Re: Question on derby benchmarks.

[Dy...@Sun.COM]

Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> writes:

> Paulo Jesus wrote:
>> I have developed some code on engine of Derby ver 10.2.2. Is part of
>> larger project GAPI from GORDA project,  (support for replication
>> services),  that uses embedded code. The project was not ported to ver
>> 10.3 yet.
>> I putted these question on list Derby-users but, after short talk
>> here,  i think maybe is best here.
>> I wonder what benchmarks have been in use by the Derby team. TPC-B?
>> And were can i find the source of those tests.
>
> Olav from Sun seems to have a TPC-B like benchmark using Derby but I
> don't believe the source is available.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon-data/attachments/Us2005OnlineSessionSlides/attachments/ApacheCon05usDerbyPerformance.pdf

I'm happy to announce that Sun has decided to donate the tests used by
Olav to the ASF and Derby. 

We are, however, a bit unsure about how to proceed. Can we simply
attach the files to a Jira issue and check the "Grant license to ASF for
inclusion in ASF works (as per the Apache License §5)" checkbox, or do
we need to to go through IP clearance
(http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html), for this
contribution? 

There are 3 tests (single record load, tpcb-like load and join load)
consisting of 27 source files that make up about 7000 lines of code
(wc -l).

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

-- 
dt

Re: Question on derby benchmarks.

[Dy...@Sun.COM]

John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com> writes:

> It appears that it should go through the IP Clearance process that you
> mentioned.  AFAIK IBM had to go through the same process for the Derby
> network server tests, see the see the
> derby-2248-contribution-tests-ibm
> <http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/derby-2248-contribution-tests-ibm.html>
> link on the IP clearance page.
>
> The Derby PMC would be responsible for filing an IP clearance form.

Thanks, John :) 

(I ended up starting a new thread under the Subject "How
to donate code to Apache) since not many people appeared to be
following this old thread.)

-- 
dt

Re: Question on derby benchmarks.

[John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com>]

It appears that it should go through the IP Clearance process that you 
mentioned.  AFAIK IBM had to go through the same process for the Derby 
network server tests, see the see the derby-2248-contribution-tests-ibm 
<http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/derby-2248-contribution-tests-ibm.html> 
link on the IP clearance page.

The Derby PMC would be responsible for filing an IP clearance form.

Regards,
John

Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> writes:
>
>   
>> Paulo Jesus wrote:
>>     
>>> I have developed some code on engine of Derby ver 10.2.2. Is part of
>>> larger project GAPI from GORDA project,  (support for replication
>>> services),  that uses embedded code. The project was not ported to ver
>>> 10.3 yet.
>>> I putted these question on list Derby-users but, after short talk
>>> here,  i think maybe is best here.
>>> I wonder what benchmarks have been in use by the Derby team. TPC-B?
>>> And were can i find the source of those tests.
>>>       
>> Olav from Sun seems to have a TPC-B like benchmark using Derby but I
>> don't believe the source is available.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon-data/attachments/Us2005OnlineSessionSlides/attachments/ApacheCon05usDerbyPerformance.pdf
>>     
>
> I'm happy to announce that Sun has decided to donate the tests used by
> Olav to the ASF and Derby. 
>
> We are, however, a bit unsure about how to proceed. Can we simply
> attach the files to a Jira issue and check the "Grant license to ASF for
> inclusion in ASF works (as per the Apache License §5)" checkbox, or do
> we need to to go through IP clearance
> (http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html), for this
> contribution? 
>
> There are 3 tests (single record load, tpcb-like load and join load)
> consisting of 27 source files that make up about 7000 lines of code
> (wc -l).
>
> Any advice would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
>