tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Cliff Woolley <jw...@virginia.edu>]

I know it's got a few more patches I need to get in before it's ready to
go, but just so that I could go ahead and at least get started on this
(using some extended definition of "tomorrow" which technically ended
about 24 hrs ago, sigh)... I've tagged apr, apr-util, and apr-iconv as
JCW_0_9_5_PRE1.

Let me know if you have specific things you want to see in 0.9.5 (that are
doable in say a day's time... nothing more than that).

--Cliff

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Joe Orton <jo...@manyfish.co.uk>]

On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 01:36:12PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> Greg modified to install into include/apr-0 some time ago.  Good in theory.
> 
> However, what are applications expected to do w.r.t. that include tree?
> If they are installed systemwide in /usr/include/apr-0 or /usr/local/include/apr-0
> then do we expect the user to be able to #include "apr-0/apr_foo.h"?

You do "#include <apr_foo.h>" in your application and build using
`apr-config --includes --cflags ...`.

joe

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Klaus Keppler <kl...@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de>]

>>Actually I experience some problems when building APR under FreeBSD 5.0
>>with thread support (some problems with atomic variables) - as soon as I
>>know more I'll tell here. :-)
> Patch is already available and in Bugzilla:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26818

Very fine - saved me a lot of time :-)

> It would be nice to resolve this before 0.9.5 is pushed out.  I think
> this is a showstopper bug that FreeBSD has been patching in the Ports
> System for months, why can't APR pick it up?

+1

IMHO all outstanding patches should be applied - or at least be
discussed.

    Klaus

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 02:26, Klaus Keppler wrote:
> Actually I experience some problems when building APR under FreeBSD 5.0
> with thread support (some problems with atomic variables) - as soon as I
> know more I'll tell here. :-)
> 
> Klaus
> 

Patch is already available and in Bugzilla:

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26818

It would be nice to resolve this before 0.9.5 is pushed out.  I think
this is a showstopper bug that FreeBSD has been patching in the Ports
System for months, why can't APR pick it up?

-Paul Querna

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Klaus Keppler <kl...@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de>]

At 12:36 AM 3/15/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>Let me know if you have specific things you want to see in 0.9.5 (that are
>doable in say a day's time... nothing more than that).

What about the open bugs at bugzilla with attached patches?
Especially I'm thinking on #27654 (WIN32 bug with apr_thread_cond_wait)
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27654

Actually I experience some problems when building APR under FreeBSD 5.0
with thread support (some problems with atomic variables) - as soon as I
know more I'll tell here. :-)

Klaus

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

At 12:36 AM 3/15/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:

>Let me know if you have specific things you want to see in 0.9.5 (that are
>doable in say a day's time... nothing more than that).

Ok, after playing in an entirely-seperate build of apr, apr-util, and finally
httpd, I came across something that disturbs me on Unix.

Greg modified to install into include/apr-0 some time ago.  Good in theory.

However, what are applications expected to do w.r.t. that include tree?
If they are installed systemwide in /usr/include/apr-0 or /usr/local/include/apr-0
then do we expect the user to be able to #include "apr-0/apr_foo.h"?

If we do, the current environment is borked.  Our individual include files
have their own #include "apr.h" and other sub-includes, which are altogether
broken if the user follows the #include "apr-0/apr_foo.h" model.

Comments, observations, thoughts?

Bill

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Craig Rodrigues <ro...@crodrigues.org>]

Hi,

Are there any issues which would prevent an APR 0.9.5 release?

If possible, I would like to contribute some of the configury patches
I have against APR 0.9.4 for FreeBSD threads.

Thanks.
 
-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
http://crodrigues.org
rodrigc@crodrigues.org

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Cliff Woolley <jw...@virginia.edu>]

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote:

> if you could take a look at this
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550

Noted, thanks!

Re: tagged 0.9.5 pre1

[Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>]

> Let me know if you have specific things you want to see in 0.9.5 (that are
> doable in say a day's time... nothing more than that).

if you could take a look at this

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550

it would be great.  there's no diff-generated patch but the change is shown
and is a simple one.  I'll generate a diff if you like, but somebody who
understands the other associated foo would need to review it anyway...

thanks :)

--Geoff