You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Eike Rathke <oo...@erack.de> on 2011/08/02 00:25:36 UTC
Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org?
Hi Rob,
On Monday, 2011-08-01 17:46:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> Another key question is that of accounts. Who will have write access
> to the wiki?
>
> 1) We preserve the accounts of the Oracle-hosted server and anyone who
> has an account there has one at Apache?
+1
The OOo wiki is the central resource for developers, extension
developers, translators, QA, documentation authors, marketing and end
users (if I forgot any, please forgive me), accounts should be
preserved.
> I think this boils down to: is this a project wiki with project work
> in it? Or is it a community wiki?
It is a community wiki.
> What do we need to ensure that the
> PPMC has oversight of project outputs and that our users have the
> rights they think they have to those outputs, which is to say, that
> new content remains under Apache 2.0?
If simply the hosting of the wiki is transfered, why would content have
to be under AL2?
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org?
Posted by Rob Weir <ap...@robweir.com>.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Eike Rathke <oo...@erack.de> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Monday, 2011-08-01 17:46:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> Another key question is that of accounts. Who will have write access
>> to the wiki?
>>
>> 1) We preserve the accounts of the Oracle-hosted server and anyone who
>> has an account there has one at Apache?
>
> +1
>
> The OOo wiki is the central resource for developers, extension
> developers, translators, QA, documentation authors, marketing and end
> users (if I forgot any, please forgive me), accounts should be
> preserved.
>
>> I think this boils down to: is this a project wiki with project work
>> in it? Or is it a community wiki?
>
> It is a community wiki.
>
>> What do we need to ensure that the
>> PPMC has oversight of project outputs and that our users have the
>> rights they think they have to those outputs, which is to say, that
>> new content remains under Apache 2.0?
>
> If simply the hosting of the wiki is transfered, why would content have
> to be under AL2?
>
I mean new content added to the wiki.
> Eike
>
> --
> PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
> Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
>