You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> on 2007/12/14 02:04:10 UTC

Re: ruby failure

Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Peter Samuelson]
>> I get two failures in the ruby bindings, using ruby 1.8.6.111.
> 
> Fixed in trunk r26071; please backport this.  I don't know if it's
> worth rerolling the 1.4.6 tarball for.

Hmm, I don't know either.

Joe, how do you feel about this?  (And, if needed, could you nominate it
for backport?)

-Hyrum


Re: ruby failure

Posted by Joe Swatosh <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,

On Dec 13, 2007 6:04 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > [Peter Samuelson]
> >> I get two failures in the ruby bindings, using ruby 1.8.6.111.
> >
> > Fixed in trunk r26071; please backport this.  I don't know if it's
> > worth rerolling the 1.4.6 tarball for.
>
> Hmm, I don't know either.
>
> Joe, how do you feel about this?  (And, if needed, could you nominate it
> for backport?)
>

I'm not sure.  I think if its important kou should nominate it.  I can't run the
ruby bindings from 1.4.x so I'd have no way of validating the backport.

--
Joe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org