You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/13 07:27:40 UTC
[ANN] cobertura-maven-plugin 2.2
The Mojo team is pleased to annouce the release of the cobertura plugin v2.2
.
This release fix some important bugs over the cobertura plugin v2.1 which
was almost unusable for 1 year.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/
The list of changes is :
** Bug
* [MCOBERTURA-37] - Error in documentation for exclude, include and
ignore
* [MCOBERTURA-61] - HTML report shows all 100% but cobertura:check shows
correct coverage - only in 2.1, works in 2.0
* [MCOBERTURA-63] - empty index.html when site is staged.
* [MCOBERTURA-68] - Update maven-cobertura-plugin to use cobertura-1.9
* [MCOBERTURA-71] - Couldn't find 'cobertura' artifact in plugin
dependencies
* [MCOBERTURA-77] - Test failures after upgrade to Cobertura 1.9
** Improvement
* [MCOBERTURA-57] - Workaround for cobertura.ser location
* [MCOBERTURA-60] - Cobertura Plugin: need ability to produce both HTML
and XML report in one go.
Enjoy it.
Cheers,
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................
Re: [ANN] cobertura-maven-plugin 2.2
Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
Superb, many thanks! I know lots of people have been waiting for this one!
Kalle
On 12/12/07, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Mojo team is pleased to annouce the release of the cobertura plugin
> v2.2
> .
> This release fix some important bugs over the cobertura plugin v2.1 which
> was almost unusable for 1 year.
>
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/
>
> The list of changes is :
>
> ** Bug
> * [MCOBERTURA-37] - Error in documentation for exclude, include and
> ignore
> * [MCOBERTURA-61] - HTML report shows all 100% but cobertura:check
> shows
> correct coverage - only in 2.1, works in 2.0
> * [MCOBERTURA-63] - empty index.html when site is staged.
> * [MCOBERTURA-68] - Update maven-cobertura-plugin to use cobertura-1.9
> * [MCOBERTURA-71] - Couldn't find 'cobertura' artifact in plugin
> dependencies
> * [MCOBERTURA-77] - Test failures after upgrade to Cobertura 1.9
>
> ** Improvement
> * [MCOBERTURA-57] - Workaround for cobertura.ser location
> * [MCOBERTURA-60] - Cobertura Plugin: need ability to produce both
> HTML
> and XML report in one go.
>
> Enjoy it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> ..........................................................
> Arnaud HERITIER
> ..........................................................
> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> ..........................................................
> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> ...........................................................
>
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Pedro Viegas <vi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jeff,
Please post back when you have any more news.
Best of luck.
Regards,
On Dec 20, 2007 7:45 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have extended the corbertura-maven-plugin in order to do that but I'm
> facing an issue with the cargo plugin: my cobertura plugin will not
> generate
> a new artifact with a specific classifier (like the clover plugin) but
> when
> the cargo plugin starts a container, it will deploy both artifacts, the
> original one and the one generated with corbertura.
> I need to continue working on it in order to find a solution.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 7:41 PM, Pedro Viegas <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Any more news on this?
> > This is a really important feature.
> > We've been battling on this one for a week ate work.
> >
> > Any workarrounds, any news?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 3:34 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thus you'll have my help ;-)
> > >
> > > On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would prefer extending the current one.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ?
> > > > > otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include
> > > integration
> > > > > tests in reports
> > > > >
> > > > > Arnaud
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Richard,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with
> the
> > > > > current
> > > > > > design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It
> > does
> > > > > only
> > > > > > address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I
> plan
> > to
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the
> > Clover
> > > > > > plugin)
> > > > > > that address this issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <
> > richardbrewster@pqa.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test
> > phase
> > > > of
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run
> > by
> > > > the
> > > > > > > Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the
> > 2.0
> > > > > > > version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the
> upgrade
> > to
> > > > 2.2
> > > > > ).
> > > > > > > I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the
> > > > > expected
> > > > > > > coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the
> > web
> > > > > > > module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the
> war,
> > > for
> > > > > > > one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage
> > > testing
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > be done.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
> > > > > documented
> > > > > > > here, too:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Richard Brewster
> > > > > > > Senior Associate
> > > > > > > Perrin Quarles Associates
> > > > > > > richardbrewster@pqa.com
> > > > > > > (434) 817-2640
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > > > > > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > > > > > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > > > > > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > > > > > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > > > > > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > > > > > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > > > > > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > > > > > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > > > > > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Miossec (2006)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > > > > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ..........................................................
> > > > > Arnaud HERITIER
> > > > > ..........................................................
> > > > > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > > > > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > > > > ..........................................................
> > > > > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > > > > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > > > > ...........................................................
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > > > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > > > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > > > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > > > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > > > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > > > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > > > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > > > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > > > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> > > >
> > > > Miossec (2006)
> > > >
> > > > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ..........................................................
> > > Arnaud HERITIER
> > > ..........................................................
> > > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > > ..........................................................
> > > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > > ...........................................................
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pedro Viegas
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Walking on water and developing software
> > from a specification are easy if both are
> > frozen.
> > - Edward V. Berard
> >
>
>
>
> --
> La mélancolie c'est communiste
> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> Elle se prend même avec des gants
> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
>
> Miossec (2006)
>
> http://www.jeffmaury.com
> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>
--
Pedro Viegas
------------------------------------------------------------
Walking on water and developing software
from a specification are easy if both are
frozen.
- Edward V. Berard
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com>.
Hello,
I have extended the corbertura-maven-plugin in order to do that but I'm
facing an issue with the cargo plugin: my cobertura plugin will not generate
a new artifact with a specific classifier (like the clover plugin) but when
the cargo plugin starts a container, it will deploy both artifacts, the
original one and the one generated with corbertura.
I need to continue working on it in order to find a solution.
Jeff
On Dec 20, 2007 7:41 PM, Pedro Viegas <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Any more news on this?
> This is a really important feature.
> We've been battling on this one for a week ate work.
>
> Any workarrounds, any news?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 3:34 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thus you'll have my help ;-)
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I would prefer extending the current one.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ?
> > > > otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include
> > integration
> > > > tests in reports
> > > >
> > > > Arnaud
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Richard,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the
> > > > current
> > > > > design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It
> does
> > > > only
> > > > > address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan
> to
> > > > work
> > > > > on
> > > > > another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the
> Clover
> > > > > plugin)
> > > > > that address this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <
> richardbrewster@pqa.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test
> phase
> > > of
> > > > a
> > > > > > web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run
> by
> > > the
> > > > > > Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the
> 2.0
> > > > > > version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade
> to
> > > 2.2
> > > > ).
> > > > > > I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the
> > > > expected
> > > > > > coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the
> web
> > > > > > module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war,
> > for
> > > > > > one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage
> > testing
> > > > can
> > > > > > be done.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
> > > > documented
> > > > > > here, too:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Richard Brewster
> > > > > > Senior Associate
> > > > > > Perrin Quarles Associates
> > > > > > richardbrewster@pqa.com
> > > > > > (434) 817-2640
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > > > > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > > > > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > > > > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > > > > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > > > > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > > > > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > > > > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > > > > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > > > > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> > > > >
> > > > > Miossec (2006)
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > > > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ..........................................................
> > > > Arnaud HERITIER
> > > > ..........................................................
> > > > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > > > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > > > ..........................................................
> > > > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > > > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > > > ...........................................................
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> > >
> > > Miossec (2006)
> > >
> > > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ..........................................................
> > Arnaud HERITIER
> > ..........................................................
> > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > ..........................................................
> > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > ...........................................................
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pedro Viegas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Walking on water and developing software
> from a specification are easy if both are
> frozen.
> - Edward V. Berard
>
--
La mélancolie c'est communiste
Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
Elle se prend même avec des gants
La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
Miossec (2006)
http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Pedro Viegas <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi guys,
Any more news on this?
This is a really important feature.
We've been battling on this one for a week ate work.
Any workarrounds, any news?
Thanks,
On Dec 13, 2007 3:34 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thus you'll have my help ;-)
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
>
> > I would prefer extending the current one.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ?
> > > otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include
> integration
> > > tests in reports
> > >
> > > Arnaud
> > >
> > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Richard,
> > > >
> > > > I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the
> > > current
> > > > design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does
> > > only
> > > > address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to
> > > work
> > > > on
> > > > another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
> > > > plugin)
> > > > that address this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase
> > of
> > > a
> > > > > web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by
> > the
> > > > > Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
> > > > > version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to
> > 2.2
> > > ).
> > > > > I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the
> > > expected
> > > > > coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
> > > > > module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war,
> for
> > > > > one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage
> testing
> > > can
> > > > > be done.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
> > > documented
> > > > > here, too:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Richard Brewster
> > > > > Senior Associate
> > > > > Perrin Quarles Associates
> > > > > richardbrewster@pqa.com
> > > > > (434) 817-2640
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > > > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > > > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > > > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > > > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > > > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > > > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > > > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > > > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > > > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> > > >
> > > > Miossec (2006)
> > > >
> > > > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ..........................................................
> > > Arnaud HERITIER
> > > ..........................................................
> > > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > > ..........................................................
> > > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > > ...........................................................
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> >
> > Miossec (2006)
> >
> > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ..........................................................
> Arnaud HERITIER
> ..........................................................
> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> ..........................................................
> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> ...........................................................
>
--
Pedro Viegas
------------------------------------------------------------
Walking on water and developing software
from a specification are easy if both are
frozen.
- Edward V. Berard
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
Thus you'll have my help ;-)
On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> I would prefer extending the current one.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ?
> > otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration
> > tests in reports
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Richard,
> > >
> > > I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the
> > current
> > > design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does
> > only
> > > address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to
> > work
> > > on
> > > another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
> > > plugin)
> > > that address this issue.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase
> of
> > a
> > > > web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by
> the
> > > > Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
> > > > version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to
> 2.2
> > ).
> > > > I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the
> > expected
> > > > coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
> > > > module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
> > > > one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing
> > can
> > > > be done.
> > > >
> > > > http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> > > >
> > > > Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
> > documented
> > > > here, too:
> > > >
> > > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Richard Brewster
> > > > Senior Associate
> > > > Perrin Quarles Associates
> > > > richardbrewster@pqa.com
> > > > (434) 817-2640
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> > >
> > > Miossec (2006)
> > >
> > > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ..........................................................
> > Arnaud HERITIER
> > ..........................................................
> > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > ..........................................................
> > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > ...........................................................
> >
>
>
>
> --
> La mélancolie c'est communiste
> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> Elle se prend même avec des gants
> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
>
> Miossec (2006)
>
> http://www.jeffmaury.com
> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>
--
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com>.
I would prefer extending the current one.
Jeff
On Dec 13, 2007 4:26 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ?
> otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration
> tests in reports
>
> Arnaud
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the
> current
> > design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does
> only
> > address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to
> work
> > on
> > another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
> > plugin)
> > that address this issue.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of
> a
> > > web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
> > > Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
> > > version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2
> ).
> > > I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the
> expected
> > > coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
> > > module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
> > > one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing
> can
> > > be done.
> > >
> > > http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> > >
> > > Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> > >
> > > Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
> documented
> > > here, too:
> > >
> > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Richard Brewster
> > > Senior Associate
> > > Perrin Quarles Associates
> > > richardbrewster@pqa.com
> > > (434) 817-2640
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > La mélancolie c'est communiste
> > Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> > La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> > C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> > La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> > On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> > La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> > Elle se prend même avec des gants
> > La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> > Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> >
> > Miossec (2006)
> >
> > http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ..........................................................
> Arnaud HERITIER
> ..........................................................
> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> ..........................................................
> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> ...........................................................
>
--
La mélancolie c'est communiste
Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
Elle se prend même avec des gants
La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
Miossec (2006)
http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
another cobertura plugin or an extension of the current one ?
otherwise you have my +1 to have the possibility to include integration
tests in reports
Arnaud
On Dec 13, 2007 3:58 PM, Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current
> design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only
> address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work
> on
> another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
> plugin)
> that address this issue.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a
> > web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
> > Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
> > version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2).
> > I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected
> > coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
> > module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
> > one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can
> > be done.
> >
> > http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> >
> > Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> >
> > Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented
> > here, too:
> >
> > http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Richard Brewster
> > Senior Associate
> > Perrin Quarles Associates
> > richardbrewster@pqa.com
> > (434) 817-2640
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> La mélancolie c'est communiste
> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> Elle se prend même avec des gants
> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
>
> Miossec (2006)
>
> http://www.jeffmaury.com
> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>
--
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com>.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Joshua Spiewak <js...@ivyventures.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Looks like an issue was just opened here:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-86
>
> 2. Not sure about Jeff, mine hasn't amounted to anything worth checking
> in,
> and my effort has fallen by the wayside for the past couple of months.
I did not check in my code because I did not have the committer status.
I still need to do more validation because I first developed it with an
intent to use it with Cargo but this one has some problems with classifier.
So I need to build a test POM for the validation.
However, if you need it, I can send the code.
Jeff
>
>
> joseph22 wrote:
> >
> > We have a very similar need. We have an integration-test module that
> has
> > dependencies on other modules containing unit tests and would like to
> have
> > the integration-test module use the instrumented classes from its
> > dependencies to generate a cobertura report. A few questions:
> >
> > 1. Has this issue been logged as a jira bug or task against the plugin?
> > If so, what is the jira number?
> > 2. The work that you or jeff have been doing -- is it checked in
> > anywhere? If so, how could someone check it out.
> >
> > tks
> > Joseph
> >
> >
> > Joshua Spiewak wrote:
> >>
> >> So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover
> >> plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of
> >> CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to "verify", like the Clover
> >> mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase:
> >>
> >> [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin.
> >> Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in
> >> goal: war:war
> >>
> >> Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages
> its
> >> separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo
> >> kicks off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is
> a
> >> shell, and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real
> work.
> >>
> >> Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this
> >> model? What else were you intending?
> >>
> >> I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with
> checking)
> >> is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So
> >> let me know if you need help!
> >>
> >> -- Josh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jeff MAURY wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Richard,
> >>>
> >>> I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the
> >>> current
> >>> design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does
> >>> only
> >>> address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to
> >>> work on
> >>> another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
> >>> plugin)
> >>> that address this issue.
> >>>
> >>> Jeff
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of
> a
> >>>> web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
> >>>> Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
> >>>> version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to
> >>>> 2.2).
> >>>> I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the
> expected
> >>>> coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
> >>>> module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
> >>>> one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing
> can
> >>>> be done.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
> >>>> documented
> >>>> here, too:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Richard Brewster
> >>>> Senior Associate
> >>>> Perrin Quarles Associates
> >>>> richardbrewster@pqa.com
> >>>> (434) 817-2640
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> La mélancolie c'est communiste
> >>> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> >>> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> >>> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> >>> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> >>> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> >>> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> >>> Elle se prend même avec des gants
> >>> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> >>> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
> >>>
> >>> Miossec (2006)
> >>>
> >>> http://www.jeffmaury.com
> >>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p15865771.html
> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
La mélancolie c'est communiste
Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
Elle se prend même avec des gants
La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
Miossec (2006)
http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with
cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Joshua Spiewak <js...@ivyventures.net>.
1. Looks like an issue was just opened here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-86
2. Not sure about Jeff, mine hasn't amounted to anything worth checking in,
and my effort has fallen by the wayside for the past couple of months.
joseph22 wrote:
>
> We have a very similar need. We have an integration-test module that has
> dependencies on other modules containing unit tests and would like to have
> the integration-test module use the instrumented classes from its
> dependencies to generate a cobertura report. A few questions:
>
> 1. Has this issue been logged as a jira bug or task against the plugin?
> If so, what is the jira number?
> 2. The work that you or jeff have been doing -- is it checked in
> anywhere? If so, how could someone check it out.
>
> tks
> Joseph
>
>
> Joshua Spiewak wrote:
>>
>> So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover
>> plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of
>> CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to "verify", like the Clover
>> mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase:
>>
>> [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin.
>> Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in
>> goal: war:war
>>
>> Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its
>> separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo
>> kicks off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a
>> shell, and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work.
>>
>> Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this
>> model? What else were you intending?
>>
>> I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking)
>> is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So
>> let me know if you need help!
>>
>> -- Josh
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff MAURY wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the
>>> current
>>> design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does
>>> only
>>> address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to
>>> work on
>>> another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
>>> plugin)
>>> that address this issue.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a
>>>> web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
>>>> Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
>>>> version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to
>>>> 2.2).
>>>> I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected
>>>> coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
>>>> module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
>>>> one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can
>>>> be done.
>>>>
>>>> http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
>>>>
>>>> Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be
>>>> documented
>>>> here, too:
>>>>
>>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Richard Brewster
>>>> Senior Associate
>>>> Perrin Quarles Associates
>>>> richardbrewster@pqa.com
>>>> (434) 817-2640
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> La mélancolie c'est communiste
>>> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
>>> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
>>> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
>>> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
>>> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
>>> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
>>> Elle se prend même avec des gants
>>> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
>>> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
>>>
>>> Miossec (2006)
>>>
>>> http://www.jeffmaury.com
>>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p15865771.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with
cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by joseph22 <yu...@gmail.com>.
We have a very similar need. We have an integration-test module that has
dependencies on other modules containing unit tests and would like to have
the integration-test module use the instrumented classes from its
dependencies to generate a cobertura report. A few questions:
1. Has this issue been logged as a jira bug or task against the plugin? If
so, what is the jira number?
2. The work that you or jeff have been doing -- is it checked in anywhere?
If so, how could someone check it out.
tks
Joseph
Joshua Spiewak wrote:
>
> So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover
> plugin to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of
> CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to "verify", like the Clover
> mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase:
>
> [INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin.
> Reason: ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in
> goal: war:war
>
> Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its
> separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo kicks
> off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a shell,
> and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work.
>
> Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this
> model? What else were you intending?
>
> I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking)
> is that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So
> let me know if you need help!
>
> -- Josh
>
>
>
> Jeff MAURY wrote:
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current
>> design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only
>> address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work
>> on
>> another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
>> plugin)
>> that address this issue.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a
>>> web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
>>> Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
>>> version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2).
>>> I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected
>>> coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
>>> module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
>>> one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can
>>> be done.
>>>
>>> http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
>>>
>>> Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
>>>
>>> Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented
>>> here, too:
>>>
>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Richard Brewster
>>> Senior Associate
>>> Perrin Quarles Associates
>>> richardbrewster@pqa.com
>>> (434) 817-2640
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> La mélancolie c'est communiste
>> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
>> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
>> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
>> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
>> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
>> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
>> Elle se prend même avec des gants
>> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
>> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
>>
>> Miossec (2006)
>>
>> http://www.jeffmaury.com
>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p15836604.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with
cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Joshua Spiewak <js...@ivyventures.net>.
So in a simplistic attempt to get this to work, I looked at the Clover plugin
to see what it did. I tried changing the execute phase of
CoberturaCheckMojo and CoberturaReportMojo to "verify", like the Clover
mojos of the same function. This fails in the package phase:
[INFO] Error configuring: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin. Reason:
ERROR: Cannot override read-only parameter: classesDirectory in goal:
war:war
Looking at the Clover plugin a little more, it looks like it manages its
separate lifecycle a little differently and only the instrument mojo kicks
off the separate lifecycle. And in fact, the instrument mojo is a shell,
and there is an internal instrument mojo that does the real work.
Do you think that the Cobertura mojo can be incrementally moved to this
model? What else were you intending?
I would love to get this working, as having code coverage (with checking) is
that last step in converting our main project from Ant to Maven. So let me
know if you need help!
-- Josh
Jeff MAURY wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current
> design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only
> address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work
> on
> another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover
> plugin)
> that address this issue.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a
>> web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
>> Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
>> version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2).
>> I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected
>> coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
>> module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
>> one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can
>> be done.
>>
>> http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
>>
>> Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
>>
>> Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented
>> here, too:
>>
>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Richard Brewster
>> Senior Associate
>> Perrin Quarles Associates
>> richardbrewster@pqa.com
>> (434) 817-2640
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> La mélancolie c'est communiste
> Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
> La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
> C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
> La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
> On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
> La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
> Elle se prend même avec des gants
> La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
> Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
>
> Miossec (2006)
>
> http://www.jeffmaury.com
> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--cobertura-maven-plugin-2.2-tp14310731s177p14826260.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by Jeff MAURY <je...@jeffmaury.com>.
Richard,
I have the same problem and I think this is not feasible with the current
design of the Cobertura Maven2 plugin design as it is today. It does only
address the test phase and not the integration-test phase. I plan to work on
another Cobertura plugin (inspired from the philosophy of the Clover plugin)
that address this issue.
Jeff
On Dec 13, 2007 3:29 PM, Brewster, Richard <ri...@pqa.com> wrote:
> I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a
> web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
> Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
> version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2).
> I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected
> coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
> module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
> one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can
> be done.
>
> http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
>
> Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
>
> Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented
> here, too:
>
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard Brewster
> Senior Associate
> Perrin Quarles Associates
> richardbrewster@pqa.com
> (434) 817-2640
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
La mélancolie c'est communiste
Tout le monde y a droit de temps en temps
La mélancolie n'est pas capitaliste
C'est même gratuit pour les perdants
La mélancolie c'est pacifiste
On ne lui rentre jamais dedans
La mélancolie oh tu sais ça existe
Elle se prend même avec des gants
La mélancolie c'est pour les syndicalistes
Il faut juste sa carte de permanent
Miossec (2006)
http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
Coverage report of web application integration test with cobertura-maven-plugin
Posted by "Brewster, Richard" <ri...@pqa.com>.
I want to produce a coverage report for the integration test phase of a
web application (war packaging). My integration tests are run by the
Cargo maven plugin launching JBoss 4.0.5. I've been using the 2.0
version of the cobertura-maven-plugin (and will try the upgrade to 2.2).
I have a modular project with core and web modules. I get the expected
coverage reports for my core module, but zero coverage for the web
module. The instrumented classes are not packaged into the war, for
one. According to the Cobertura FAQ, this sort of coverage testing can
be done.
http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/faq.html
Has anyone done this? Any advice would be appreciated!
Also, it would be great if integration test coverage could be documented
here, too:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html
Thanks,
Richard Brewster
Senior Associate
Perrin Quarles Associates
richardbrewster@pqa.com
(434) 817-2640
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org