You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2012/07/09 09:24:28 UTC
Second birthday concall and release schedule
Hi all,
I would like to make an update about three topics:
1/ Second birthday concall
Once again sorry for the delay for this concall.
I propose this second birthday concall on Monday, July, 16th, at 18:00 GMT.
I will create the wiki page for attendees and provide the connection
information.
2/ Karaf 2.3.0 release
I reviewed the Karaf 2.3.0 opened issues. I gonna work on these issues
today. However, we don't have dependencies to pending SNAPSHOTs or so,
so I think we can release a first 2.3.0 version. I propose to cut off
the release on Wednesday.
WDYT ?
@Jamie: is it OK for you ? I can take this release if you prefer.
3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
- we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
currently)
- the source distribution is missing
I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the
Aries modules update.
I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
release (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off
the release end of this week.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Always happy to do a release :)
Marking my calendar for the community call :)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to make an update about three topics:
>
> 1/ Second birthday concall
> Once again sorry for the delay for this concall.
> I propose this second birthday concall on Monday, July, 16th, at 18:00 GMT.
> I will create the wiki page for attendees and provide the connection
> information.
>
> 2/ Karaf 2.3.0 release
> I reviewed the Karaf 2.3.0 opened issues. I gonna work on these issues
> today. However, we don't have dependencies to pending SNAPSHOTs or so, so I
> think we can release a first 2.3.0 version. I propose to cut off the release
> on Wednesday.
> WDYT ?
> @Jamie: is it OK for you ? I can take this release if you prefer.
>
> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
> currently)
> - the source distribution is missing
> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the Aries
> modules update.
> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC release
> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the release
> end of this week.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi all,
I updated the wiki to schedule the second birthday call on Tuesday 31st
of July.
Regards
JB
On 07/15/2012 07:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to
> perform deeper investigation.
> The doctor request me to rest one week.
>
> So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide:
> - you can maintain the call without me
> - we postpone one week more
>
> Sorry again for that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> FYI,
>>
>> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
>>
>>
>>
>> I will make a test with Google Hangout.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> The Aries API modules have been module.
>>>
>>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
>>> will be released.
>>>
>>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>>>> Hurray :-)
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>>>> everything
>>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are
>>>>> ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature
>>>>>> point
>>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it;
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a
>>>>>>>>> first RC
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and
>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> aries
>>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>>>> beside
>>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Yes, let's wait for JB's healthy return before we hold the call.
Hope you feel better soon JB!
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hey JB,
>
> first of all get better soon. And of course this call can wait till you're back
> and Healthy again.
>
> Regards, Achim
>
> 2012/7/16 Brian Topping <to...@codehaus.org>:
>> Hope you are feeling better soon, JB!!
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to perform deeper investigation.
>>> The doctor request me to rest one week.
>>>
>>> So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide:
>>> - you can maintain the call without me
>>> - we postpone one week more
>>>
>>> Sorry again for that.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> FYI,
>>>>
>>>> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will make a test with Google Hangout.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>> The Aries API modules have been module.
>>>>>
>>>>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
>>>>> will be released.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>>>>>> Hurray :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>>>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a
>>>>>>>>>>> first RC
>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and
>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>>>>>>> aries
>>>>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>>>>>> beside
>>>>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
> Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hey JB,
first of all get better soon. And of course this call can wait till you're back
and Healthy again.
Regards, Achim
2012/7/16 Brian Topping <to...@codehaus.org>:
> Hope you are feeling better soon, JB!!
>
> Brian
>
> On Jul 15, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to perform deeper investigation.
>> The doctor request me to rest one week.
>>
>> So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide:
>> - you can maintain the call without me
>> - we postpone one week more
>>
>> Sorry again for that.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> FYI,
>>>
>>> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
>>>
>>>
>>> I will make a test with Google Hangout.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>> The Aries API modules have been module.
>>>>
>>>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
>>>> will be released.
>>>>
>>>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>>>>> Hurray :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>>>>> everything
>>>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a
>>>>>>>>>> first RC
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and
>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>>>>>> aries
>>>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>>>>> beside
>>>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Brian Topping <to...@codehaus.org>.
Hope you are feeling better soon, JB!!
Brian
On Jul 15, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to perform deeper investigation.
> The doctor request me to rest one week.
>
> So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide:
> - you can maintain the call without me
> - we postpone one week more
>
> Sorry again for that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> FYI,
>>
>> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
>>
>>
>> I will make a test with Google Hangout.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> The Aries API modules have been module.
>>>
>>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
>>> will be released.
>>>
>>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>>>> Hurray :-)
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>>>> everything
>>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a
>>>>>>>>> first RC
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and
>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>>>>> aries
>>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>>>> beside
>>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Hey JB,
a) I really hope you soon get done with this and that you get better soon,
b) I would prefer to delay the call for another week, somehow feels
wrong doing this without our chair :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to perform
> deeper investigation.
> The doctor request me to rest one week.
>
> So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide:
> - you can maintain the call without me
> - we postpone one week more
>
> Sorry again for that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> FYI,
>>
>> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
>>
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
>>
>>
>> I will make a test with Google Hangout.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> The Aries API modules have been module.
>>>
>>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
>>> will be released.
>>>
>>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>>>> Hurray :-)
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>>>> everything
>>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>>>>> you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a
>>>>>>>>> first RC
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and
>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>>>>> aries
>>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>>>> beside
>>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys,
I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to
perform deeper investigation.
The doctor request me to rest one week.
So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide:
- you can maintain the call without me
- we postpone one week more
Sorry again for that.
Regards
JB
On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> FYI,
>
> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
>
>
> I will make a test with Google Hangout.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> The Aries API modules have been module.
>>
>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
>> will be released.
>>
>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>>> Hurray :-)
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>>> everything
>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>>
>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>>>> you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a
>>>>>>>> first RC
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and
>>>>>> only
>>>>>> may
>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>>>> aries
>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>>> beside
>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
FYI,
I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29
I will make a test with Google Hangout.
Regards
JB
On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> The Aries API modules have been module.
>
> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
> will be released.
>
> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote!
>> Hurray :-)
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
>>> everything
>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>
>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>>> you think?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC
>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira
>>>>>>> about the
>>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only
>>>>> may
>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>>> aries
>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>>> beside
>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into
>>>>> Karaf 3
>>>>> to
>>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Schneider
>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>
>>> Open Source Architect
>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
The Aries API modules have been module.
I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules
will be released.
In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;)
Regards
JB
On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote! Hurray :-)
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly everything
>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>
>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>>> you think?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>>> currently)
>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the
>>>>>> Aries
>>>>>> modules update.
>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only
>>>> may
>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>>> aries
>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>>> beside
>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>>
>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into Karaf 3
>>>> to
>>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Schneider
>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Architect
>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Schneider
>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>
>> Open Source Architect
>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote! Hurray :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly everything
> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready.
>
> Christian
>
> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>
>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
>> you think?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>>> currently)
>>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the
>>>>> Aries
>>>>> modules update.
>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
>>>>> release
>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the
>>>>> release
>>>>> end of this week.
>>>>
>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only
>>> may
>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
>>> aries
>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
>>> beside
>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>>
>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into Karaf 3
>>> to
>>> be ready for a RC1.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Schneider
>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>
>>> Open Source Architect
>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>>
>
>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly
everything else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we
are ready.
Christian
Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
> you think?
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>> currently)
>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the
>>>> Aries
>>>> modules update.
>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
>>>> release
>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the release
>>>> end of this week.
>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only may
>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the aries
>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep beside
>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>
>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into Karaf 3 to
>> be ready for a RC1.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Schneider
>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>
>> Open Source Architect
>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Andreas,
in terms of features, we are very close (I have two that I'm working on:
around sub-shell completion and prompt, and around instance:clone).
I'm also updating Aries dependencies to 1.0.0.
We have to release a Pax Url 1.4.3 (as we use SNAPSHOT currently), I
will review the Pax Url Jira and cut off this release.
Even if it's a RC, we can't use SNAPSHOT release in dependencies.
I'm working on it this afternoon (and over the week end).
Regards
JB
On 07/13/2012 01:02 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
> you think?
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>>> currently)
>>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the
>>>> Aries
>>>> modules update.
>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
>>>> release
>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the release
>>>> end of this week.
>>>
>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>>
>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only may
>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the aries
>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep beside
>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>>
>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into Karaf 3 to
>> be ready for a RC1.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Schneider
>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>
>> Open Source Architect
>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now;
the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point
of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think
that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out
slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't
you think?
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>
>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>>> currently)
>>> - the source distribution is missing
>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the
>>> Aries
>>> modules update.
>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC
>>> release
>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the release
>>> end of this week.
>>
>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>
> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only may
> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the aries
> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep beside
> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
>
> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into Karaf 3 to
> be ready for a RC1.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
>> currently)
>> - the source distribution is missing
>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the Aries
>> modules update.
>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC release
>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the release
>> end of this week.
> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and only
may need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1.
What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the
aries release in that could be a nice point in time to do so.
I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep
beside Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time.
Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into Karaf
3 to be ready for a RC1.
What do you think?
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: Second birthday concall and release schedule
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Hey,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> 1/ Second birthday concall
> Once again sorry for the delay for this concall.
> I propose this second birthday concall on Monday, July, 16th, at 18:00 GMT.
> I will create the wiki page for attendees and provide the connection
> information.
+1
> 2/ Karaf 2.3.0 release
> I reviewed the Karaf 2.3.0 opened issues. I gonna work on these issues
> today. However, we don't have dependencies to pending SNAPSHOTs or so, so I
> think we can release a first 2.3.0 version. I propose to cut off the release
> on Wednesday.
> WDYT ?
> @Jamie: is it OK for you ? I can take this release if you prefer.
+1 from my side
> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1
> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC release:
> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have
> currently)
> - the source distribution is missing
> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira about the Aries
> modules update.
> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a first RC release
> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the release
> end of this week.
+1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first release
candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we?
Kind regards,
Andreas
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>