You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@beam.apache.org by "Beam JIRA Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/03/17 17:26:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (BEAM-10233) Return error message/information with existing FAILED_ROW data from BigQueryWriteFn (Python SDK)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Beam JIRA Bot updated BEAM-10233:
---------------------------------
    Labels: stale-P2  (was: )

> Return error message/information with existing FAILED_ROW data from BigQueryWriteFn (Python SDK)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-10233
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10233
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io-py-gcp
>            Reporter: Tom Hardman
>            Priority: P2
>              Labels: stale-P2
>
> A user may call `apache_beam.io.gcp.bigquery.WriteToBigQuery` to write their streamed data to BQ. If any rows fail to write, this will return a tagged pcollection `BigQueryWriteFn.FAILED_ROWS`. This data includes a tuple `(destination_table, failed_row_payload)`.
> My suggestion is to include the error information in the `FAILED_ROWS` pcollection. From the source code we can see that we have access to the error information, e.g. that the row failed because field `id` was `invalid` because `this field is not a record`. I think we should surface this to the user.
> I'm happy to open a PR for this myself (as I've already had to overwrite the original code in several projects), but it looks like we'd need a breaking change by either extending the tuple which would cause unpacking issues in existing code, or by returning a different data structure entirely.
>  
> Relevant owners:
> [~altay] 
>  [~charleschen70@yahoo.com]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)