JCR-2598 [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 1.6.3]

[Vidar Ramdal <vi...@idium.no>]

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejackrabbit-096/
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 1.6.3. The
> vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
>    [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 1.6.3
>    [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Here's my +1.

One question: JCR-2598 [1] is marked as 'fixed' for JR 1.6.3, but
there does not seem to be any related commits to that branch.

The last comment says: "Merged to the 2.0 branch in revision 982274.
I'll take a look at backporting this also to 1.6.3".

So, is this issue yet fixed for 1.6.3?

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2598

-- 
Vidar S. Ramdal <vi...@idium.no> - http://www.idium.no
Sommerrogata 13-15, N-0255 Oslo, Norway
+ 47 22 00 84 00 / +47 22 00 84 76
Quando omni flunkus moritatus!

Re: JCR-2598 [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 1.6.3]

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Vidar Ramdal <vi...@idium.no> wrote:
> One question: JCR-2598 [1] is marked as 'fixed' for JR 1.6.3, but
> there does not seem to be any related commits to that branch.
>
> The last comment says: "Merged to the 2.0 branch in revision 982274.
> I'll take a look at backporting this also to 1.6.3".
>
> So, is this issue yet fixed for 1.6.3?

Hmm, I must have dropped that ball when preparing the release. You're
right in that the fix is not included in 1.6.3.

I guess we should cancel the 1.6.3 release and go for 1.6.4 with this
fix included.

BR,

Jukka Zitting