You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Ralph Goers (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/23 17:22:18 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1297) Document "gc-free" configuration and performance

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15159126#comment-15159126 ] 

Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1297:
-------------------------------------

Why do loggers all need to be asynchronous?  It isn't obvious to me why synchronous loggers would have to create objects.
Why can't there be a Properties section?

I think the documentation for this should also call out what the impact is of using the non-gc-free components. For example, using a PatternLayout that has a lookup, using synchronous loggers or using properties.

> Document "gc-free" configuration and performance
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1297
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1297
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>            Reporter: Remko Popma
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>
> Update the site with a description of which configurations are GC-free (i.e., that don't create temporary objects in steady running state).
> Currently that means
> * Loggers are all asynchronous (Log4jContextSelector is set to org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLoggerContextSelector)
> * the configuration does not contain a <Properties> section
> * the "steady-state" appenders are either RandomAccessFile or RollingRandomAccessFile Appenders (logging to any other appender will cause temporary objects to be created - including ConsoleAppender)
> * the Layout is a PatternLayout that uses one of the pre-defined date formats, does not have any regular expression replacements, and does not have lookups (TODO: may need to restrict this further)
> * in user code, when logging a parameterized message, the number of parameters is no more than ... (TBD pending discussion in LOG4J2-1278)
> * in user code, when logging a parameterized message, parameters of primitive type are boxed in a reused StringBuilder (Log4j provides a utility to make this relatively painless)
> Furthermore, we need to explain that some of this functionality depends on ThreadLocals and so is disabled by default in web applications to prevent memory leaks. The page should also explain how to manually switch off the use of ThreadLocals.
> Finally, the page should show a performance test comparison similar to the [performance section|http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance] on the Async Loggers page. I'm thinking a comparison between Logback, Log4j-1, Log4j-2.0, Log4j-2.6 "classic" and Log4j-2.6 "gc-free" would be ideal.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org