

> Implement RFC2296 Content Negotiation
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MARMOTTA-77
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-77
>             Project: Marmotta
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Platform, Web Services
>    Affects Versions: 3.1-incubating
>            Reporter: Sebastian Schaffert
>            Assignee: Sebastian Schaffert
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.3
>
>
> The content negotiation in LMFHttpUtils is currently simplified as it takes the first matching content type of the accept header. We should instead more closely follow the RFC2296 and RFC2295:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2296
> and
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2295



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)