Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-1.4 (CANCELLED)

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:23 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> Aside from the tagBase thingy I think this looks okay... I'd really  
> like to see the tagBase removed though...

I agree, I'll try again without tagBase tomorrow.... can find out how  
well release:rollback works :-)
>
> Also, I think we can use this experience (using this profile) to  
> help us understand how to make genesis more useful to projects.   
> I've been thinking about completely re-implementing it for a while  
> now, as its a few years old and a bit clunky for our usage now.

Sure, but unless you can do this rewrite tomorrow I'd like to get  
something out that we can use for releasing the roller and directory  
plugins now.

thanks
david jencks


>
> --jason
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 6:10 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The main change in this version of genesis is a change in the  
>> release plugin configuration that enables overriding the tagBase  
>> in release profiles in projects that inherit from the project- 
>> config pom.  There are also some plugin version upgrades.
>>
>> The new root pom includes a release profile that sets up the  
>> standard javadoc, source and gpg plugins and only requires  
>> overriding the tagBase location.
>>
>> This sets us up for using the release process also now under vote  
>> described at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/ 
>> Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>>
>> The only Jira I know about is https://issues.apache.org/jira/ 
>> browse/GERONIMO-3895
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/org/apache/geronimo/ 
>> genesis
>>
>> Staging site: none
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>

Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-1.4 (CANCELLED)

[Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>]

On Mar 6, 2008, at 3:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:23 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Aside from the tagBase thingy I think this looks okay... I'd really  
>> like to see the tagBase removed though...
>
> I agree, I'll try again without tagBase tomorrow.... can find out  
> how well release:rollback works :-)
>>
>> Also, I think we can use this experience (using this profile) to  
>> help us understand how to make genesis more useful to projects.   
>> I've been thinking about completely re-implementing it for a while  
>> now, as its a few years old and a bit clunky for our usage now.
>
> Sure, but unless you can do this rewrite tomorrow I'd like to get  
> something out that we can use for releasing the roller and directory  
> plugins now.

Um, not gonna even try to do that for tomorrow.  I want to use this  
new release to see how well the new tooling works, then will consider  
a rewrite.

--jason


> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2008, at 6:10 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The main change in this version of genesis is a change in the  
>>> release plugin configuration that enables overriding the tagBase  
>>> in release profiles in projects that inherit from the project- 
>>> config pom.  There are also some plugin version upgrades.
>>>
>>> The new root pom includes a release profile that sets up the  
>>> standard javadoc, source and gpg plugins and only requires  
>>> overriding the tagBase location.
>>>
>>> This sets us up for using the release process also now under vote  
>>> described at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Proposed+%28updated%29+release+process
>>>
>>> The only Jira I know about is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3895
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/org/apache/geronimo/genesis
>>>
>>> Staging site: none
>>>
>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-1.4 (CANCELLED)

[Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>]

On Mar 6, 2008, at 3:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:

>
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:23 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Aside from the tagBase thingy I think this looks okay... I'd really  
>> like to see the tagBase removed though...
>
> I agree, I'll try again without tagBase tomorrow.... can find out  
> how well release:rollback works :-)

Heh. Yay a good test case... ;-)

--kevan