Apollo selector vs. STOMP header fields

[Lionel Cons <li...@cern.ch>]

Hiram,

I've tested the message selectors in Apollo and they seem to work fine for
some header fields. However, they seem to fail with fields containing a
dash. What I see is identical to what is seen in ActiveMQ, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3355.

Are header fields containing a dash supposed to work with Apollo's
selectors?

FWIW, some interesting STOMP fields do contain a dash, for instance
content-length or content-type...

Cheers,

Lionel

Re: Apollo selector vs. STOMP header fields

[Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>]

Yeah.. we started off with the same selector parser so we will end up
with the same issues.  I've opened up:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APLO-59

Regards,
Hiram

FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/




On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Lionel Cons <li...@cern.ch> wrote:
> Hiram,
>
> I've tested the message selectors in Apollo and they seem to work fine for
> some header fields. However, they seem to fail with fields containing a
> dash. What I see is identical to what is seen in ActiveMQ, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3355.
>
> Are header fields containing a dash supposed to work with Apollo's
> selectors?
>
> FWIW, some interesting STOMP fields do contain a dash, for instance
> content-length or content-type...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lionel
>