You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Rob Hartill <ro...@imdb.com> on 1996/09/29 12:43:21 UTC
WWW Form Bug Report: "" on OTHER:? (fwd)
Brian?
----- Forwarded message from chip76@ix.netcom.com -----
Message-Id: <19...@taz.hyperreal.com>
From: chip76@ix.netcom.com
To: apache-bugs%apache.org@organic.com
Date: Sat Sep 28 20:54:07 1996
Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "" on OTHER:?
Submitter: chip76@ix.netcom.com
Operating system: OTHER:?, version: ?
Version of Apache Used: 1.1.1
Extra Modules used:
URL exhibiting problem:
Symptoms:
--
I came across a request for support. The problem seems to fit this description from the known bugs list. Has it been fixed? Are there practical workarounds?
4.BSDI problems: One of the test machines (Hyperreal) has noticed "flocks" of child processes sucking up large
amounts of resources when moderately hit (on a Pentium 90 running 1.1 serving ~2 hits/second). Killing and
restarting the daemon helps this disappear - it's being investigated, it might be a kernel bug, but then every server
developer likes to say that. Let us know how well it works for you if you are using BSDI and have a high number of
hits.
--
Backtrace:
--
--
----- End of forwarded message from chip76@ix.netcom.com -----
--
Rob Hartill (robh@imdb.com)
http://www.imdb.com/ ... why wait for a clear night to see the stars?.
Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "" on OTHER:? (fwd)
Posted by Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>.
I haven't seen this happen in a long while.
We should clean up the "known bugs" page.
Brian
On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, Rob Hartill wrote:
> Brian?
>
> ----- Forwarded message from chip76@ix.netcom.com -----
>
> Message-Id: <19...@taz.hyperreal.com>
> From: chip76@ix.netcom.com
> To: apache-bugs%apache.org@organic.com
> Date: Sat Sep 28 20:54:07 1996
> Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "" on OTHER:?
>
> Submitter: chip76@ix.netcom.com
> Operating system: OTHER:?, version: ?
> Version of Apache Used: 1.1.1
> Extra Modules used:
> URL exhibiting problem:
>
> Symptoms:
> --
> I came across a request for support. The problem seems to fit this description from the known bugs list. Has it been fixed? Are there practical workarounds?
>
> 4.BSDI problems: One of the test machines (Hyperreal) has noticed "flocks" of child processes sucking up large
> amounts of resources when moderately hit (on a Pentium 90 running 1.1 serving ~2 hits/second). Killing and
> restarting the daemon helps this disappear - it's being investigated, it might be a kernel bug, but then every server
> developer likes to say that. Let us know how well it works for you if you are using BSDI and have a high number of
> hits.
> --
>
> Backtrace:
> --
>
> --
>
> ----- End of forwarded message from chip76@ix.netcom.com -----
>
> --
> Rob Hartill (robh@imdb.com)
> http://www.imdb.com/ ... why wait for a clear night to see the stars?.
>
>
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com www.apache.org hyperreal.com http://www.organic.com/JOBS