UIMA Java SDK version vs UIMA AS

[Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>]

Hi,

I know that UIMA AS is hard wired to a specific UIMA version. So, I do 
have to wait for the next UIMA AS release if I want to use the new 
features/bug fixes of the UIMA 2.7.0 release in an asyncronous setting, 
right?

My actual question: Is it worth spending thoughts about using UIMA AS 
with the current UIMA Java SDK release? Can someone share his/her 
experiences?

Best,

Peter

Re: UIMA Java SDK version vs UIMA AS

[Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>]

Great, thank you.

Peter

Am 11.03.2015 um 17:33 schrieb Jaroslaw Cwiklik:
> Peter, although it is true that UIMA-AS (v.2.6.0) comes with a specific
> version of UIMA SDK (v.2.6.0) you can certainly override it by placing
> 2.7.0 SDK ahead in the classpath. The UIMA-AS uses the SDK to deploy AEs,
> and it also uses UIMA serializer/deserializer code. My understanding is
> that the recent changes made by Marshall should not effect UIMA-AS. I guess
> I defer this to him for confirmation. I did test UIMA-AS with SDK 2.7.0 RC7
> and did not see any problems.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that UIMA AS is hard wired to a specific UIMA version. So, I do
>> have to wait for the next UIMA AS release if I want to use the new
>> features/bug fixes of the UIMA 2.7.0 release in an asyncronous setting,
>> right?
>>
>> My actual question: Is it worth spending thoughts about using UIMA AS with
>> the current UIMA Java SDK release? Can someone share his/her experiences?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>

Re: UIMA Java SDK version vs UIMA AS

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

On 3/11/2015 12:33 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> Peter, although it is true that UIMA-AS (v.2.6.0) comes with a specific
> version of UIMA SDK (v.2.6.0) you can certainly override it by placing
> 2.7.0 SDK ahead in the classpath. The UIMA-AS uses the SDK to deploy AEs,
> and it also uses UIMA serializer/deserializer code. My understanding is
> that the recent changes made by Marshall should not effect UIMA-AS. I guess
> I defer this to him for confirmation. I did test UIMA-AS with SDK 2.7.0 RC7
> and did not see any problems.

Yes, I think that's correct.

The build info for uima-as does specify a specific level of uimaj-core to use,
however, and it's set to 2.6.0.

This could be relaxed, going forward, to a "range" kind of version specification.

-Marshall
>
> Jerry
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that UIMA AS is hard wired to a specific UIMA version. So, I do
>> have to wait for the next UIMA AS release if I want to use the new
>> features/bug fixes of the UIMA 2.7.0 release in an asyncronous setting,
>> right?
>>
>> My actual question: Is it worth spending thoughts about using UIMA AS with
>> the current UIMA Java SDK release? Can someone share his/her experiences?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>

Re: UIMA Java SDK version vs UIMA AS

[Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>]

Peter, although it is true that UIMA-AS (v.2.6.0) comes with a specific
version of UIMA SDK (v.2.6.0) you can certainly override it by placing
2.7.0 SDK ahead in the classpath. The UIMA-AS uses the SDK to deploy AEs,
and it also uses UIMA serializer/deserializer code. My understanding is
that the recent changes made by Marshall should not effect UIMA-AS. I guess
I defer this to him for confirmation. I did test UIMA-AS with SDK 2.7.0 RC7
and did not see any problems.

Jerry


On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know that UIMA AS is hard wired to a specific UIMA version. So, I do
> have to wait for the next UIMA AS release if I want to use the new
> features/bug fixes of the UIMA 2.7.0 release in an asyncronous setting,
> right?
>
> My actual question: Is it worth spending thoughts about using UIMA AS with
> the current UIMA Java SDK release? Can someone share his/her experiences?
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>