You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by cm...@apache.org on 2011/07/26 18:23:23 UTC
svn commit: r1151157 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Author: cmpilato
Date: Tue Jul 26 16:23:23 2011
New Revision: 1151157
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1151157&view=rev
Log:
Vote for the r1147882 group, and clarify Bert's vote (per IRC).
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1151157&r1=1151156&r2=1151157&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Tue Jul 26 16:23:23 2011
@@ -42,27 +42,6 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+0: danielsh
- * r1147882, r1149343, r1149371, r1149372, r1149377, r1149398, r1149701, r1149713
- Validate consumer-supplied tokens in libsvn_fs. (This specifically applies
- to the output of pre-lock hook scripts.)
- Justification:
- Input validations are good; arbitrary lock tokens are bad, and can result
- in user-visible errors.
- Notes:
- r1147882 is reverted by r1149343.
- r1149343 reverts r1147882 and adds new code, which r1149371 rewrites.
- r1149371 is the change.
- r1149372 improves an error message.
- r1149377 is a typo fix.
- r1149398 fixes the bindings.
- r1149701 marks the test XFail for serf
- r1149713 correctly reports lock warnings and removes the XFail
- Votes:
- +1: danielsh
- +1: cmpilato (without r1149701, r1149713)
- +1: rhuijben (Without r1149701, r1149713 the behavior differs between the
- different ra layers and the tests fail on serf)
-
* r1147540, r1147541
Remove unused variables in build system.
Justification:
@@ -212,3 +191,22 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
Approved changes:
=================
+
+ * r1147882, r1149343, r1149371, r1149372, r1149377, r1149398, r1149701, r1149713
+ Validate consumer-supplied tokens in libsvn_fs. (This specifically applies
+ to the output of pre-lock hook scripts.)
+ Justification:
+ Input validations are good; arbitrary lock tokens are bad, and can result
+ in user-visible errors.
+ Notes:
+ r1147882 is reverted by r1149343.
+ r1149343 reverts r1147882 and adds new code, which r1149371 rewrites.
+ r1149371 is the change.
+ r1149372 improves an error message.
+ r1149377 is a typo fix.
+ r1149398 fixes the bindings.
+ r1149701 marks the test XFail for serf
+ r1149713 correctly reports lock warnings and removes the XFail
+ Votes:
+ +1: danielsh, cmpilato, rhuijben
+