You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@qpid.apache.org by Fraser Adams <fr...@blueyonder.co.uk> on 2014/08/21 10:57:53 UTC
0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Hi Justin,
As per discussion on the thread Re: 0.30 release update - beta is available
I'd like to request inclusion of:
QPID-6024 (Update of QMF plugin to track change to Java Broker Model) and
QPID-6025 (Fixes for the Java QpidConfig issues that Robbie reported the
other day)
If you are happy for these to be included could I confirm that the
branch to merge them to is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.30/
Many thanks,
Frase
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 21 August 2014 10:26, Fraser Adams <fr...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 21/08/14 10:07, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>> On 08/21/2014 09:57 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Justin,
>>> As per discussion on the thread Re: 0.30 release update - beta is
>>> available
>>>
>>> I'd like to request inclusion of:
>>> QPID-6024 (Update of QMF plugin to track change to Java Broker Model) and
>>>
>>
>> Is this needed on 0.30? I built the plugin ok from the beat tarball. What
>> was the revision of the change that this fix corresponds to? Did that make
>> it to the 0.30 branch? (If so, my test procedure was probably faulty).
>>
>
> Ahh that's a good point Gordon, I did this fix in response to a change
> that Rob made to the Java Broker Model. Inclusion of it needs to be tied to
> Rob's changes - as Robbie said the other day I probably should have
> referenced Rob's Jira rather than creating a separate one, but my brain is
> currently mush.
>
> Rob were you planning on requesting your recent model changes for 0.30?
> if so could you include the change I made for QPID-6024?
> (agentdata/Broker.java).
>
>
As Gordon mentioned in his next mail, the change has already been requested
(QPID-6010 / http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1618858),
just not yet approved or merged. I'll update the relevant JIRA to relate
them and point out the association.
>
>
>
>> QPID-6025 (Fixes for the Java QpidConfig issues that Robbie reported the
>>> other day)
>>>
>>>
>> This one is still reasonable I believe.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
Re: 0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Posted by Fraser Adams <fr...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 21/08/14 10:07, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 09:57 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>> As per discussion on the thread Re: 0.30 release update - beta is
>> available
>>
>> I'd like to request inclusion of:
>> QPID-6024 (Update of QMF plugin to track change to Java Broker Model)
>> and
>
> Is this needed on 0.30? I built the plugin ok from the beat tarball.
> What was the revision of the change that this fix corresponds to? Did
> that make it to the 0.30 branch? (If so, my test procedure was
> probably faulty).
Ahh that's a good point Gordon, I did this fix in response to a change
that Rob made to the Java Broker Model. Inclusion of it needs to be tied
to Rob's changes - as Robbie said the other day I probably should have
referenced Rob's Jira rather than creating a separate one, but my brain
is currently mush.
Rob were you planning on requesting your recent model changes for 0.30?
if so could you include the change I made for QPID-6024?
(agentdata/Broker.java).
>
>> QPID-6025 (Fixes for the Java QpidConfig issues that Robbie reported the
>> other day)
>>
>
This one is still reasonable I believe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Posted by Justin Ross <jr...@apache.org>.
Okay, sorry about the delay. QPID-6025 is approved. You have the correct
branch.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Fraser Adams <fraser.adams@blueyonder.co.uk
> wrote:
> Hi again Justin,
> You've not got back to me about QPID-6025
>
> Robbie has reviewed it.
>
> Regards,
> Frase
>
>
>
>> QPID-6025 (Fixes for the Java QpidConfig issues that Robbie reported the
>>> other day)
>>>
>>> If you are happy for these to be included could I confirm that the
>>> branch to merge them to is:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.30/
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
Re: 0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Posted by Fraser Adams <fr...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
Hi again Justin,
You've not got back to me about QPID-6025
Robbie has reviewed it.
Regards,
Frase
>
>> QPID-6025 (Fixes for the Java QpidConfig issues that Robbie reported the
>> other day)
>>
>> If you are happy for these to be included could I confirm that the
>> branch to merge them to is:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.30/
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 08/21/2014 10:07 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 09:57 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>> As per discussion on the thread Re: 0.30 release update - beta is
>> available
>>
>> I'd like to request inclusion of:
>> QPID-6024 (Update of QMF plugin to track change to Java Broker Model) and
>
> Is this needed on 0.30? I built the plugin ok from the beat tarball.
> What was the revision of the change that this fix corresponds to? Did
> that make it to the 0.30 branch? (If so, my test procedure was probably
> faulty).
Looks like it was
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1618858, whereas
0.30 branched at r1616583.
However, I see that Keith has requested QPID-6010 for 0.30. If that were
granted then this change would also be needed (otherwise it is not).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.30 RFI QPID-6024 and QPID-6025
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 08/21/2014 09:57 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> As per discussion on the thread Re: 0.30 release update - beta is available
>
> I'd like to request inclusion of:
> QPID-6024 (Update of QMF plugin to track change to Java Broker Model) and
Is this needed on 0.30? I built the plugin ok from the beat tarball.
What was the revision of the change that this fix corresponds to? Did
that make it to the 0.30 branch? (If so, my test procedure was probably
faulty).
> QPID-6025 (Fixes for the Java QpidConfig issues that Robbie reported the
> other day)
>
> If you are happy for these to be included could I confirm that the
> branch to merge them to is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.30/
>
> Many thanks,
> Frase
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org