You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com> on 2013/12/01 18:31:11 UTC
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> have a great opportunity for you :)
>
> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> also attractive.
>
> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>
> A couple of constraints:
> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> will make life simpler)
> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
> scale/etc)
> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
> sentence makes it out to be.)
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> --David
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
I will give it a try, but we can not have all and everything in 120x80
pixels. I have a not quite complete, reverse-engineered svg monkey, feel
free to reuse it.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to miss the monkey. Are you sure there's not any way to work it
> in??
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you all for the feedback!
> > - stretching: yes, that is true and it does not look good
> > - apache: If I have to put the apache there, then I will have to
> completely
> > rearrange the design. Are you sure it is a must-have? Wikipedia displays
> a
> > logo without the "apache".
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_CloudStack
> > - etc: the "powered by" font type does not go well with the "cloudstack"
> >
> > I go back to my drawing board and see what I can do for v0.0.2
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I like,
> > > 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> > > I think it must even.
> > > 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > > >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> > CloudStack
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is my version:
> > > >> - SVG format as you requested
> > > >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> > prefer
> > > few
> > > >> colors for such pictures
> > > >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> > to
> > > fit
> > > >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
> (the
> > > >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > > >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > > >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> > > >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > > >> - see attached file :)
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> be
> > > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> cute.)
> > > >
> > > > Two things -
> > > >
> > > > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> > > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional,
> > not
> > > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> > screen... :)
> > > > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> > > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> > > shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
> > > >
> > > > -robyn
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi folks:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> > > >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> is
> > > >> > also attractive.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > >
> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> > > >> >
> > > >> > A couple of constraints:
> > > >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> > > >> > will make life simpler)
> > > >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> > to
> > > >> > scale/etc)
> > > >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> > that
> > > >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> > around
> > > >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> > that
> > > >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Anyone interested?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --David
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> EOF
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > EOF
> >
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>.
I'm going to miss the monkey. Are you sure there's not any way to work it
in??
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you all for the feedback!
> - stretching: yes, that is true and it does not look good
> - apache: If I have to put the apache there, then I will have to completely
> rearrange the design. Are you sure it is a must-have? Wikipedia displays a
> logo without the "apache".
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_CloudStack
> - etc: the "powered by" font type does not go well with the "cloudstack"
>
> I go back to my drawing board and see what I can do for v0.0.2
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I like,
> > 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> > I think it must even.
> > 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Here is my version:
> > >> - SVG format as you requested
> > >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> prefer
> > few
> > >> colors for such pictures
> > >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> to
> > fit
> > >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> > >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> > >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > >> - see attached file :)
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be
> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
> > >
> > > Two things -
> > >
> > > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional,
> not
> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> screen... :)
> > > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> > shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
> > >
> > > -robyn
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi folks:
> > >> >
> > >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> > >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > >> >
> > >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> > >> > also attractive.
> > >> >
> > >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > >> >
> > >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> > >> >
> > >> > A couple of constraints:
> > >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> > >> > will make life simpler)
> > >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> to
> > >> > scale/etc)
> > >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> that
> > >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> around
> > >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> that
> > >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyone interested?
> > >> >
> > >> > --David
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> EOF
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thank you all for the feedback!
- stretching: yes, that is true and it does not look good
- apache: If I have to put the apache there, then I will have to completely
rearrange the design. Are you sure it is a must-have? Wikipedia displays a
logo without the "apache".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_CloudStack
- etc: the "powered by" font type does not go well with the "cloudstack"
I go back to my drawing board and see what I can do for v0.0.2
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here is my version:
> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer
> few
> >> colors for such pictures
> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to
> fit
> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> - see attached file :)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
> >
> > Two things -
> >
> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
> >
> > -robyn
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >
> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >
> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> >> > also attractive.
> >> >
> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >
> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >
> >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >
> >> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >
> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
> >> > scale/etc)
> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >
> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >
> >> > --David
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> EOF
> >>
>
--
EOF
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Giles Sirett <gi...@shapeblue.com>.
+1
Steve. Agreed
Mr monkey has his place for some, but I don't think every organisation would use him
Kind Regards
Giles
D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Wilson [mailto:steve.wilson@citrix.com]
Sent: 06 December 2013 16:45
To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Seems like the simple answer is to one one "powered by" logo with Monkey and one sans-Monkey. That way the person/entity choosing to display it on their site could choose the image they want to portray.
On 12/6/13 6:04 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Kirk,
>
>Not to stress my dislike of our fellow primates; I would like some more
>emphasis on the cloud then that. The fellow reminds me just a tad to
>much of greasemonkey.
>
>my .02 of wrench,
>Daan
>
>On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and
>>saw my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this
>>year.
>>It's
>> the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
>>documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words
>>"powered", "by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious)
>>throughout the logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not
>>asking to change things, I'm just brainstorming here.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kirk Jantzer
>> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>><la...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to
>>>my previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now
>>>you have a very easy job :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland
>>> <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>>> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any
>>> > of our fellow primates)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer
>>><ki...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the
>>>monkey. I
>>> > think
>>> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more
>>> > > balanced,
>>>like
>>> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text,
>>>but
>>> the
>>> > > idea)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Kirk Jantzer
>>> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>><daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a
>>> > >> graphical stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out
>>> > >> on the top right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you
>>> > >> can try one
>>>without
>>> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is
>>>between
>>> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> sorry to nag,
>>> > >> Daan
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>>> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> > Hi,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>>> > >> > - Complete monkey added
>>> > >> > - "Apache" added
>>> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo This also comes with
>>> > >> > some cons:
>>> > >> > - 4 colors
>>> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1 but if you look at
>>> > >> > it scaled down to very small, it is still
>>> readable,
>>> > >> even
>>> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also
>>> > >> > attached
>>>the
>>> up
>>> > to
>>> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with
>>>cloud.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the
>>>poweredbycloudstack
>>> > svg,
>>> > >> spot
>>> > >> > the difference :-)
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Thank you,
>>> > >> > Laszlo
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>>> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I like,
>>> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be
>>> > >> >> in
>>> there.
>>> > >> >> I think it must even.
>>> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
>>> rbergero@redhat.com>
>>> > >> >> wrote:
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>>> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo
>>> > >> >> >> for
>>> > >> CloudStack
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> Hi,
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
>>> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>>> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original
>>>logo. I
>>> > >> prefer
>>> > >> >> >> few
>>> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>>> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole
>>>thing
>>> > needs
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >> >> fit
>>> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little
>>>detail
>>> > (the
>>> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>>> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>>> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it
>>>make
>>> > make
>>> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>>> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > Hi,
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that
>>> > >> >> > it's
>>>going
>>> > to
>>> > >> be
>>> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though
>>>he's so
>>> > >> cute.)
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > Two things -
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched
>>> > >> >> > as
>>> > compared
>>> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>>> > >> intentional, not
>>> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering
>>> > >> >> > on
>>>my
>>> > >> screen... :)
>>> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do
>>> > >> >> > we
>>> want
>>> > to
>>> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any
>>> > >> >> > reason
>>>why
>>> it
>>> > >> shouldn't
>>> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > -robyn
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
>>><da...@gnsa.us>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I
>>> > >> >> >> > have
>>> > none) I
>>> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to
>>>consume,
>>> > and
>>> > >> is
>>> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout
>>>-lo
>>>go-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_1
>>>50p
>>>x.png
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>>> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but
>>> > >> >> >> > lets
>>> not;
>>> > it
>>> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>>> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source
>>> > >> >> >> > (this
>>> allows
>>> > us
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>>> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>>> > different
>>> > >> >> >> > that
>>> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email
>>>agreement
>>> > >> around
>>> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't
>>> > >> >> >> > as
>>>scary
>>> > as
>>> > >> >> >> > that
>>> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > --David
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> --
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> EOF
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > EOF
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> EOF
>>>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Karen Vuong <ka...@citrix.com>.
+1
Best regards,
Karen
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Wilson [mailto:steve.wilson@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 8:45 AM
To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Seems like the simple answer is to one one "powered by" logo with Monkey and one sans-Monkey. That way the person/entity choosing to display it on their site could choose the image they want to portray.
On 12/6/13 6:04 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Kirk,
>
>Not to stress my dislike of our fellow primates; I would like some more
>emphasis on the cloud then that. The fellow reminds me just a tad to
>much of greasemonkey.
>
>my .02 of wrench,
>Daan
>
>On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and
>>saw my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this
>>year.
>>It's
>> the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
>>documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words
>>"powered", "by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious)
>>throughout the logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not
>>asking to change things, I'm just brainstorming here.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kirk Jantzer
>> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>><la...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to
>>>my previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now
>>>you have a very easy job :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland
>>> <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>>> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any
>>> > of our fellow primates)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer
>>><ki...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the
>>>monkey. I
>>> > think
>>> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more
>>> > > balanced,
>>>like
>>> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text,
>>>but
>>> the
>>> > > idea)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Kirk Jantzer
>>> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>><daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a
>>> > >> graphical stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out
>>> > >> on the top right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you
>>> > >> can try one
>>>without
>>> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is
>>>between
>>> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> sorry to nag,
>>> > >> Daan
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>>> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> > Hi,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>>> > >> > - Complete monkey added
>>> > >> > - "Apache" added
>>> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo This also comes with
>>> > >> > some cons:
>>> > >> > - 4 colors
>>> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1 but if you look at
>>> > >> > it scaled down to very small, it is still
>>> readable,
>>> > >> even
>>> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also
>>> > >> > attached
>>>the
>>> up
>>> > to
>>> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with
>>>cloud.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the
>>>poweredbycloudstack
>>> > svg,
>>> > >> spot
>>> > >> > the difference :-)
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Thank you,
>>> > >> > Laszlo
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>>> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I like,
>>> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be
>>> > >> >> in
>>> there.
>>> > >> >> I think it must even.
>>> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
>>> rbergero@redhat.com>
>>> > >> >> wrote:
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>>> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo
>>> > >> >> >> for
>>> > >> CloudStack
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> Hi,
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
>>> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>>> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original
>>>logo. I
>>> > >> prefer
>>> > >> >> >> few
>>> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>>> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole
>>>thing
>>> > needs
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >> >> fit
>>> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little
>>>detail
>>> > (the
>>> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>>> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>>> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it
>>>make
>>> > make
>>> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>>> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > Hi,
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that
>>> > >> >> > it's
>>>going
>>> > to
>>> > >> be
>>> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though
>>>he's so
>>> > >> cute.)
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > Two things -
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched
>>> > >> >> > as
>>> > compared
>>> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>>> > >> intentional, not
>>> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering
>>> > >> >> > on
>>>my
>>> > >> screen... :)
>>> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do
>>> > >> >> > we
>>> want
>>> > to
>>> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any
>>> > >> >> > reason
>>>why
>>> it
>>> > >> shouldn't
>>> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > -robyn
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
>>><da...@gnsa.us>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I
>>> > >> >> >> > have
>>> > none) I
>>> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to
>>>consume,
>>> > and
>>> > >> is
>>> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout
>>>-lo
>>>go-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_1
>>>50p
>>>x.png
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>>> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but
>>> > >> >> >> > lets
>>> not;
>>> > it
>>> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>>> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source
>>> > >> >> >> > (this
>>> allows
>>> > us
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>>> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>>> > different
>>> > >> >> >> > that
>>> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email
>>>agreement
>>> > >> around
>>> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't
>>> > >> >> >> > as
>>>scary
>>> > as
>>> > >> >> >> > that
>>> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > --David
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> --
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> EOF
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > EOF
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> EOF
>>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Steve Wilson <st...@citrix.com>.
Seems like the simple answer is to one one "powered by" logo with Monkey
and one sans-Monkey. That way the person/entity choosing to display it on
their site could choose the image they want to portray.
On 12/6/13 6:04 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Kirk,
>
>Not to stress my dislike of our fellow primates; I would like some
>more emphasis on the cloud then that. The fellow reminds me just a tad
>to much of greasemonkey.
>
>my .02 of wrench,
>Daan
>
>On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and
>>saw
>> my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this year.
>>It's
>> the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
>> documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words
>>"powered",
>> "by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious) throughout the
>> logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not asking to change
>> things, I'm just brainstorming here.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kirk Jantzer
>> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>><la...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
>>> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you
>>>have a
>>> very easy job :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>>> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
>>> > our fellow primates)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer
>>><ki...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the
>>>monkey. I
>>> > think
>>> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced,
>>>like
>>> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text,
>>>but
>>> the
>>> > > idea)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Kirk Jantzer
>>> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>><daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>>> > >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>>> > >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one
>>>without
>>> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is
>>>between
>>> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> sorry to nag,
>>> > >> Daan
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>>> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> > Hi,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>>> > >> > - Complete monkey added
>>> > >> > - "Apache" added
>>> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>>> > >> > This also comes with some cons:
>>> > >> > - 4 colors
>>> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>>> > >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
>>> readable,
>>> > >> even
>>> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached
>>>the
>>> up
>>> > to
>>> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with
>>>cloud.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the
>>>poweredbycloudstack
>>> > svg,
>>> > >> spot
>>> > >> > the difference :-)
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Thank you,
>>> > >> > Laszlo
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>>> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I like,
>>> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
>>> there.
>>> > >> >> I think it must even.
>>> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
>>> rbergero@redhat.com>
>>> > >> >> wrote:
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>>> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>>> > >> CloudStack
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> Hi,
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
>>> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>>> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original
>>>logo. I
>>> > >> prefer
>>> > >> >> >> few
>>> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>>> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole
>>>thing
>>> > needs
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >> >> fit
>>> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little
>>>detail
>>> > (the
>>> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>>> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>>> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it
>>>make
>>> > make
>>> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>>> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > Hi,
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's
>>>going
>>> > to
>>> > >> be
>>> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though
>>>he's so
>>> > >> cute.)
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > Two things -
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
>>> > compared
>>> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>>> > >> intentional, not
>>> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on
>>>my
>>> > >> screen... :)
>>> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
>>> want
>>> > to
>>> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason
>>>why
>>> it
>>> > >> shouldn't
>>> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> > -robyn
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
>>><da...@gnsa.us>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
>>> > none) I
>>> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to
>>>consume,
>>> > and
>>> > >> is
>>> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-lo
>>>go-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150p
>>>x.png
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>>> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
>>> not;
>>> > it
>>> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>>> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
>>> allows
>>> > us
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>>> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>>> > different
>>> > >> >> >> > that
>>> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email
>>>agreement
>>> > >> around
>>> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as
>>>scary
>>> > as
>>> > >> >> >> > that
>>> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >> > --David
>>> > >> >> >> >
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> --
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >> >> EOF
>>> > >> >> >>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > EOF
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> EOF
>>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Kirk,
Not to stress my dislike of our fellow primates; I would like some
more emphasis on the cloud then that. The fellow reminds me just a tad
to much of greasemonkey.
my .02 of wrench,
Daan
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and saw
> my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this year. It's
> the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
> documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words "powered",
> "by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious) throughout the
> logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not asking to change
> things, I'm just brainstorming here.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
>> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
>> very easy job :-)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
>> > our fellow primates)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
>> > think
>> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
>> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
>> the
>> > > idea)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Kirk Jantzer
>> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> > >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> > >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>> > >>
>> > >> sorry to nag,
>> > >> Daan
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > Hi,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > >> > - Complete monkey added
>> > >> > - "Apache" added
>> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > >> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > >> > - 4 colors
>> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
>> readable,
>> > >> even
>> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
>> up
>> > to
>> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
>> > svg,
>> > >> spot
>> > >> > the difference :-)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thank you,
>> > >> > Laszlo
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I like,
>> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
>> there.
>> > >> >> I think it must even.
>> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
>> rbergero@redhat.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> > >> CloudStack
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Hi,
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
>> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> > >> prefer
>> > >> >> >> few
>> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
>> > needs
>> > >> to
>> > >> >> >> fit
>> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
>> > (the
>> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
>> > make
>> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Hi,
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
>> > to
>> > >> be
>> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> > >> cute.)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Two things -
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
>> > compared
>> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> > >> intentional, not
>> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> > >> screen... :)
>> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
>> want
>> > to
>> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why
>> it
>> > >> shouldn't
>> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > -robyn
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
>> > none) I
>> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
>> > and
>> > >> is
>> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
>> not;
>> > it
>> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
>> allows
>> > us
>> > >> to
>> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>> > different
>> > >> >> >> > that
>> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> > >> around
>> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
>> > as
>> > >> >> >> > that
>> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > --David
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> --
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> EOF
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> >
>> > >> > EOF
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> EOF
>>
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Steve Roles <st...@shapeblue.com>.
Was it a monkey-wrench Kirk?
Regards,
Steve Roles
D: +44 20 3642 6102 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7770 745 036
steve.roles@shapeblue.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Kirk Jantzer [mailto:kirk.jantzer@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 December 2013 21:10
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and saw my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this year. It's the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words "powered", "by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious) throughout the logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not asking to change things, I'm just brainstorming here.
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you
> have a very easy job :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland
> <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
> > our fellow primates)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer
> > <ki...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the
> > > monkey. I
> > think
> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced,
> > > like
> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text,
> > > but
> the
> > > idea)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Kirk Jantzer
> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
> > ><daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a
> > >> graphical stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out
> > >> on the top right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can
> > >> try one without the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the
> > >> picture is between the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> > >>
> > >> sorry to nag,
> > >> Daan
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > >> > - Complete monkey added
> > >> > - "Apache" added
> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo This also comes with some
> > >> > cons:
> > >> > - 4 colors
> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1 but if you look at
> > >> > it scaled down to very small, it is still
> readable,
> > >> even
> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
> > >> >
> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached
> > >> > the
> up
> > to
> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> > >> >
> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the
> > >> > poweredbycloudstack
> > svg,
> > >> spot
> > >> > the difference :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Laszlo
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I like,
> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
> there.
> > >> >> I think it must even.
> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
> rbergero@redhat.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo
> > >> >> >> for
> > >> CloudStack
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Hi,
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original
> > >> >> >> logo. I
> > >> prefer
> > >> >> >> few
> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole
> > >> >> >> thing
> > needs
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> fit
> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little
> > >> >> >> detail
> > (the
> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it
> > >> >> >> make
> > make
> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Hi,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's
> > >> >> > going
> > to
> > >> be
> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though
> > >> >> > he's so
> > >> cute.)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Two things -
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
> > compared
> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> > >> intentional, not
> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on
> > >> >> > my
> > >> screen... :)
> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do
> > >> >> > we
> want
> > to
> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason
> > >> >> > why
> it
> > >> shouldn't
> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > -robyn
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
> > >> >> >> <da...@gnsa.us>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I
> > >> >> >> > have
> > none) I
> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to
> > >> >> >> > consume,
> > and
> > >> is
> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-
> logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_15
> 0px.png
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but
> > >> >> >> > lets
> not;
> > it
> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
> allows
> > us
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
> > different
> > >> >> >> > that
> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email
> > >> >> >> > agreement
> > >> around
> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as
> > >> >> >> > scary
> > as
> > >> >> >> > that
> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > --David
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> --
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> EOF
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > EOF
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Kirk,
Not to stress my dislike of our fellow primates; I would like some
more emphasis on the cloud then that. The fellow reminds me just a tad
to much of greasemonkey.
my .02 of wrench,
Daan
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and saw
> my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this year. It's
> the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
> documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words "powered",
> "by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious) throughout the
> logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not asking to change
> things, I'm just brainstorming here.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
>> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
>> very easy job :-)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
>> > our fellow primates)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
>> > think
>> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
>> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
>> the
>> > > idea)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Kirk Jantzer
>> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> > >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> > >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>> > >>
>> > >> sorry to nag,
>> > >> Daan
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > Hi,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > >> > - Complete monkey added
>> > >> > - "Apache" added
>> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > >> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > >> > - 4 colors
>> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
>> readable,
>> > >> even
>> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
>> up
>> > to
>> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
>> > svg,
>> > >> spot
>> > >> > the difference :-)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thank you,
>> > >> > Laszlo
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I like,
>> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
>> there.
>> > >> >> I think it must even.
>> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
>> rbergero@redhat.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> > >> CloudStack
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Hi,
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
>> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> > >> prefer
>> > >> >> >> few
>> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
>> > needs
>> > >> to
>> > >> >> >> fit
>> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
>> > (the
>> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
>> > make
>> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Hi,
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
>> > to
>> > >> be
>> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> > >> cute.)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Two things -
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
>> > compared
>> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> > >> intentional, not
>> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> > >> screen... :)
>> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
>> want
>> > to
>> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why
>> it
>> > >> shouldn't
>> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > -robyn
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
>> > none) I
>> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
>> > and
>> > >> is
>> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
>> not;
>> > it
>> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
>> allows
>> > us
>> > >> to
>> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>> > different
>> > >> >> >> > that
>> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> > >> around
>> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
>> > as
>> > >> >> >> > that
>> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > --David
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> --
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> EOF
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> >
>> > >> > EOF
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> EOF
>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>.
Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and saw
my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this year. It's
the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words "powered",
"by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious) throughout the
logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not asking to change
things, I'm just brainstorming here.
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
> very easy job :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
> > our fellow primates)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> > think
> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
> the
> > > idea)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Kirk Jantzer
> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> > >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> > >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> > >>
> > >> sorry to nag,
> > >> Daan
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > >> > - Complete monkey added
> > >> > - "Apache" added
> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
> > >> > This also comes with some cons:
> > >> > - 4 colors
> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> > >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
> readable,
> > >> even
> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
> > >> >
> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
> up
> > to
> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> > >> >
> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
> > svg,
> > >> spot
> > >> > the difference :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Laszlo
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I like,
> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
> there.
> > >> >> I think it must even.
> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
> rbergero@redhat.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> > >> CloudStack
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Hi,
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> > >> prefer
> > >> >> >> few
> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
> > needs
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> fit
> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
> > (the
> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
> > make
> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Hi,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
> > to
> > >> be
> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> > >> cute.)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Two things -
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
> > compared
> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> > >> intentional, not
> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> > >> screen... :)
> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
> want
> > to
> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why
> it
> > >> shouldn't
> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > -robyn
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
> > none) I
> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
> > and
> > >> is
> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
> not;
> > it
> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
> allows
> > us
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
> > different
> > >> >> >> > that
> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> > >> around
> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
> > as
> > >> >> >> > that
> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > --David
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> --
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> EOF
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > EOF
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Suresh Sadhu <Su...@citrix.com>.
I like the monkeyinside-0.0.3.1.svg and also steroid monkey[ in this it will be good if we reduce the fonsize for the text " poweredby"]
Regards
Sadhu
From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 03:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok with the trademark)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a very easy job :-)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
our fellow primates)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> <la...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > - Complete monkey added
>> > - "Apache" added
>> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > - 4 colors
>> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >
>> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >
>> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>> > the difference :-)
>> >
>> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Laszlo
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I like,
>> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> >> I think it must even.
>> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>> >> >> few
>> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>> >> >> fit
>> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Two things -
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >
>> >> > -robyn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>> is
>> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>> to
>> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> around
>> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> EOF
>> >> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > EOF
>>
--
EOF
--
EOF
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Alex Hitchins <al...@shapeblue.com>.
I like the monkeyinside ones - very nice.
Alex Hitchins
T: +44 1892 523 587
M: +44 7788 423 969
From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 February 2014 22:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok with the trademark)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a very easy job :-)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
our fellow primates)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> <la...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > - Complete monkey added
>> > - "Apache" added
>> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > - 4 colors
>> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >
>> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >
>> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>> > the difference :-)
>> >
>> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Laszlo
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I like,
>> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> >> I think it must even.
>> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>> >> >> few
>> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>> >> >> fit
>> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Two things -
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >
>> >> > -robyn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>> is
>> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>> to
>> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> around
>> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> EOF
>> >> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > EOF
>>
--
EOF
--
EOF
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Suresh Sadhu <Su...@citrix.com>.
I like the monkeyinside-0.0.3.1.svg and also steroid monkey[ in this it will be good if we reduce the fonsize for the text " poweredby"]
Regards
Sadhu
From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 03:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok with the trademark)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a very easy job :-)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
our fellow primates)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> <la...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > - Complete monkey added
>> > - "Apache" added
>> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > - 4 colors
>> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >
>> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >
>> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>> > the difference :-)
>> >
>> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Laszlo
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I like,
>> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> >> I think it must even.
>> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>> >> >> few
>> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>> >> >> fit
>> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Two things -
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >
>> >> > -robyn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>> is
>> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>> to
>> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> around
>> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> EOF
>> >> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > EOF
>>
--
EOF
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok
with the trademark)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
> very easy job :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>> monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
>> our fellow primates)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
>> think
>> > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
>> > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
>> the
>> > idea)
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Kirk Jantzer
>> > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>> >>
>> >> sorry to nag,
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> >> > - Complete monkey added
>> >> > - "Apache" added
>> >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> >> > This also comes with some cons:
>> >> > - 4 colors
>> >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
>> readable,
>> >> even
>> >> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >> >
>> >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
>> up to
>> >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >> >
>> >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
>> svg,
>> >> spot
>> >> > the difference :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you,
>> >> > Laszlo
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I like,
>> >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
>> there.
>> >> >> I think it must even.
>> >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@redhat.com
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> >> CloudStack
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> >> prefer
>> >> >> >> few
>> >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
>> needs
>> >> to
>> >> >> >> fit
>> >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
>> (the
>> >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
>> make
>> >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
>> to
>> >> be
>> >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> >> cute.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Two things -
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
>> compared
>> >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> >> intentional, not
>> >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> >> screen... :)
>> >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
>> want to
>> >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> >> shouldn't
>> >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -robyn
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
>> none) I
>> >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
>> and
>> >> is
>> >> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
>> not; it
>> >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
>> allows us
>> >> to
>> >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>> different
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> >> around
>> >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
>> as
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> EOF
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > EOF
>> >>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok
with the trademark)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
> very easy job :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>> monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
>> our fellow primates)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
>> think
>> > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
>> > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
>> the
>> > idea)
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Kirk Jantzer
>> > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>> >>
>> >> sorry to nag,
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> >> > - Complete monkey added
>> >> > - "Apache" added
>> >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> >> > This also comes with some cons:
>> >> > - 4 colors
>> >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
>> readable,
>> >> even
>> >> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >> >
>> >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
>> up to
>> >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >> >
>> >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
>> svg,
>> >> spot
>> >> > the difference :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you,
>> >> > Laszlo
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I like,
>> >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
>> there.
>> >> >> I think it must even.
>> >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@redhat.com
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> >> CloudStack
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> >> prefer
>> >> >> >> few
>> >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
>> needs
>> >> to
>> >> >> >> fit
>> >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
>> (the
>> >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
>> make
>> >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
>> to
>> >> be
>> >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> >> cute.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Two things -
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
>> compared
>> >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> >> intentional, not
>> >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> >> screen... :)
>> >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
>> want to
>> >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> >> shouldn't
>> >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -robyn
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
>> none) I
>> >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
>> and
>> >> is
>> >> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
>> not; it
>> >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
>> allows us
>> >> to
>> >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
>> different
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> >> around
>> >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
>> as
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> EOF
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > EOF
>> >>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>.
Not to throw a wrench in things, but I got into work this morning and saw
my badge from the CloudStack conference in San Jose earlier this year. It's
the face of a monkey made up of a bunch of text from some CloudStack
documentation. I thought something to that effect with the words "powered",
"by", "apache", and "cloudstack" scattered (but obvious) throughout the
logo. What are everyone's thoughts on this?? I'm not asking to change
things, I'm just brainstorming here.
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
> very easy job :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
> > monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
> > our fellow primates)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> > think
> > > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> > > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
> the
> > > idea)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Kirk Jantzer
> > > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> > >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> > >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> > >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> > >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> > >>
> > >> sorry to nag,
> > >> Daan
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> > >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > >> > - Complete monkey added
> > >> > - "Apache" added
> > >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
> > >> > This also comes with some cons:
> > >> > - 4 colors
> > >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> > >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
> readable,
> > >> even
> > >> > the monkey is so-so.
> > >> >
> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
> up
> > to
> > >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> > >> >
> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
> > svg,
> > >> spot
> > >> > the difference :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > Your feedback is welcome!
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Laszlo
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> > daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I like,
> > >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
> there.
> > >> >> I think it must even.
> > >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <
> rbergero@redhat.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> > >> CloudStack
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Hi,
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Here is my version:
> > >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> > >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> > >> prefer
> > >> >> >> few
> > >> >> >> colors for such pictures
> > >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
> > needs
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> fit
> > >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
> > (the
> > >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
> > make
> > >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > >> >> >> - see attached file :)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Hi,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
> > to
> > >> be
> > >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> > >> cute.)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Two things -
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
> > compared
> > >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> > >> intentional, not
> > >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> > >> screen... :)
> > >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
> want
> > to
> > >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why
> it
> > >> shouldn't
> > >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > -robyn
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > Hi folks:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
> > none) I
> > >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
> > and
> > >> is
> > >> >> >> > also attractive.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> > >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets
> not;
> > it
> > >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> > >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this
> allows
> > us
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> > scale/etc)
> > >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
> > different
> > >> >> >> > that
> > >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> > >> around
> > >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
> > as
> > >> >> >> > that
> > >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > --David
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> --
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> EOF
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > EOF
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
very easy job :-)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
> monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
> our fellow primates)
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> > idea)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kirk Jantzer
> > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> >>
> >> sorry to nag,
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> >> > - Complete monkey added
> >> > - "Apache" added
> >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
> >> > This also comes with some cons:
> >> > - 4 colors
> >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> >> even
> >> > the monkey is so-so.
> >> >
> >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up
> to
> >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> >> >
> >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
> svg,
> >> spot
> >> > the difference :-)
> >> >
> >> > Your feedback is welcome!
> >> >
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Laszlo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I like,
> >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> >> >> I think it must even.
> >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> >> CloudStack
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Here is my version:
> >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> >> prefer
> >> >> >> few
> >> >> >> colors for such pictures
> >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
> needs
> >> to
> >> >> >> fit
> >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
> (the
> >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
> make
> >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> >> >> - see attached file :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
> to
> >> be
> >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> >> cute.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Two things -
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
> compared
> >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> >> intentional, not
> >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> >> screen... :)
> >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want
> to
> >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> >> shouldn't
> >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -robyn
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
> none) I
> >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
> and
> >> is
> >> >> >> > also attractive.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >>
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not;
> it
> >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows
> us
> >> to
> >> >> >> > scale/etc)
> >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
> different
> >> >> >> > that
> >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> >> around
> >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
> as
> >> >> >> > that
> >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --David
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> EOF
> >> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > EOF
> >>
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
very easy job :-)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
> monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
> our fellow primates)
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> > idea)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kirk Jantzer
> > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> >>
> >> sorry to nag,
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> >> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> >> > - Complete monkey added
> >> > - "Apache" added
> >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
> >> > This also comes with some cons:
> >> > - 4 colors
> >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> >> even
> >> > the monkey is so-so.
> >> >
> >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up
> to
> >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> >> >
> >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
> svg,
> >> spot
> >> > the difference :-)
> >> >
> >> > Your feedback is welcome!
> >> >
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Laszlo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I like,
> >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> >> >> I think it must even.
> >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> >> CloudStack
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Here is my version:
> >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> >> prefer
> >> >> >> few
> >> >> >> colors for such pictures
> >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
> needs
> >> to
> >> >> >> fit
> >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
> (the
> >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make
> make
> >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> >> >> - see attached file :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going
> to
> >> be
> >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> >> cute.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Two things -
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
> compared
> >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> >> intentional, not
> >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> >> screen... :)
> >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want
> to
> >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> >> shouldn't
> >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -robyn
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have
> none) I
> >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume,
> and
> >> is
> >> >> >> > also attractive.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >>
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not;
> it
> >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows
> us
> >> to
> >> >> >> > scale/etc)
> >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly
> different
> >> >> >> > that
> >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> >> around
> >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary
> as
> >> >> >> > that
> >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --David
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> EOF
> >> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > EOF
> >>
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
our fellow primates)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > - Complete monkey added
>> > - "Apache" added
>> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > - 4 colors
>> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >
>> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >
>> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>> > the difference :-)
>> >
>> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Laszlo
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I like,
>> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> >> I think it must even.
>> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>> >> >> few
>> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>> >> >> fit
>> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> - see attached file :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Two things -
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >
>> >> > -robyn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>> is
>> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>> to
>> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> around
>> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> EOF
>> >> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > EOF
>>
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Karen Vuong <ka...@citrix.com>.
Hi all,
I've created several versions of the "Powered By" Apache CloudStack logo.
Horizontal: http://i.imgur.com/z0qdR2g.jpg
Horizontal with Cloud Monkey: http://i.imgur.com/Cosyd8o.jpg
Square: http://i.imgur.com/L3iR4Uu.jpg
Square with Border: http://i.imgur.com/EjAnLtG.jpg
Square with Cloud Monkey: http://i.imgur.com/LmsSgxT.jpg
Square with Border & Cloud Monkey: http://i.imgur.com/YwRukuN.jpg
I actually came across an open source font called "Generic" that is very similar to the commercial font that was used previously. I used Generic to create the logos above. I'd suggest updating the original Apache CloudStack logo by replacing it with Generic.
Link to font: http://openfontlibrary.org/en/font/generic
License: SIL Open Font License (OFL) http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL
If everyone likes the "Powered By" logos that I've created, then I could help create other versions with text additions such as, "Supporters of". If you have a text addition in mind, please feel free to suggest it. I'd be happy to help compile a list of text additions and I can request for approval by PMC.
I'd suggest cleaning up the "Graphics and Resources" page [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Graphics+and+Resources] and adding the new "Powered By" logos there along with a link to a policy page. As Shane had mentioned, "Must have a policy page on the project's website noting where their Powered By logo may be used by third parties without permission. Final review must include VP Brand or VP Legal before calling policy official."
I can provide the vector files, RGB#s and PMS colors as well.
Any thoughts/suggestions or are welcome!
Thanks,
Karen
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Lehnardt [mailto:jan@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 10:03 AM
To: trademarks@apache.org
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org; Karen Vuong
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
On 17 Apr 2014, at 22:52 , Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> Excellent! I've been waiting for some projects to actually work on Powered By logos, so this is great - and will take a little thought.
We had done these for CouchDB ages ago: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/supplement/support-logo/ - I'm not sure if we had any trademarks counsel back then, but I just wanted to show them as examples.
We don't do a very good job of advertising them though :)
Best
Jan
--
>
> Short answer: yes, as long as the powered by variant of the logo makes sense from the ways that you want third parties to use it, then make a proposal and we'll approve it. I'm confident marketing@cloudstack can figure out the right kind of design/text you need.
>
> ----
>
> Fundamentally, the "Powered By" concept is similar to Intel Inside(r) - that is, an official project logo that is clearly related to, but not the same as the underlying Apache product's logo. This Powered By logo would be licensed very liberally for easy re-use by all sorts of organizations using that Apache product.
>
> The only reason we call it Powered By is because the original concept came from the Apache HTTP Server project long, long ago.
>
> So let's think about fundamentals (which obviously should get posted under /foundation/marks):
>
> - Design process is run by the PMC who may accept any design that the ASF can have trademark rights to and follows applicable policies.
>
> - Any Powered By logo is a trademark of the ASF, held on behalf of the project. Graphic artists must be willing to give the ASF trademark rights and potentially copyright to the logo (we are happy to give a license back to artist and give them credit, but to preserve trademark rights we may need copyright assignment).
>
> - Must be different than the official product logo.
>
> - Must be clearly listed as an official Powered By logo for the project.
>
> - Should be related to the official product logo.
>
> - Should not include the feather unless the official product logo
> already has one. (comments on this one?)
>
> - Should suggest the operational relationship to where the logo is
> used: that is, the graphical logo or additional text displayed on it
> should suggest the relationship between the Apache product and the
> third party places where the logo is used. (Powered By... the Apache
> HTTP Server; plugin For Apache CloudStack, etc.)
>
> - May include text to make the relationship clear, but does not need to.
>
> - "Powered By" and "For" are preapproved as text additions if desired. Other text additions may be requested by any PMC for Brand approval. If you have some sort of phrase that makes sense for your product and the ways that your product is used (plugins, frameworks, consultants, trainers, whatever), let trademarks@ know and we'll approve it.
>
> - Must not imply organizational endorsement or affiliation from the ASF or the Apache project. Must not imply a controlling relationship, or other influence that may detract from the Apache project's independent PMC governance model.
>
> - Must have a policy page on the project's website noting where their Powered By logo may be used by third parties without permission. Final review must include VP Brand or VP Legal before calling policy official.
>
> - Must not include the word "Sponsor" without approval from VP,
> Fundraising. That is, ensure this doesn't improperly imply a
> sponsorship or funding relationship that conflicts or is confusingly
> similar to http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html
>
> What did I miss? Anything seem off or needing changes? Obviously, this needs to be cleaned up and include some rationale before posting on the a.o site.
>
> - Shane
>
> On 4/17/14 1:29 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> (note mixed public / private lists)
>>
>> trademarks@ folks (Shane in particular) - have any thoughts about the
>> point raised by Giles below? From a trademark protection
>> perspective, is it fair to consider other wording beyond "powered by"?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Giles Sirett
>> <giles.sirett@shapeblue.com <ma...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Karen and I had a chat about this at collab____
>>
>> As well as "powered by", are we able to do a "proud supporters of"
>> logo ?____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> My logic is that many SP's don't want to actually say their infa is
>> powered by any particular software (it would be great if they did,
>> but being pragmatic here) however they may go for this
>> altenrtive.____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Also, "powered by" limits the logo to SP's - consultancies & SI's
>> aren't really powered by ACS____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> This **may** be something that needs to be discussed at a trademark
>> level as, I guess, some folks may feel that the word "supporter" may
>> imply a relationship with the project____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Thoughts, comments, ideas ??____
>>
>> Kind Regards____
>>
>> Giles____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <tel:%2B44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111
>> 2055 <tel:%2B44%20796%20111%202055> ____
>>
>> Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com <ma...@shapeblue.com>____
>> *From:*ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>]
>> *Sent:* 17 April 2014 18:05
>> *To:* marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> <ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>>
>> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
>> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
>> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>>
>> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>>
>> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>>
>> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
>> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.____
>>
>> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:____
>>
>> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I've dropped dev@)____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> I'm bumping this thread as I don't think we got a final answer
>> (I don't see one)____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std
>> Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I
>> think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF
>> project?).____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Attaching my attempt: uses "official" fonts, current colors, is
>> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
>> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size...) 3
>> color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal
>> and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at
>> doing a "knockout" version (black&white for 1 color printing)
>> but the dual tones on the monkey means that'll take a little
>> more time.____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let's get this one wrapped
>> up!____
>
> ... previous threads snipped
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 17 Apr 2014, at 22:52 , Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> Excellent! I've been waiting for some projects to actually work on Powered By logos, so this is great - and will take a little thought.
We had done these for CouchDB ages ago: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/supplement/support-logo/ — I’m not sure if we had any trademarks counsel back then, but I just wanted to show them as examples.
We don’t do a very good job of advertising them though :)
Best
Jan
--
>
> Short answer: yes, as long as the powered by variant of the logo makes sense from the ways that you want third parties to use it, then make a proposal and we'll approve it. I'm confident marketing@cloudstack can figure out the right kind of design/text you need.
>
> ----
>
> Fundamentally, the "Powered By" concept is similar to Intel Inside(r) - that is, an official project logo that is clearly related to, but not the same as the underlying Apache product's logo. This Powered By logo would be licensed very liberally for easy re-use by all sorts of organizations using that Apache product.
>
> The only reason we call it Powered By is because the original concept came from the Apache HTTP Server project long, long ago.
>
> So let's think about fundamentals (which obviously should get posted under /foundation/marks):
>
> - Design process is run by the PMC who may accept any design that the ASF can have trademark rights to and follows applicable policies.
>
> - Any Powered By logo is a trademark of the ASF, held on behalf of the project. Graphic artists must be willing to give the ASF trademark rights and potentially copyright to the logo (we are happy to give a license back to artist and give them credit, but to preserve trademark rights we may need copyright assignment).
>
> - Must be different than the official product logo.
>
> - Must be clearly listed as an official Powered By logo for the project.
>
> - Should be related to the official product logo.
>
> - Should not include the feather unless the official product logo already has one. (comments on this one?)
>
> - Should suggest the operational relationship to where the logo is used: that is, the graphical logo or additional text displayed on it should suggest the relationship between the Apache product and the third party places where the logo is used. (Powered By... the Apache HTTP Server; plugin For Apache CloudStack, etc.)
>
> - May include text to make the relationship clear, but does not need to.
>
> - "Powered By" and "For" are preapproved as text additions if desired. Other text additions may be requested by any PMC for Brand approval. If you have some sort of phrase that makes sense for your product and the ways that your product is used (plugins, frameworks, consultants, trainers, whatever), let trademarks@ know and we'll approve it.
>
> - Must not imply organizational endorsement or affiliation from the ASF or the Apache project. Must not imply a controlling relationship, or other influence that may detract from the Apache project's independent PMC governance model.
>
> - Must have a policy page on the project's website noting where their Powered By logo may be used by third parties without permission. Final review must include VP Brand or VP Legal before calling policy official.
>
> - Must not include the word "Sponsor" without approval from VP, Fundraising. That is, ensure this doesn't improperly imply a sponsorship or funding relationship that conflicts or is confusingly similar to http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html
>
> What did I miss? Anything seem off or needing changes? Obviously, this needs to be cleaned up and include some rationale before posting on the a.o site.
>
> - Shane
>
> On 4/17/14 1:29 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> (note mixed public / private lists)
>>
>> trademarks@ folks (Shane in particular) - have any thoughts about the
>> point raised by Giles below? From a trademark protection perspective,
>> is it fair to consider other wording beyond "powered by"?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Giles Sirett
>> <giles.sirett@shapeblue.com <ma...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Karen and I had a chat about this at collab____
>>
>> As well as “powered by”, are we able to do a “proud supporters of”
>> logo ?____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> My logic is that many SP’s don’t want to actually say their infa is
>> powered by any particular software (it would be great if they did,
>> but being pragmatic here) however they may go for this altenrtive.____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Also, “powered by” limits the logo to SP’s – consultancies & SI’s
>> aren’t really powered by ACS____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> This **may** be something that needs to be discussed at a trademark
>> level as, I guess, some folks may feel that the word “supporter” may
>> imply a relationship with the project____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Thoughts, comments, ideas ??____
>>
>> Kind Regards____
>>
>> Giles____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <tel:%2B44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111
>> 2055 <tel:%2B44%20796%20111%202055> ____
>>
>> Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com <ma...@shapeblue.com>____
>> *From:*ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>]
>> *Sent:* 17 April 2014 18:05
>> *To:* marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> <ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>>
>> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
>> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
>> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>>
>> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>>
>> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>>
>> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
>> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.____
>>
>> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:____
>>
>> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer
>> (I don’t see one)____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std
>> Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I
>> think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF
>> project?).____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
>> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
>> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3
>> color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal
>> and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at
>> doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing)
>> but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little
>> more time.____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!____
>
> ... previous threads snipped
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org>.
Excellent! I've been waiting for some projects to actually work on
Powered By logos, so this is great - and will take a little thought.
Short answer: yes, as long as the powered by variant of the logo makes
sense from the ways that you want third parties to use it, then make a
proposal and we'll approve it. I'm confident marketing@cloudstack can
figure out the right kind of design/text you need.
----
Fundamentally, the "Powered By" concept is similar to Intel Inside(r) -
that is, an official project logo that is clearly related to, but not
the same as the underlying Apache product's logo. This Powered By logo
would be licensed very liberally for easy re-use by all sorts of
organizations using that Apache product.
The only reason we call it Powered By is because the original concept
came from the Apache HTTP Server project long, long ago.
So let's think about fundamentals (which obviously should get posted
under /foundation/marks):
- Design process is run by the PMC who may accept any design that the
ASF can have trademark rights to and follows applicable policies.
- Any Powered By logo is a trademark of the ASF, held on behalf of the
project. Graphic artists must be willing to give the ASF trademark
rights and potentially copyright to the logo (we are happy to give a
license back to artist and give them credit, but to preserve trademark
rights we may need copyright assignment).
- Must be different than the official product logo.
- Must be clearly listed as an official Powered By logo for the project.
- Should be related to the official product logo.
- Should not include the feather unless the official product logo
already has one. (comments on this one?)
- Should suggest the operational relationship to where the logo is used:
that is, the graphical logo or additional text displayed on it should
suggest the relationship between the Apache product and the third party
places where the logo is used. (Powered By... the Apache HTTP Server;
plugin For Apache CloudStack, etc.)
- May include text to make the relationship clear, but does not need to.
- "Powered By" and "For" are preapproved as text additions if desired.
Other text additions may be requested by any PMC for Brand approval. If
you have some sort of phrase that makes sense for your product and the
ways that your product is used (plugins, frameworks, consultants,
trainers, whatever), let trademarks@ know and we'll approve it.
- Must not imply organizational endorsement or affiliation from the ASF
or the Apache project. Must not imply a controlling relationship, or
other influence that may detract from the Apache project's independent
PMC governance model.
- Must have a policy page on the project's website noting where their
Powered By logo may be used by third parties without permission. Final
review must include VP Brand or VP Legal before calling policy official.
- Must not include the word "Sponsor" without approval from VP,
Fundraising. That is, ensure this doesn't improperly imply a
sponsorship or funding relationship that conflicts or is confusingly
similar to http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html
What did I miss? Anything seem off or needing changes? Obviously, this
needs to be cleaned up and include some rationale before posting on the
a.o site.
- Shane
On 4/17/14 1:29 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> (note mixed public / private lists)
>
> trademarks@ folks (Shane in particular) - have any thoughts about the
> point raised by Giles below? From a trademark protection perspective,
> is it fair to consider other wording beyond "powered by"?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Giles Sirett
> <giles.sirett@shapeblue.com <ma...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>
> Karen and I had a chat about this at collab____
>
> As well as “powered by”, are we able to do a “proud supporters of”
> logo ?____
>
> __ __
>
> My logic is that many SP’s don’t want to actually say their infa is
> powered by any particular software (it would be great if they did,
> but being pragmatic here) however they may go for this altenrtive.____
>
> __ __
>
> Also, “powered by” limits the logo to SP’s – consultancies & SI’s
> aren’t really powered by ACS____
>
> __ __
>
> This **may** be something that needs to be discussed at a trademark
> level as, I guess, some folks may feel that the word “supporter” may
> imply a relationship with the project____
>
> __ __
>
> Thoughts, comments, ideas ??____
>
> Kind Regards____
>
> Giles____
>
> __ __
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <tel:%2B44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111
> 2055 <tel:%2B44%20796%20111%202055> ____
>
> Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com <ma...@shapeblue.com>____
> *From:*ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* 17 April 2014 18:05
> *To:* marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> <ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack____
>
> __ __
>
> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>
> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>
> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>
> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>
> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.____
>
> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:____
>
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)____
>
> __ __
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer
> (I don’t see one)____
>
> __ __
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std
> Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I
> think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF
> project?).____
>
> __ __
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3
> color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)____
>
> __ __
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal
> and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at
> doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing)
> but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little
> more time.____
>
> __ __
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!____
... previous threads snipped
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@apache.org>.
(note mixed public / private lists)
trademarks@ folks (Shane in particular) - have any thoughts about the point
raised by Giles below? From a trademark protection perspective, is it fair
to consider other wording beyond "powered by"?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Giles Sirett <gi...@shapeblue.com>wrote:
> Karen and I had a chat about this at collab
>
> As well as “powered by”, are we able to do a “proud supporters of” logo ?
>
>
>
> My logic is that many SP’s don’t want to actually say their infa is
> powered by any particular software (it would be great if they did, but
> being pragmatic here) however they may go for this altenrtive.
>
>
>
> Also, “powered by” limits the logo to SP’s – consultancies & SI’s aren’t
> really powered by ACS
>
>
>
> This **may** be something that needs to be discussed at a trademark level
> as, I guess, some folks may feel that the word “supporter” may imply a
> relationship with the project
>
>
>
> Thoughts, comments, ideas ??
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Giles
>
>
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
>
> Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com <gi...@shapeblue.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 17 April 2014 18:05
> *To:* marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>
>
>
> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>
> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller in
> size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font similar to
> apachecloudstack.
>
> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>
> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>
> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
>
> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
>
>
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I don’t
> see one)
>
>
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy
> [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should
> consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
>
>
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is readable
> down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should
> probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color (you could print as 2 color
> with halftones)
>
>
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and
> square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a
> “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on
> the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
>
>
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
>
>
>
>
>
> John
>
> 1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
>
> 2:
> http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
>
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> <la...@gmail.com> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>
> even
>
> the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>
> spot
>
> the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>
> CloudStack
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my version:
> - SVG format as you requested
> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>
> prefer
>
> few
> colors for such pictures
> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>
> to
>
> fit
> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> monkey is übercool anyway)
> - if no monkey, then cloud
> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> difficult to read in such a small place
> - see attached file :)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>
> be
>
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>
> cute.)
>
>
> Two things -
>
> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>
> intentional, not
>
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>
> screen... :)
>
> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>
> shouldn't
>
> be added in... legal, etc)?
>
> -robyn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> have a great opportunity for you :)
>
> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>
> is
>
> also attractive.
>
> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>
>
> A couple of constraints:
> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> will make life simpler)
> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>
> to
>
> scale/etc)
> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> that
> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>
> around
>
> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> that
> sentence makes it out to be.)
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> --David
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
>
>
>
> Stratosec <http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
>
> o: 415.315.9385
>
> @johnlkinsella <http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
>
>
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
>
>
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
>
RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Giles Sirett <gi...@shapeblue.com>.
Karen and I had a chat about this at collab
As well as "powered by", are we able to do a "proud supporters of" logo ?
My logic is that many SP's don't want to actually say their infa is powered by any particular software (it would be great if they did, but being pragmatic here) however they may go for this altenrtive.
Also, "powered by" limits the logo to SP's - consultancies & SI's aren't really powered by ACS
This *may* be something that needs to be discussed at a trademark level as, I guess, some folks may feel that the word "supporter" may imply a relationship with the project
Thoughts, comments, ideas ??
Kind Regards
Giles
D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com<ma...@shapeblue.com>
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 April 2014 18:05
To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font similar to apachecloudstack.
another way to do this is to look at header image:
http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
(This is a marketing/branding thing, so I've dropped dev@)
I'm bumping this thread as I don't think we got a final answer (I don't see one)
Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
Attaching my attempt: uses "official" fonts, current colors, is readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size...) 3 color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a "knockout" version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on the monkey means that'll take a little more time.
Anyways, give me thoughts, and let's get this one wrapped up!
[cid:image001.jpg@01CF5A69.AC6F6080]
John
1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
2: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot
the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
prefer
few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
to
fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
be
hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
intentional, not
intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
shouldn't
be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
A couple of constraints:
* Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
will make life simpler)
* Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
to
scale/etc)
* Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
that
copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
around
trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
that
sentence makes it out to be.)
Anyone interested?
--David
--
EOF
--
EOF
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by John Kinsella <jl...@stratosec.co>.
As David said earlier in the thread, we do not want the feather in the logo.
I tinkered with spreading out “powered by” along with lower case - personally I didn’t like the look. As you increase character spacing you decrease readability.
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev <il...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font similar to apachecloudstack.
another way to do this is to look at header image:
http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
(This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I don’t see one)
Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
<Mail Attachment.jpeg>
John
1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
2: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot
the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
prefer
few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
to
fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
be
hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
intentional, not
intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
shouldn't
be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
A couple of constraints:
* Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
will make life simpler)
* Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
to
scale/etc)
* Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
that
copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
around
trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
that
sentence makes it out to be.)
Anyone interested?
--David
--
EOF
--
EOF
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the comments.
For the design itself, i think we should work with a designer. Yes it
costs money, but they can make a proper style guide. I say we make this
a first tangible item for the Apache/CloudStack/Whatever Foundation.
Hope i did not step on any designer toes with this opinion. I appreciate
the efforts that go into visualizing great stuff.
Thanks, Arjan
> John Kinsella <ma...@stratosec.co>
> 17 Apr 2014 19:57
> +1 exactly where I was going with it. Then we need on a page on the
> website, not in the wiki.
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Mark Hinkle
> <Ma...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> I would add this. I think you need a vector logo that is both longer
> than high as well as a square logo so that it works in a multitude of
> places and should resize appropriately. I would also encourage both a
> pictorial and text only logo so that people can use as needed. I’d
> also specific color guidelines with RGB #s and a greyscale treatment.
> If you give the guidelines for the most popular use cases you won’t
> have people bastardizing the logos.
>
> Regards, Mark
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:31 PM, John Kinsella
> <jl...@stratosec.co>>
> wrote:
>
> and the reason I didn’t do smaller size is I want the logo to be
> readable when, say, at 30% of the size of what I sent out
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev
> <il...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>
> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>
> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>
> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>
> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
>
> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I
> don’t see one)
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy
> [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should
> consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color
> (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and
> square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a
> “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual
> tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
>
> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>
> John
> 1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
> 2:
> http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan
> <er...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer
> <ki...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
> <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> <la...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even
> the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> spot
> the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland
> <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron
> <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak"
> <la...@gmail.com>
> To:
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc:
> marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my version:
> - SVG format as you requested
> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> prefer
> few
> colors for such pictures
> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> to
> fit
> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> monkey is übercool anyway)
> - if no monkey, then cloud
> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> difficult to read in such a small place
> - see attached file :)
>
> Hi,
>
> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> be
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> cute.)
>
> Two things -
>
> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> intentional, not
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> screen... :)
> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't
> be added in... legal, etc)?
>
> -robyn
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
> <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> have a great opportunity for you :)
>
> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> is
> also attractive.
>
> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>
> A couple of constraints:
> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> will make life simpler)
> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> to
> scale/etc)
> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> that
> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> around
> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> that
> sentence makes it out to be.)
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> --David
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
> Mark Hinkle <ma...@citrix.com>
> 17 Apr 2014 19:44
> I would add this. I think you need a vector logo that is both longer
> than high as well as a square logo so that it works in a multitude of
> places and should resize appropriately. I would also encourage both a
> pictorial and text only logo so that people can use as needed. I’d
> also specific color guidelines with RGB #s and a greyscale treatment.
> If you give the guidelines for the most popular use cases you won’t
> have people bastardizing the logos.
>
> Regards, Mark
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:31 PM, John Kinsella
> <jl...@stratosec.co>> wrote:
>
> and the reason I didn’t do smaller size is I want the logo to be
> readable when, say, at 30% of the size of what I sent out
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev
> <il...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>
> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>
> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>
> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>
> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
>
> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I
> don’t see one)
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy
> [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should
> consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color
> (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and
> square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a
> “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual
> tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
>
> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>
> John
> 1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
> 2:
> http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan
> <er...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer
> <ki...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
> <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> <la...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even
> the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> spot
> the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland
> <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron
> <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak"
> <la...@gmail.com>
> To:
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc:
> marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my version:
> - SVG format as you requested
> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> prefer
> few
> colors for such pictures
> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> to
> fit
> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> monkey is übercool anyway)
> - if no monkey, then cloud
> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> difficult to read in such a small place
> - see attached file :)
>
> Hi,
>
> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> be
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> cute.)
>
> Two things -
>
> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> intentional, not
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> screen... :)
> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't
> be added in... legal, etc)?
>
> -robyn
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
> <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> have a great opportunity for you :)
>
> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> is
> also attractive.
>
> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>
> A couple of constraints:
> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> will make life simpler)
> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> to
> scale/etc)
> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> that
> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> around
> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> that
> sentence makes it out to be.)
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> --David
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
> John Kinsella <ma...@stratosec.co>
> 17 Apr 2014 19:31
> and the reason I didn’t do smaller size is I want the logo to be
> readable when, say, at 30% of the size of what I sent out
>
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev
> <il...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>
> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>
> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>
> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>
> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
>
> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I
> don’t see one)
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy
> [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should
> consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color
> (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and
> square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a
> “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual
> tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
>
> <Mail Attachment.jpeg>
>
> John
> 1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
> 2:
> http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan
> <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer
> <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
> <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even
> the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> spot
> the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland
> <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron
> <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak"
> <la...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc:
> marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my version:
> - SVG format as you requested
> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> prefer
> few
> colors for such pictures
> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> to
> fit
> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> monkey is übercool anyway)
> - if no monkey, then cloud
> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> difficult to read in such a small place
> - see attached file :)
>
> Hi,
>
> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> be
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> cute.)
>
> Two things -
>
> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> intentional, not
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> screen... :)
> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't
> be added in... legal, etc)?
>
> -robyn
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley
> <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> have a great opportunity for you :)
>
> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> is
> also attractive.
>
> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>
> A couple of constraints:
> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> will make life simpler)
> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> to
> scale/etc)
> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> that
> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> around
> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> that
> sentence makes it out to be.)
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> --David
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
>
> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
>
> ilya musayev <ma...@gmail.com>
> 17 Apr 2014 19:04
> I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
>
> powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a
> smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the
> font similar to apachecloudstack.
>
> another way to do this is to look at header image:
>
> http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
>
> I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
> feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
>
> On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>
> John Kinsella <ma...@stratosec.co>
> 17 Apr 2014 18:44
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I
> don’t see one)
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy
> [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should
> consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color
> (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and
> square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a
> “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual
> tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
>
>
> John
> 1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
> 2:
> http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
> <http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000>
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <eriarjan@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Stratosec <http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella <http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by John Kinsella <jl...@stratosec.co>.
+1 exactly where I was going with it. Then we need on a page on the website, not in the wiki.
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Mark Hinkle <Ma...@citrix.com>> wrote:
I would add this. I think you need a vector logo that is both longer than high as well as a square logo so that it works in a multitude of places and should resize appropriately. I would also encourage both a pictorial and text only logo so that people can use as needed. I’d also specific color guidelines with RGB #s and a greyscale treatment. If you give the guidelines for the most popular use cases you won’t have people bastardizing the logos.
Regards, Mark
On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:31 PM, John Kinsella <jl...@stratosec.co>> wrote:
and the reason I didn’t do smaller size is I want the logo to be readable when, say, at 30% of the size of what I sent out
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev <il...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font similar to apachecloudstack.
another way to do this is to look at header image:
http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
(This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I don’t see one)
Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
<Mail Attachment.jpeg>
John
1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
2: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot
the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
prefer
few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
to
fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
be
hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
intentional, not
intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
shouldn't
be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
A couple of constraints:
* Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
will make life simpler)
* Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
to
scale/etc)
* Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
that
copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
around
trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
that
sentence makes it out to be.)
Anyone interested?
--David
--
EOF
--
EOF
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Mark Hinkle <Ma...@citrix.com>.
I would add this. I think you need a vector logo that is both longer than high as well as a square logo so that it works in a multitude of places and should resize appropriately. I would also encourage both a pictorial and text only logo so that people can use as needed. I’d also specific color guidelines with RGB #s and a greyscale treatment. If you give the guidelines for the most popular use cases you won’t have people bastardizing the logos.
Regards, Mark
On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:31 PM, John Kinsella <jl...@stratosec.co>> wrote:
and the reason I didn’t do smaller size is I want the logo to be readable when, say, at 30% of the size of what I sent out
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev <il...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font similar to apachecloudstack.
another way to do this is to look at header image:
http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
(This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I don’t see one)
Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
<Mail Attachment.jpeg>
John
1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
2: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot
the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
prefer
few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
to
fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
be
hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
intentional, not
intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
shouldn't
be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
A couple of constraints:
* Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
will make life simpler)
* Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
to
scale/etc)
* Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
that
copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
around
trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
that
sentence makes it out to be.)
Anyone interested?
--David
--
EOF
--
EOF
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by John Kinsella <jl...@stratosec.co>.
and the reason I didn’t do smaller size is I want the logo to be readable when, say, at 30% of the size of what I sent out
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:04 AM, ilya musayev <il...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font similar to apachecloudstack.
another way to do this is to look at header image:
http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
(This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I don’t see one)
Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
<Mail Attachment.jpeg>
John
1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
2: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot
the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
prefer
few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
to
fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
be
hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
intentional, not
intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
shouldn't
be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
A couple of constraints:
* Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
will make life simpler)
* Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
to
scale/etc)
* Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
that
copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
around
trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
that
sentence makes it out to be.)
Anyone interested?
--David
--
EOF
--
EOF
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by ilya musayev <il...@gmail.com>.
I dont have AI editor, but my 2 cents:
powered by - would probably look better lower cased, bold and a smaller
in size - but more widely spaced . Perhaps you can match the font
similar to apachecloudstack.
another way to do this is to look at header image:
http://www.cloudsand.com/content/
I just realized my image is missing word Apache, though i do have a
feather. Need to redo it. :(( maybe i'll post some samples.
On 4/17/14, 12:44 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> (This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
>
> I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I
> don’t see one)
>
> Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy
> [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should
> consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
>
> Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is
> readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding
> guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color
> (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
>
> We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and
> square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a
> “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual
> tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
>
> Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
>
>
> John
> 1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
> 2:
> http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <eriarjan@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <kirk.jantzer@gmail.com
>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey.
>>> I think
>>> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
>>> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
>>> idea)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Kirk Jantzer
>>> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>> <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>>>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>>>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>>>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>>>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>>>
>>>> sorry to nag,
>>>> Daan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>>>> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sending version 0.0.3:
>>>>> - Complete monkey added
>>>>> - "Apache" added
>>>>> - Clouds more like the original logo
>>>>> This also comes with some cons:
>>>>> - 4 colors
>>>>> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>>>>> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>>>> even
>>>>> the monkey is so-so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
>>>>> up to
>>>>> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>>>>>
>>>>> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
>>>>> svg,
>>>> spot
>>>>> the difference :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Your feedback is welcome!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Laszlo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland
>>>>> <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like,
>>>>>> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>>>>>> I think it must even.
>>>>>> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>>>> CloudStack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is my version:
>>>>>>>> - SVG format as you requested
>>>>>>>> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>> colors for such pictures
>>>>>>>> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>>>> to
>>>>>>>> fit
>>>>>>>> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little
>>>>>>>> detail (the
>>>>>>>> monkey is übercool anyway)
>>>>>>>> - if no monkey, then cloud
>>>>>>>> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>>>>>>>> difficult to read in such a small place
>>>>>>>> - see attached file :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>>>> be
>>>>>>> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>>>> cute.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two things -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
>>>>>>> compared
>>>>>>> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>>>> intentional, not
>>>>>>> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>>>> screen... :)
>>>>>>> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we
>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>>> be added in... legal, etc)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -robyn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi folks:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>>>>>>>>> have a great opportunity for you :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> also attractive.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>>>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A couple of constraints:
>>>>>>>>> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>>>>>>>>> will make life simpler)
>>>>>>>>> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> scale/etc)
>>>>>>>>> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>>>> around
>>>>>>>>> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> sentence makes it out to be.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyone interested?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --David
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> EOF
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> EOF
>>>>
>
> Stratosec <http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella <http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by John Kinsella <jl...@stratosec.co>.
(This is a marketing/branding thing, so I’ve dropped dev@)
I’m bumping this thread as I don’t think we got a final answer (I don’t see one)
Arjan - according to the .ai files on [1] the font is Avenir Std Heavy [2], which is not an open source font and therefore I think we should consider changing (Maybe we have to as an ASF project?).
Attaching my attempt: uses “official” fonts, current colors, is readable down to about 150px width on my screen (in branding guidelines we should probably prescribe minimum logo size…) 3 color (you could print as 2 color with halftones)
We should provide at least 2 versions of the logo - a horizontal and square version for various uses. I attempted a quick try at doing a “knockout” version (black&white for 1 color printing) but the dual tones on the monkey means that’ll take a little more time.
Anyways, give me thoughts, and let’s get this one wrapped up!
[cid:3D961AEE-AA37-49A1-9E85-CF3423043600@thrashyour.com]
John
1: http://cloudstack.apache.org/trademark-guidelines.html
2: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayFont&code=AVEQ10085000
On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Arjan <er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot
the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
CloudStack
Hi,
Here is my version:
- SVG format as you requested
- Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
prefer
few
colors for such pictures
- Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
to
fit
into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
monkey is übercool anyway)
- if no monkey, then cloud
- only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
difficult to read in such a small place
- see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
be
hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
intentional, not
intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
shouldn't
be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
Hi folks:
If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
have a great opportunity for you :)
CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
is
also attractive.
A couple examples of powered by logos:
http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
A couple of constraints:
* Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
will make life simpler)
* Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
to
scale/etc)
* Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
that
copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
around
trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
that
sentence makes it out to be.)
Anyone interested?
--David
--
EOF
--
EOF
Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Arjan <er...@gmail.com>.
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sending version 0.0.3:
>>> - Complete monkey added
>>> - "Apache" added
>>> - Clouds more like the original logo
>>> This also comes with some cons:
>>> - 4 colors
>>> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>>> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>>> the monkey is so-so.
>>>
>>> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>>> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>>>
>>> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>>> the difference :-)
>>>
>>> Your feedback is welcome!
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Laszlo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I like,
>>>> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>>>> I think it must even.
>>>> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is my version:
>>>>>> - SVG format as you requested
>>>>>> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> colors for such pictures
>>>>>> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>>>>>> fit
>>>>>> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>>>>>> monkey is übercool anyway)
>>>>>> - if no monkey, then cloud
>>>>>> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>>>>>> difficult to read in such a small place
>>>>>> - see attached file :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>>>>> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Two things -
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>>>>> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>>>>> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>>>>> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>>>>> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>>>>> be added in... legal, etc)?
>>>>>
>>>>> -robyn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi folks:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>>>>>>> have a great opportunity for you :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>> is
>>>>>>> also attractive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A couple of constraints:
>>>>>>> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>>>>>>> will make life simpler)
>>>>>>> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>> to
>>>>>>> scale/etc)
>>>>>>> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> around
>>>>>>> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> sentence makes it out to be.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone interested?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EOF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> EOF
>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Arjan <er...@gmail.com>.
As a newbie on the list. What is the original font used?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 dec. 2013, at 00:11, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sending version 0.0.3:
>>> - Complete monkey added
>>> - "Apache" added
>>> - Clouds more like the original logo
>>> This also comes with some cons:
>>> - 4 colors
>>> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>>> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>>> the monkey is so-so.
>>>
>>> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>>> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>>>
>>> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>>> the difference :-)
>>>
>>> Your feedback is welcome!
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Laszlo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I like,
>>>> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>>>> I think it must even.
>>>> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is my version:
>>>>>> - SVG format as you requested
>>>>>> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> colors for such pictures
>>>>>> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>>>>>> fit
>>>>>> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>>>>>> monkey is übercool anyway)
>>>>>> - if no monkey, then cloud
>>>>>> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>>>>>> difficult to read in such a small place
>>>>>> - see attached file :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>>>>> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Two things -
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>>>>> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>>>>> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>>>>> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>>>>> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>>>>> be added in... legal, etc)?
>>>>>
>>>>> -robyn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi folks:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>>>>>>> have a great opportunity for you :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
>> is
>>>>>>> also attractive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A couple examples of powered by logos:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A couple of constraints:
>>>>>>> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>>>>>>> will make life simpler)
>>>>>>> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
>> to
>>>>>>> scale/etc)
>>>>>>> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
>> around
>>>>>>> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> sentence makes it out to be.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone interested?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EOF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> EOF
>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com>.
retry
> Sebastien Goasguen <ma...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 22:00
> Arjan, your attachment was stripped.
>
>
> Arjan Eriks <ma...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 16:12
> Kirk e.a.,
>
> I made an attempt to see if that could work out Kirk, see attached
> (only for reference purposes, this is not design stuff). Please check.
> I sized it small.
>
> But in general you see two types of usage of "Powered by" logos. 1) as
> an extra glued to the bottom of a different companies logo and 2) as
> some sort of seal (like intel inside). Shouldnt we make both versions?
>
> Then as a general feedback on the submission (and mine attempt as
> well). I do feel that we should make this first time right. So lets
> please keep iterating and ask for more submissions. Our image is
> important.
>
> Thanks, A
>
>
>
> Kirk Jantzer <ma...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 00:11
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
>
> Daan Hoogland <ma...@gmail.com>
> 4 Dec 2013 22:34
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> Laszlo Hornyak <ma...@gmail.com>
> 4 Dec 2013 22:00
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up
> to date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
> svg, spot the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by shashi dahal <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Guys,
I want to develop out a few variations this weekend and upload.
Can someone let me know the font used by cloudstack ? and does the same
need to be the same font?
I will try to come up with multiple variations and on multiple sizes.
Cheers,
Shashi
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> and attempt 2 (although this is stolen from ubuntu) just to get the
> thoughts going.
>
> Kirk, I think i know what you mean. Do you have a visual of it? Might seem
> like a good idea, although i wonder how it lookslike in 150px width.
>
> Rgds, Arjan
>
> Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 22:00
> Arjan, your attachment was stripped.
>
>
> Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 16:12
> Kirk e.a.,
>
> I made an attempt to see if that could work out Kirk, see attached (only
> for reference purposes, this is not design stuff). Please check. I sized it
> small.
>
> But in general you see two types of usage of "Powered by" logos. 1) as an
> extra glued to the bottom of a different companies logo and 2) as some sort
> of seal (like intel inside). Shouldnt we make both versions?
>
> Then as a general feedback on the submission (and mine attempt as well). I
> do feel that we should make this first time right. So lets please keep
> iterating and ask for more submissions. Our image is important.
>
> Thanks, A
>
>
>
> Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 00:11
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
>
> Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> 4 Dec 2013 22:34
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>
> 4 Dec 2013 22:00
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> spot the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
>
--
Cheers,
Sashi Dahal
http://shashi.org/
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com>.
and attempt 2 (although this is stolen from ubuntu) just to get the
thoughts going.
Kirk, I think i know what you mean. Do you have a visual of it? Might
seem like a good idea, although i wonder how it lookslike in 150px width.
Rgds, Arjan
> Sebastien Goasguen <ma...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 22:00
> Arjan, your attachment was stripped.
>
>
> Arjan Eriks <ma...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 16:12
> Kirk e.a.,
>
> I made an attempt to see if that could work out Kirk, see attached
> (only for reference purposes, this is not design stuff). Please check.
> I sized it small.
>
> But in general you see two types of usage of "Powered by" logos. 1) as
> an extra glued to the bottom of a different companies logo and 2) as
> some sort of seal (like intel inside). Shouldnt we make both versions?
>
> Then as a general feedback on the submission (and mine attempt as
> well). I do feel that we should make this first time right. So lets
> please keep iterating and ask for more submissions. Our image is
> important.
>
> Thanks, A
>
>
>
> Kirk Jantzer <ma...@gmail.com>
> 5 Dec 2013 00:11
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
> think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
>
> Daan Hoogland <ma...@gmail.com>
> 4 Dec 2013 22:34
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> Laszlo Hornyak <ma...@gmail.com>
> 4 Dec 2013 22:00
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up
> to date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
> svg, spot the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>.
Arjan, your attachment was stripped.
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kirk e.a.,
>
> I made an attempt to see if that could work out Kirk, see attached (only for reference purposes, this is not design stuff). Please check. I sized it small.
>
> But in general you see two types of usage of "Powered by" logos. 1) as an extra glued to the bottom of a different companies logo and 2) as some sort of seal (like intel inside). Shouldnt we make both versions?
>
> Then as a general feedback on the submission (and mine attempt as well). I do feel that we should make this first time right. So lets please keep iterating and ask for more submissions. Our image is important.
>
> Thanks, A
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> > stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> > right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> > the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> > the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> >
> > sorry to nag,
> > Daan
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> > <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > > - Complete monkey added
> > > - "Apache" added
> > > - Clouds more like the original logo
> > > This also comes with some cons:
> > > - 4 colors
> > > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> > > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> > even
> > > the monkey is so-so.
> > >
> > > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> > > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> > >
> > > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> > spot
> > > the difference :-)
> > >
> > > Your feedback is welcome!
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Laszlo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I like,
> > >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> > >> I think it must even.
> > >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> > CloudStack
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hi,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Here is my version:
> > >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> > >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> > prefer
> > >> >> few
> > >> >> colors for such pictures
> > >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> > to
> > >> >> fit
> > >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> > >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> > >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > >> >> - see attached file :)
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> > be
> > >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> > cute.)
> > >> >
> > >> > Two things -
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> > >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> > intentional, not
> > >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> > screen... :)
> > >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> > >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> > shouldn't
> > >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> > >> >
> > >> > -robyn
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Hi folks:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> > >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> > is
> > >> >> > also attractive.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> > >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> > >> >> > will make life simpler)
> > >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> > to
> > >> >> > scale/etc)
> > >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> > >> >> > that
> > >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> > around
> > >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> > >> >> > that
> > >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Anyone interested?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > --David
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >>
> > >> >> EOF
> > >> >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > EOF
> >
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Arjan Eriks <er...@gmail.com>.
Kirk e.a.,
I made an attempt to see if that could work out Kirk, see attached (only
for reference purposes, this is not design stuff). Please check. I sized it
small.
But in general you see two types of usage of "Powered by" logos. 1) as an
extra glued to the bottom of a different companies logo and 2) as some sort
of seal (like intel inside). Shouldnt we make both versions?
Then as a general feedback on the submission (and mine attempt as well). I
do feel that we should make this first time right. So lets please keep
iterating and ask for more submissions. Our image is important.
Thanks, A
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> > stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> > right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> > the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> > the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
> >
> > sorry to nag,
> > Daan
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> > <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > > - Complete monkey added
> > > - "Apache" added
> > > - Clouds more like the original logo
> > > This also comes with some cons:
> > > - 4 colors
> > > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> > > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> > even
> > > the monkey is so-so.
> > >
> > > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up
> to
> > > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> > >
> > > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> > spot
> > > the difference :-)
> > >
> > > Your feedback is welcome!
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Laszlo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I like,
> > >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> > >> I think it must even.
> > >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> > >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> > CloudStack
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hi,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Here is my version:
> > >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> > >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> > prefer
> > >> >> few
> > >> >> colors for such pictures
> > >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing
> needs
> > to
> > >> >> fit
> > >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail
> (the
> > >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> > >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> > >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> > >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> > >> >> - see attached file :)
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> > be
> > >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> > cute.)
> > >> >
> > >> > Two things -
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as
> compared
> > >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> > intentional, not
> > >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> > screen... :)
> > >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want
> to
> > >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> > shouldn't
> > >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> > >> >
> > >> > -robyn
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Hi folks:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none)
> I
> > >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> > is
> > >> >> > also attractive.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> > >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not;
> it
> > >> >> > will make life simpler)
> > >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows
> us
> > to
> > >> >> > scale/etc)
> > >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> > >> >> > that
> > >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> > around
> > >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> > >> >> > that
> > >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Anyone interested?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > --David
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >>
> > >> >> EOF
> > >> >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > EOF
> >
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>.
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > - Complete monkey added
> > - "Apache" added
> > - Clouds more like the original logo
> > This also comes with some cons:
> > - 4 colors
> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even
> > the monkey is so-so.
> >
> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> >
> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> spot
> > the difference :-)
> >
> > Your feedback is welcome!
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Laszlo
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I like,
> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> >> I think it must even.
> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Here is my version:
> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> prefer
> >> >> few
> >> >> colors for such pictures
> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> to
> >> >> fit
> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> >> - see attached file :)
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> be
> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> cute.)
> >> >
> >> > Two things -
> >> >
> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> intentional, not
> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> screen... :)
> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't
> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> >> >
> >> > -robyn
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> is
> >> >> > also attractive.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> to
> >> >> > scale/etc)
> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> around
> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --David
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> EOF
> >> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > EOF
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Kirk Jantzer <ki...@gmail.com>.
Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
idea)
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>
> sorry to nag,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
> <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sending version 0.0.3:
> > - Complete monkey added
> > - "Apache" added
> > - Clouds more like the original logo
> > This also comes with some cons:
> > - 4 colors
> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
> even
> > the monkey is so-so.
> >
> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
> >
> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
> spot
> > the difference :-)
> >
> > Your feedback is welcome!
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Laszlo
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I like,
> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> >> I think it must even.
> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
> CloudStack
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Here is my version:
> >> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
> prefer
> >> >> few
> >> >> colors for such pictures
> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
> to
> >> >> fit
> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> >> - see attached file :)
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
> be
> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
> cute.)
> >> >
> >> > Two things -
> >> >
> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
> intentional, not
> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
> screen... :)
> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't
> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
> >> >
> >> > -robyn
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and
> is
> >> >> > also attractive.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> >> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us
> to
> >> >> > scale/etc)
> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement
> around
> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --David
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> EOF
> >> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > EOF
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable, even
> the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg, spot
> the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I like,
>> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> I think it must even.
>> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Here is my version:
>> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer
>> >> few
>> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to
>> >> fit
>> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> - see attached file :)
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be
>> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
>> >
>> > Two things -
>> >
>> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not
>> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
>> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it shouldn't
>> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >
>> > -robyn
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >
>> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >
>> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
>> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >
>> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >
>> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
>> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>> >> > that
>> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
>> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>> >> > that
>> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >
>> >> > --David
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> EOF
>> >>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
sorry to nag,
Daan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
<la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending version 0.0.3:
> - Complete monkey added
> - "Apache" added
> - Clouds more like the original logo
> This also comes with some cons:
> - 4 colors
> - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
> but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable, even
> the monkey is so-so.
>
> Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
> date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>
> steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg, spot
> the difference :-)
>
> Your feedback is welcome!
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I like,
>> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> I think it must even.
>> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Here is my version:
>> >> - SVG format as you requested
>> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer
>> >> few
>> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to
>> >> fit
>> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> - see attached file :)
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be
>> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
>> >
>> > Two things -
>> >
>> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not
>> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
>> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it shouldn't
>> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >
>> > -robyn
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >
>> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >
>> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
>> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >
>> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >
>> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
>> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different
>> >> > that
>> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
>> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as
>> >> > that
>> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >
>> >> > --David
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> EOF
>> >>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable, even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here is my version:
> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer
> few
> >> colors for such pictures
> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to
> fit
> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> - see attached file :)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
> >
> > Two things -
> >
> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
> >
> > -robyn
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >
> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >
> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> >> > also attractive.
> >> >
> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >
> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >
> >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >
> >> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >
> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
> >> > scale/etc)
> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >
> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >
> >> > --David
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> EOF
> >>
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Laszlo Hornyak <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Sending version 0.0.3:
- Complete monkey added
- "Apache" added
- Clouds more like the original logo
This also comes with some cons:
- 4 colors
- lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable, even
the monkey is so-so.
Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
spot the difference :-)
Your feedback is welcome!
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I like,
> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
> I think it must even.
> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here is my version:
> >> - SVG format as you requested
> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer
> few
> >> colors for such pictures
> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to
> fit
> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
> >> - if no monkey, then cloud
> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> >> difficult to read in such a small place
> >> - see attached file :)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be
> hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
> >
> > Two things -
> >
> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
> with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not
> intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
> add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
> shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
> >
> > -robyn
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >
> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >> >
> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> >> > also attractive.
> >> >
> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >> >
> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >> >
> >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >> >
> >> >
> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >> >
> >> > A couple of constraints:
> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> >> > will make life simpler)
> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
> >> > scale/etc)
> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >> >
> >> > Anyone interested?
> >> >
> >> > --David
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> EOF
> >>
>
--
EOF
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is my version:
>> - SVG format as you requested
>> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer few
>> colors for such pictures
>> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to fit
>> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> difficult to read in such a small place
>> - see attached file :)
>
> Hi,
>
> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
>
> Two things -
>
> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
>
> -robyn
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks:
>> >
>> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >
>> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
>> > also attractive.
>> >
>> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >
>> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >
>> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >
>> > A couple of constraints:
>> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> > will make life simpler)
>> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
>> > scale/etc)
>> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
>> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
>> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
>> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >
>> > Anyone interested?
>> >
>> > --David
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> EOF
>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I like,
2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
I think it must even.
1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is my version:
>> - SVG format as you requested
>> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer few
>> colors for such pictures
>> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to fit
>> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> - if no monkey, then cloud
>> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> difficult to read in such a small place
>> - see attached file :)
>
> Hi,
>
> I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
>
> Two things -
>
> 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
> 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
>
> -robyn
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks:
>> >
>> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
>> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >
>> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
>> > also attractive.
>> >
>> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >
>> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >
>> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >
>> > A couple of constraints:
>> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> > will make life simpler)
>> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
>> > scale/etc)
>> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
>> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
>> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
>> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >
>> > Anyone interested?
>> >
>> > --David
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> EOF
>>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my version:
> - SVG format as you requested
> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer few
> colors for such pictures
> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to fit
> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> monkey is übercool anyway)
> - if no monkey, then cloud
> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> difficult to read in such a small place
> - see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks:
> >
> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >
> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> > also attractive.
> >
> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >
> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >
> > A couple of constraints:
> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> > will make life simpler)
> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
> > scale/etc)
> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >
> > Anyone interested?
> >
> > --David
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Posted by Robyn Bergeron <rb...@redhat.com>.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <la...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is my version:
> - SVG format as you requested
> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer few
> colors for such pictures
> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to fit
> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
> monkey is übercool anyway)
> - if no monkey, then cloud
> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
> difficult to read in such a small place
> - see attached file :)
Hi,
I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.)
Two things -
1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :)
2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)?
-robyn
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks:
> >
> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I
> > have a great opportunity for you :)
> >
> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is
> > also attractive.
> >
> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
> >
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
> >
> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
> >
> > A couple of constraints:
> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
> > will make life simpler)
> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to
> > scale/etc)
> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that
> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around
> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that
> > sentence makes it out to be.)
> >
> > Anyone interested?
> >
> > --David
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>