You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by "Xuefu Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/10 15:44:34 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HIVE-8793) Make sure multi-insert works
with map join [Spark Branch]
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14204808#comment-14204808 ]
Xuefu Zhang edited comment on HIVE-8793 at 11/10/14 2:44 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
It's fine to make it a physical optimizer. For clone to work map, it seems we can make it as a field of SparkWork.
However, this might be complicated in some cases. Let's do some research and disable MJ optimization if it turns out to be too complicated.
was (Author: xuefuz):
It's fine to make it a physical optimizer. For clone to work map, it seems we can make it as a field of SparkWork.
> Make sure multi-insert works with map join [Spark Branch]
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-8793
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8793
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Spark
> Affects Versions: spark-branch
> Reporter: Chao
>
> Currently, HIVE-8622 is implemented based on an assumption, that for a map join query, a BaseWork would not have multiple children. By testing through subquery_multiinsert.q did reveal that's the case. But, we need to investigate on this, and make sure this won't happen in general.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)