You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to doxia-dev@maven.apache.org by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org> on 2007/09/20 16:51:05 UTC
[vote] promote doxia-module-fo
Hi,
I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to
doxia/doxia/doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs
:) and it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be
used to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
A stage site is here:
http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
Vote is open for 72 hrs.
+1
-Lukas
Re: [vote] promote doxia-module-fo
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
+1
On 20 Sep 07, at 7:51 AM 20 Sep 07, Lukas Theussl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to doxia/doxia/
> doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs :) and
> it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be used
> to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
>
> A stage site is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
>
> Vote is open for 72 hrs.
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
Re: [vote] promote doxia-module-fo
Posted by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>.
ping
I need one more vote please.
Thanks,
-Lukas
Lukas Theussl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to
> doxia/doxia/doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs
> :) and it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be
> used to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
>
> A stage site is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
>
> Vote is open for 72 hrs.
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
Re: [vote] promote doxia-module-fo
Posted by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>.
We have 3 +1s now (Jason, Lukas, Vincent), I will go ahead with the
promotion.
Cheers,
-Lukas
Lukas Theussl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to
> doxia/doxia/doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs
> :) and it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be
> used to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
>
> A stage site is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
>
> Vote is open for 72 hrs.
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
Re: [vote] promote doxia-module-fo
Posted by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>.
Vincent Siveton wrote:
> +1
>
> Also, we could update several interfaces in the doc-renderer to handle
> 2 pdfs implementations: itext and fo.
>
That's actually the main practical reason for why I want to promote the
fo module now: I can't advance with the pdf plugin with the current form
of DocRenderer and DocumentModel. I'll rewrite some stuff as soon as we
have both on the same level.
-Lukas
> Vincent
>
> 2007/9/20, Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to
>>doxia/doxia/doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs
>> :) and it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be
>>used to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
>>
>>A stage site is here:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
>>
>>Vote is open for 72 hrs.
>>
>>+1
>>
>>-Lukas
>>
Re: [vote] promote doxia-module-fo
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1
Also, we could update several interfaces in the doc-renderer to handle
2 pdfs implementations: itext and fo.
Vincent
2007/9/20, Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to promote the fo module from sandbox/doxia to
> doxia/doxia/doxia-modules. It has some basic docs and tests, has 0 bugs
> :) and it's needed by the (sandbox) pdf plugin (which can already be
> used to test it, but beware, it's a bit rough still).
>
> A stage site is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/doxia-module-fo/
>
> Vote is open for 72 hrs.
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
>