You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@libcloud.apache.org by Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org> on 2010/04/26 22:54:30 UTC
[libcloud] 0.3.x status
original goals thread started here:
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-libcloud/201002.mbox/%3C4239a4321002101650i2f995fd1gb1d6b1308ab9a39e@mail.gmail.com%3E>
What we have in or almost in trunk compared to 0.2.x:
- deploy_node working well
- new drivers:
- Softlayer
- ECP
- IBM Dev Cloud (patch in progress)
- Eucalyptus
- improved test cases (love the new fixture files)
- many misc bug fixes.
What I'd like to do to ship 0.3.0:
- Finish IBM driver support
- Finalize extension API standards for drivers.
- Add a tutorial to the website
Anything I'm missing to make a solid 0.3?
I think looking at that list, deploy node has the most significant
impact on users of the library, making the boot strapping process
between different providers much more seamless, letting tools built on
top have a consistent method of getting into the servers after
booting.
Thanks,
Paul
Re: [libcloud] 0.3.x status
Posted by Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org>.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Daniel Molina Aranda
<da...@pdi.ucm.es> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I changed the things you mentioned in JIRA. Anything else pending to get the
> OpenNebula driver included in the release?
OpenNebula driver is in :-)
Only remaining issues that I see:
- Adding DreamHost driver
- Voxel create_node support was forgotten after 0.2, still needs
fixing <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIBCLOUD-23>
I think the Dream Host driver is close, and Jeremy has taken point on
looking at the patch.
I've spent a good portion of today cleaning up and adding doc strings
to lots of classes, and I think we are getting very close to a great
0.3 release.
Ideally I would like to try to start a vote on Wednesday night for
0.3.0. Does anyone think this will be a problem?
Also as part of 0.3.0, I'd like to make sure we can submit the package
to PyPi, so things like easy_install work for everyone.
Thanks,
Paul
Re: [libcloud] 0.3.x status
Posted by Daniel Molina Aranda <da...@pdi.ucm.es>.
Hi Paul,
I changed the things you mentioned in JIRA. Anything else pending to get the
OpenNebula driver included in the release?
Thanks.
On 27 April 2010 21:04, Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Daniel Molina Aranda
> <da...@pdi.ucm.es> wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I am looking at the new included drivers and I am wondering if the
> > OpenNebula driver could be included in the 0,3.x release. The driver was
> > uploaded two weeks ago to JIRA and the required tests were included in
> the
> > patch. If there is something wrong in the way I uploaded it or you need
> me
> > to change anything else, just let me know.
>
> Yes, we should definitely include OpenNebula in the release, I was
> just terrible at remembering everything that is in Jira!
>
> I'll try to do a first pass review on the patch today.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
--
Daniel Molina, Cloud Technology Engineer/Researcher
DSA Research Group: web http://dsa-research.org and blog
http://blog.dsa-research.org
OpenNebula Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing:
http://www.OpenNebula.org
Re: [libcloud] 0.3.x status
Posted by Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org>.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Daniel Molina Aranda
<da...@pdi.ucm.es> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I am looking at the new included drivers and I am wondering if the
> OpenNebula driver could be included in the 0,3.x release. The driver was
> uploaded two weeks ago to JIRA and the required tests were included in the
> patch. If there is something wrong in the way I uploaded it or you need me
> to change anything else, just let me know.
Yes, we should definitely include OpenNebula in the release, I was
just terrible at remembering everything that is in Jira!
I'll try to do a first pass review on the patch today.
Thanks,
Paul
Re: [libcloud] 0.3.x status
Posted by Daniel Molina Aranda <da...@pdi.ucm.es>.
Hi Paul,
I am looking at the new included drivers and I am wondering if the
OpenNebula driver could be included in the 0,3.x release. The driver was
uploaded two weeks ago to JIRA and the required tests were included in the
patch. If there is something wrong in the way I uploaded it or you need me
to change anything else, just let me know.
Thanks.
On 26 April 2010 22:54, Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org> wrote:
> original goals thread started here:
> <
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-libcloud/201002.mbox/%3C4239a4321002101650i2f995fd1gb1d6b1308ab9a39e@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
>
> What we have in or almost in trunk compared to 0.2.x:
> - deploy_node working well
> - new drivers:
> - Softlayer
> - ECP
> - IBM Dev Cloud (patch in progress)
> - Eucalyptus
> - improved test cases (love the new fixture files)
> - many misc bug fixes.
>
> What I'd like to do to ship 0.3.0:
> - Finish IBM driver support
> - Finalize extension API standards for drivers.
> - Add a tutorial to the website
>
> Anything I'm missing to make a solid 0.3?
>
> I think looking at that list, deploy node has the most significant
> impact on users of the library, making the boot strapping process
> between different providers much more seamless, letting tools built on
> top have a consistent method of getting into the servers after
> booting.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
--
Daniel Molina, Cloud Technology Engineer/Researcher
DSA Research Group: web http://dsa-research.org and blog
http://blog.dsa-research.org
OpenNebula Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing:
http://www.OpenNebula.org