You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> on 2007/12/14 02:04:10 UTC
Re: ruby failure
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Peter Samuelson]
>> I get two failures in the ruby bindings, using ruby 1.8.6.111.
>
> Fixed in trunk r26071; please backport this. I don't know if it's
> worth rerolling the 1.4.6 tarball for.
Hmm, I don't know either.
Joe, how do you feel about this? (And, if needed, could you nominate it
for backport?)
-Hyrum
Re: ruby failure
Posted by Joe Swatosh <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
On Dec 13, 2007 6:04 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > [Peter Samuelson]
> >> I get two failures in the ruby bindings, using ruby 1.8.6.111.
> >
> > Fixed in trunk r26071; please backport this. I don't know if it's
> > worth rerolling the 1.4.6 tarball for.
>
> Hmm, I don't know either.
>
> Joe, how do you feel about this? (And, if needed, could you nominate it
> for backport?)
>
I'm not sure. I think if its important kou should nominate it. I can't run the
ruby bindings from 1.4.x so I'd have no way of validating the backport.
--
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org