You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> on 2005/02/01 21:18:59 UTC
Re: article draft - Summary of benchmark
I've updated the document with more charts from the excel spreadsheet
and tried to make the explanations more clear.
peter
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:20:11 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/benchmark_summary.doc
> http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/benchmark_summary.sxw
> http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/tc_results.html
>
> I've finished a complete draft of the benchmark results. If you have
> any feedback, please email me directly. thanks in advance.
>
>
> peter lin
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: article draft - Summary of benchmark
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:59 -0500, Peter Lin <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've updated the document with more charts from the excel spreadsheet
> and tried to make the explanations more clear.
I'm really interested in the part of your tests which show certain new
CPU architectures showing a big improvement in Java. I suppose it
benefits a lot from large caches (Pentium M, Opteron), and I suppose
more regirsters won't hurt either (x86-64).
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rémy Maucherat
Developer & Consultant
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org