You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by "Daniel Dai (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/24 19:28:45 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (PIG-767) Schema reported from DESCRIBE and actual
schema of inner bags are different.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Daniel Dai resolved PIG-767.
----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
Review notes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/278/
> Schema reported from DESCRIBE and actual schema of inner bags are different.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-767
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: George Mavromatis
> Assignee: Daniel Dai
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
> Attachments: PIG-767-1.patch, PIG-767-2.patch, PIG-767-3.patch, PIG-767-4.patch
>
>
> The following script:
> urlContents = LOAD 'inputdir' USING BinStorage() AS (url:bytearray, pg:bytearray);
> -- describe and dump are in-sync
> DESCRIBE urlContents;
> DUMP urlContents;
> urlContentsG = GROUP urlContents BY url;
> DESCRIBE urlContentsG;
> urlContentsF = FOREACH urlContentsG GENERATE group,urlContents.pg;
> DESCRIBE urlContentsF;
> DUMP urlContentsF;
> Prints for the DESCRIBE commands:
> urlContents: {url: chararray,pg: chararray}
> urlContentsG: {group: chararray,urlContents: {url: chararray,pg: chararray}}
> urlContentsF: {group: chararray,pg: {pg: chararray}}
> The reported schemas for urlContentsG and urlContentsF are wrong. They are also against the section "Schemas for Complex Data Types" in http://wiki.apache.org/pig-data/attachments/FrontPage/attachments/plrm.htm#_Schemas.
> As expected, actual data observed from DUMP urlContentsG and DUMP urlContentsF do contain the tuple inside the inner bags.
> The correct schema for urlContentsG is: {group: chararray,urlContents: {t1:(url: chararray,pg: chararray)}}
> This may sound like a technicality, but it isn't. For instance, a UDF that assumes an inner bag of {chararray} will not work with {(chararray)}.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.