You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Matthias J. Sax (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/01/14 17:15:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-14624) State restoration is broken with standby tasks and cache-enabled stores in processor API

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17676934#comment-17676934 ] 

Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-14624:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks for reporting this issue – will need to think about the details more (and look into you project that reproduces it) – my first reaction was, "why is the cache not empty"? Registering the call-back on the cache might introduce a lot of overhead during restore, and thus, I have doubts if it's a good fix.
{quote}If a partition moves from instance 1 to 2 and then back to instance 1
{quote}
If the task/partition moves from 1 to 2, the task on one should be closed and the cache should be gone? Or are you saying the task on instance 1 becomes a standby?

> State restoration is broken with standby tasks and cache-enabled stores in processor API
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-14624
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14624
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: streams
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.1
>            Reporter: Balaji Rao
>            Priority: Major
>
> I found that cache-enabled state stores in PAPI with standby tasks sometimes returns stale data when a partition moves from one app instance to another and back. [Here's|https://github.com/balajirrao/kafka-streams-multi-runner] a small project that I used to reproduce the issue.
> I dug around a bit and it seems like it's a bug in standby task state restoration when caching is enabled. If a partition moves from instance 1 to 2 and then back to instance 1,  since the `CachingKeyValueStore` doesn't register a restore callback, it can return potentially stale data for non-dirty keys. 
> I could fix the issue by modifying the `CachingKeyValueStore` to register a restore callback in which the cache restored keys are added to the cache. Is this fix in the right direction?
> {code:java}
>         // register the store
>         context.register(
>                 root,
>                 (RecordBatchingStateRestoreCallback) records -> {
>                     for (final ConsumerRecord<byte[], byte[]> record : records) {
>                         put(Bytes.wrap(record.key()), record.value());
>                     }
>                 }
>         );
> {code}
>  
> I would like to contribute a fix, if I can get some help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)