You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/09/21 12:38:55 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] lhotari commented on issue #14092: Provide a smaller Pulsar docker image without unnecessary development packages

lhotari commented on issue #14092:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14092#issuecomment-1253650641

   > @lhotari would you mind pointing to a subdirectory of https://hub.docker.com/u/apachepulsar where one can obtain the smaller image and cross-check the MBs saved in size (before and after this change - should be arround v2.10)? 
   
   I think the simplest way to get a comparison of #14093 changes would be to build a docker images before and after locally. 
   
   > Do the savings meet your expectations?
   
   yes, for the particular changes. However, I think that Pulsar lacks a proper slim image, but that's a topic for a separate discussion.
   
   > 
   > Do we have to make any changes in text or link targets in doc on https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/next/deploy-docker ?
   
   That document looks very much outdated. It doesn't make sense to me.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org