You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Scott Deboy <sc...@gmail.com> on 2012/08/06 03:20:10 UTC
Log4j2 core test dependency on 1.2.16?
All (especially Ralph),
I'm going through what it will take to get extras, receivers and Chainsaw
over to log4j2. It's going to be a lot of work. I'm sure there are also
some missing pieces we'll need to work through, but I need to do it now
while log4j2 is alpha. I may give up on Chainsaw being a log4j2 thing. We
shall see.
The first thing I saw was a test dependency in core on log4j 1.2.16. It
seems log4j2 should depend on nothing from log4j (1). Is this something
you can remove?
There will be many more posts, will try not to flood the list.
Scott
Re: Log4j2 core test dependency on 1.2.16?
Posted by Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org>.
Yes
Ralph
On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't the dependency be updated to 1.2.17?
>
> Gary
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 0:03, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> The test dependency is there because there are a few classes that test the performance of Log4j 1.x vs Log4j 2 vs Logback. The test dependencies could be removed but then those classes would have to go to some other sub-project.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
>>
>>> All (especially Ralph),
>>>
>>> I'm going through what it will take to get extras, receivers and Chainsaw over to log4j2. It's going to be a lot of work. I'm sure there are also some missing pieces we'll need to work through, but I need to do it now while log4j2 is alpha. I may give up on Chainsaw being a log4j2 thing. We shall see.
>>>
>>> The first thing I saw was a test dependency in core on log4j 1.2.16. It seems log4j2 should depend on nothing from log4j (1). Is this something you can remove?
>>>
>>> There will be many more posts, will try not to flood the list.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Log4j2 core test dependency on 1.2.16?
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Shouldn't the dependency be updated to 1.2.17?
Gary
On Aug 6, 2012, at 0:03, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> The test dependency is there because there are a few classes that test the performance of Log4j 1.x vs Log4j 2 vs Logback. The test dependencies could be removed but then those classes would have to go to some other sub-project.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Aug 5, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
>
>> All (especially Ralph),
>>
>> I'm going through what it will take to get extras, receivers and Chainsaw over to log4j2. It's going to be a lot of work. I'm sure there are also some missing pieces we'll need to work through, but I need to do it now while log4j2 is alpha. I may give up on Chainsaw being a log4j2 thing. We shall see.
>>
>> The first thing I saw was a test dependency in core on log4j 1.2.16. It seems log4j2 should depend on nothing from log4j (1). Is this something you can remove?
>>
>> There will be many more posts, will try not to flood the list.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Log4j2 core test dependency on 1.2.16?
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
The test dependency is there because there are a few classes that test the performance of Log4j 1.x vs Log4j 2 vs Logback. The test dependencies could be removed but then those classes would have to go to some other sub-project.
Ralph
On Aug 5, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> All (especially Ralph),
>
> I'm going through what it will take to get extras, receivers and Chainsaw over to log4j2. It's going to be a lot of work. I'm sure there are also some missing pieces we'll need to work through, but I need to do it now while log4j2 is alpha. I may give up on Chainsaw being a log4j2 thing. We shall see.
>
> The first thing I saw was a test dependency in core on log4j 1.2.16. It seems log4j2 should depend on nothing from log4j (1). Is this something you can remove?
>
> There will be many more posts, will try not to flood the list.
>
> Scott
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org