You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by James Yong <ja...@apache.org> on 2020/01/29 15:52:59 UTC
Re: Removing ���base/config/component-load.xml���
Added my comments on the technical aspects of the proposal at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11296
On 2020/01/29 08:26:00, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi Mathieu, Samuel,
>
> You were the most visible proponents of this. After 5 days w/o exchanges should we consider the idea is abandoned or should we start a vote?
>
> Without answers I'll consider the idea abandoned, which is a pity IMO.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 24/01/2020 à 14:12, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> > Hi Jacques,
> >
> > yes, my objection is targeted to the removal of the component-load.xml mechanism for applications and plugins.
> >
> > I don't think it will be a problem to remove it from framework/base/config/ and hard code the four existing components framework, themes,
> > applications and plugins.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael Brohl
> >
> > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
> >
> >
> > Am 24.01.20 um 08:03 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> >> Le 24/01/2020 à 07:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Since it's impossible to have both features (ie “base/config/component-load.xml” and <depends-on> present) and we don't reach a consensus I'll
> >>> start a vote about it.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>
> >> Before I start a vote, here is a last try to get a consensus. Michael in his last email, answering to Pierre, made clear that he would not oppose
> >> to <<Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”>>. His concern is more for application and plugins component-load.xml.
> >>
> >> Could we not reach a consensus with this option? Mathieu, Samuel?
> >>
> >> Then we could discuss more about details for application and plugins component-load.xml...
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >
>
Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Thanks James,
Maybe better to continue there indeed, less confusion, just focused on what's important.
Jacques
Le 29/01/2020 à 16:52, James Yong a écrit :
> Added my comments on the technical aspects of the proposal at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11296
>
> On 2020/01/29 08:26:00, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mathieu, Samuel,
>>
>> You were the most visible proponents of this. After 5 days w/o exchanges should we consider the idea is abandoned or should we start a vote?
>>
>> Without answers I'll consider the idea abandoned, which is a pity IMO.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 24/01/2020 à 14:12, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>> Hi Jacques,
>>>
>>> yes, my objection is targeted to the removal of the component-load.xml mechanism for applications and plugins.
>>>
>>> I don't think it will be a problem to remove it from framework/base/config/ and hard code the four existing components framework, themes,
>>> applications and plugins.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Michael Brohl
>>>
>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 24.01.20 um 08:03 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>> Le 24/01/2020 à 07:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Since it's impossible to have both features (ie “base/config/component-load.xml” and <depends-on> present) and we don't reach a consensus I'll
>>>>> start a vote about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>> Before I start a vote, here is a last try to get a consensus. Michael in his last email, answering to Pierre, made clear that he would not oppose
>>>> to <<Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”>>. His concern is more for application and plugins component-load.xml.
>>>>
>>>> Could we not reach a consensus with this option? Mathieu, Samuel?
>>>>
>>>> Then we could discuss more about details for application and plugins component-load.xml...
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>