You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by ba...@apache.org on 2008/07/13 00:46:58 UTC
svn commit: r676248 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk:
docs/legal/resolved.html xdocs/legal/resolved.xml
Author: bayard
Date: Sat Jul 12 15:46:58 2008
New Revision: 676248
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676248&view=rev
Log:
Adding a resolution regarding Yahoo DomainKeys - LEGAL-22
Modified:
infrastructure/site/trunk/docs/legal/resolved.html
infrastructure/site/trunk/xdocs/legal/resolved.xml
Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/docs/legal/resolved.html
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/docs/legal/resolved.html?rev=676248&r1=676247&r2=676248&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- infrastructure/site/trunk/docs/legal/resolved.html (original)
+++ infrastructure/site/trunk/docs/legal/resolved.html Sat Jul 12 15:46:58 2008
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@
party license when it is put in the jar, assuming that a note that this has occurred is included in the
prominent labeling that the Category B language calls for. </p>
<p>* <b>Can Cobertura reports be included in Apache distributions?</b></p>
-<p>Yes</p>
+<p>Yes. </p>
<p>* <b>Does it matter what platform an Apache product is created to work with?</b></p>
<p>It does not matter, unless the terms for that platform affect
the Apache product's licensing. For example, creating a product that
@@ -222,6 +222,8 @@
depend on the licensing of said code. Also, if you have any doubts as to whether the licensing
of the platform would affect the Apache code, we recommend that you check the legal-discuss@
archives to see if it has come up before, and if not email legal-discuss@ to find out. </p>
+<p>* <b>Does the Yahoo! DomainKeys Patent License Agreement v1.2 raise any concerns?</b></p>
+<p>No. </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/xdocs/legal/resolved.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/xdocs/legal/resolved.xml?rev=676248&r1=676247&r2=676248&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- infrastructure/site/trunk/xdocs/legal/resolved.xml (original)
+++ infrastructure/site/trunk/xdocs/legal/resolved.xml Sat Jul 12 15:46:58 2008
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
<p>* <b>Can Cobertura reports be included in Apache distributions?</b></p>
- <p>Yes</p>
+ <p>Yes. </p>
<p>* <b>Does it matter what platform an Apache product is created to work with?</b></p>
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@
of the platform would affect the Apache code, we recommend that you check the legal-discuss@
archives to see if it has come up before, and if not email legal-discuss@ to find out. </p>
+ <p>* <b>Does the Yahoo! DomainKeys Patent License Agreement v1.2 raise any concerns?</b></p>
+
+ <p>No. </p>
+
</section>
</section>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org