You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com> on 2004/09/07 19:08:20 UTC
Installing Confluence
Does anyone know where we are at with this? I am more than willing to
help.
-dain
On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:11 PM, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
> I'm willing to help out - I just about qualify for the requirements I
> guess.
>
> On 23 Jul 2004, at 02:51, Jeff Turner wrote:
>> Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF
>> Confluence instance? Requirements for the job:
>>
>> a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years
>> b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance
>> c) somewhat unix-savvy
>> d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do
>> things
>> like upgrades
>>
>> If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to
>> hold a
>> (PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for advice.
>> They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is
>> ready.
>>
>>
>> --Jeff
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote:
>>>> Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence? Like
>>>> someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I
>>>> don't
>>>> know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over Wikis.
>>>
>>> Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit
>>> test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with
>>> bugzilla.
>>> If you've used both you'll know what I mean.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to understand
>>>> the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site over
>>>> to
>>>> a different wiki system, with yet another syntax...
>>>
>>> There's not that much content. But we could start with just the
>>> manual
>>> in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this
>>> internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the old
>>> wiki stays around for a while its no biggie
>>>
>>> James
>>> -------
>>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>
>>
>>
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
Re: Installing Confluence
Posted by Bruce Snyder <fe...@frii.com>.
This one time, at band camp, Dain Sundstrom said:
DS>So last night as part of the release schedule I needed to update our
DS>wiki, and it took me a half hour just to figure out how to login
DS>MoinMoin...
I like MoinMoin much better than UseMod, but some of its usability
still isn't that great. Confluence is much more polished.
DS>Can anyone give us an up or down answer on if we can get confluence
DS>installed at Apache? If it we can't, I propose we find confluence
DS>space for Geronimo somewhere offsite.
I would say just go to Codehaus. But, IIRC, didn't we get our hands
slapped for using an external website previously (maybe that was
in Incubator thing)? At the same time, the Maven project already
does this, and with Codehaus to boot.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html
Re: Installing Confluence
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com>.
So last night as part of the release schedule I needed to update our
wiki, and it took me a half hour just to figure out how to login
MoinMoin...
Can anyone give us an up or down answer on if we can get confluence
installed at Apache? If it we can't, I propose we find confluence
space for Geronimo somewhere offsite.
-dain
On Sep 8, 2004, at 1:59 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> I also volunteered to help when the original thread was going on.
> Would be nice to see this setup.
>
> -David
>
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:08:20AM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> Does anyone know where we are at with this? I am more than willing to
>> help.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:11 PM, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
>>
>>> I'm willing to help out - I just about qualify for the requirements I
>>> guess.
>>>
>>> On 23 Jul 2004, at 02:51, Jeff Turner wrote:
>>>> Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF
>>>> Confluence instance? Requirements for the job:
>>>>
>>>> a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years
>>>> b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance
>>>> c) somewhat unix-savvy
>>>> d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do
>>>> things
>>>> like upgrades
>>>>
>>>> If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to
>>>> hold a
>>>> (PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for
>>>> advice.
>>>> They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is
>>>> ready.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Jeff
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote:
>>>>>> Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence?
>>>>>> Like
>>>>>> someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over
>>>>>> Wikis.
>>>>>
>>>>> Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit
>>>>> test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with
>>>>> bugzilla.
>>>>> If you've used both you'll know what I mean.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to
>>>>>> understand
>>>>>> the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> a different wiki system, with yet another syntax...
>>>>>
>>>>> There's not that much content. But we could start with just the
>>>>> manual
>>>>> in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this
>>>>> internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the
>>>>> old
>>>>> wiki stays around for a while its no biggie
>>>>>
>>>>> James
>>>>> -------
>>>>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> James
>>> -------
>>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>
Re: Installing Confluence
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
I also volunteered to help when the original thread was going on. Would be nice to see this setup.
-David
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:08:20AM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Does anyone know where we are at with this? I am more than willing to
> help.
>
> -dain
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:11 PM, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
>
> >I'm willing to help out - I just about qualify for the requirements I
> >guess.
> >
> >On 23 Jul 2004, at 02:51, Jeff Turner wrote:
> >>Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF
> >>Confluence instance? Requirements for the job:
> >>
> >> a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years
> >> b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance
> >> c) somewhat unix-savvy
> >> d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do
> >>things
> >> like upgrades
> >>
> >>If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to
> >>hold a
> >>(PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for advice.
> >>They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is
> >>ready.
> >>
> >>
> >>--Jeff
> >>
> >>On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, jastrachan@mac.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote:
> >>>>Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence? Like
> >>>>someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I
> >>>>don't
> >>>>know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over Wikis.
> >>>
> >>>Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit
> >>>test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use
> >>>etc.
> >>>
> >>>Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with
> >>>bugzilla.
> >>>If you've used both you'll know what I mean.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to understand
> >>>>the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site over
> >>>>to
> >>>>a different wiki system, with yet another syntax...
> >>>
> >>>There's not that much content. But we could start with just the
> >>>manual
> >>>in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this
> >>>internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the old
> >>>wiki stays around for a while its no biggie
> >>>
> >>>James
> >>>-------
> >>>http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >James
> >-------
> >http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >