You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Cliff Skolnick <cl...@organic.com> on 1996/05/22 01:55:33 UTC
(fwd) Re: Apache vs Netscape Commerce Server
>From the bsdi newsgroup.
Path: re.hotwired.com!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!brighton.openmarket.com!decwrl!pagesat.net!news.cheetah.net!usenet
From: support@cheetah.net (Shawn Saunders)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc
Subject: Re: Apache vs Netscape Commerce Server
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 17:17:00 GMT
Organization: Cheetah Communications International
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <31...@206.13.95.227>
References: <4n...@news2.cais.com>
Reply-To: support@cheetah.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.13.95.228
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182
On 17 May 1996 13:46:59 GMT, ganesh <ga...@gcol.com> wrote:
>Has anyone used the Netscape commerce server with BSDI? We're
>currently using the Apache server included with BSDI 2.1 and wish
>to use a secure server.
>
>One option is to get the Apache SSL upgrade and recompile, or to go
>with Netscape Commerce server. What are the trade offs involved?
>
We just migrated from the Apache Server that came with BSDI2.1. With
Apache our average load with only 4 minimum and 32 Max hosts running
was .70. While with Netscape and several virtual servers and 16 Min -
32 Max each, our average load is .09
Seems to be running much faster, as-well-as the configuation and
changes via the administrator is quicker and easier.
Just MHO.
Shawn
saunders@cheetah.net
--
--
Cliff Skolnick cliff@organic.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759