ApacheCon talk ideas

[Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>]

Considering we’re on track to log4j 3.0 this year, that could certainly
make for a talk on its own. Based on the various tracks available this
year, is anyone planning to submit a talk or have any suggestions on topics
they’d like to see?
-- 
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>

Re: ApacheCon talk ideas

[Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>]

Those all sound like good ideas. Based on my lack of success last year, I
may wish to submit multiple CFPs. I’ll follow up as I’ve submitted them.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 19:16 Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> If I was doing a talk it would probably be on “Logging in the Cloud” with
> a focus on our Spring, Docker, and Kubernetes support.
>
> Another valuable talk could be one about the advantages of using the Log4j
> 2 API instead of SLF4J. I would definitely note how commit activity on
> SLF4J and Logback has noticably slowed over the last few years, especially
> when compared with Log4j 2.
>
> As you mentioned a talk on 3.0 might be worth having but that would only
> make sense if a 3.0 release was imminent.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Mar 4, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I almost forgot that I noted an idea last year to do a State of Logging
> > Services type of presentation considering there were a few others like
> that
> > accepted then. Such a talk could touch on all our components.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 08:17 Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Considering we’re on track to log4j 3.0 this year, that could certainly
> >> make for a talk on its own. Based on the various tracks available this
> >> year, is anyone planning to submit a talk or have any suggestions on
> topics
> >> they’d like to see?
> >> --
> >> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> >>
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
>
> --
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>

Re: ApacheCon talk ideas

[Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>]

If I was doing a talk it would probably be on “Logging in the Cloud” with a focus on our Spring, Docker, and Kubernetes support. 

Another valuable talk could be one about the advantages of using the Log4j 2 API instead of SLF4J. I would definitely note how commit activity on SLF4J and Logback has noticably slowed over the last few years, especially when compared with Log4j 2.

As you mentioned a talk on 3.0 might be worth having but that would only make sense if a 3.0 release was imminent.

Ralph

> On Mar 4, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I almost forgot that I noted an idea last year to do a State of Logging
> Services type of presentation considering there were a few others like that
> accepted then. Such a talk could touch on all our components.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 08:17 Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Considering we’re on track to log4j 3.0 this year, that could certainly
>> make for a talk on its own. Based on the various tracks available this
>> year, is anyone planning to submit a talk or have any suggestions on topics
>> they’d like to see?
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>

Re: ApacheCon talk ideas

[Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>]

I almost forgot that I noted an idea last year to do a State of Logging
Services type of presentation considering there were a few others like that
accepted then. Such a talk could touch on all our components.

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 08:17 Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Considering we’re on track to log4j 3.0 this year, that could certainly
> make for a talk on its own. Based on the various tracks available this
> year, is anyone planning to submit a talk or have any suggestions on topics
> they’d like to see?
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
-- 
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>