You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org by 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com> on 2014/04/16 07:23:06 UTC
答复: 二级存储丢失
二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
谢谢大家了。
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 linuxbqj@gmail.com
发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
> HI ALL
>
> 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
>
> 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
>
> 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
> find storage pool to fit the vm
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
> Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
> cluster:1
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
> check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after
> prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128 and
> CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
> 500
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
> RAM: 268435456
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> available
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host: 68,
> used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
> 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host: 68,
> used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
> 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
> list: 68
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1 suitable
> hosts
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
> (67635,ROOT)
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> storage pool shared? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> storage pool shared? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> storage pool shared? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> storage pool shared? true
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
> find storage pool to fit the vm
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
> Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for this
> VM under any clusters, returning.
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
> before state transition: null
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
>
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
>
> at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
>
> at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
>
> at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
>
> at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
>
> at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>
> at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>
> at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
> storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
> storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
> 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
>
> 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
>
> ^C
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 许叁征
>
> 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
>
> [image: line1]
>
> Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
>
> E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
> http://www.chinanetcenter.com
>
> [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
>
> 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
>
> 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
>
> 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
--
白清杰 (Born Bai)
北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Posted by ganglin_lan <ga...@tcloudcomputing.com>.
生产环境不建议这样干，cs服务器只提供cs服务。你这样相当于主存储和cs在一台机器上
ganglin_lan
发件人： 许叁征
发送时间： 2014-04-17 17:20
收件人： users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; 'ganglin_lan'
主题： 答复: 答复: 二级存储丢失
目前 使用的环境 是CS主机具有虚拟机文件，全为home目录下，
那这个CS备用机器/home目录下是不是也要同步，这个同步是如何用的同步？。
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3501-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3501-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 ganglin_lan
发送时间: 2014年4月17日星期四 16:05
收件人: users-cn
主题: Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
cloudstack高可用可以配置cloudstack slave 服务器，正常安装cloudstack，初始化数据库时，不要用--deploy-as参数，这样两个cloudstack就可以同时管理了，当然前面还可以加个ngiinx之类的做负载均衡，重点是mysql数据库要做主从
ganglin_lan
发件人： 许叁征
发送时间： 2014-04-17 16:02
收件人： users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题： 答复: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Hi linuxbqj
故障修复过程，北京-steelen会发布一个恢复过程到社区里面哈，另外后面发现服务器硬盘坏了，现在又要开始迁移的过程恢复数据了。。
对了，想问大家一个问题，如何做高可用的cloudstack，就是说一台cloudstac k主机宕机机了，另一台备机cloudstac k仍能工作。
目前cloudstack能做到吗？如果有，可有推荐的解决方案链接。。求解。谢谢
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 linuxbqj@gmail.com
发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 15:11
收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
hey 叁征，是否可以把你的解决过程整理一个文章发布到社区网站呢
2014-04-16 14:12 GMT+08:00 Royal Yang <ra...@gmail.com>:
> 添加一个服务方案，勾选高可用，将虚拟机的服务方案更改为这个新建的方案。当host故障的时候应用此方案的虚拟机就能自动启动了
>
>
> 2014-04-16 13:23 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
>> 目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
>> 1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver
>> 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
>> 1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
>> 1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
>> 谢谢大家了。
>>
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org[mailto:
>> users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表
>> linuxbqj@gmail.com
>> 发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
>> 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
>> 主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
>>
>> 二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
>>
>> 二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>>
>> > HI ALL
>> >
>> > 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
>> >
>> > 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
>> >
>> > 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
>> > cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
>> > check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
>> after
>> > prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
>> > capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
>> > cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128
>> and
>> > CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
>> > 500
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
>> > RAM: 268435456
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>> > available
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
>> > 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>> > ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
>> > 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
>> > list: 68
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
>> suitable
>> > hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
>> > (67635,ROOT)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
>> this
>> > VM under any clusters, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
>> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
>> id
>> > before state transition: null
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
>> >
>> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
>> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
>> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>> >
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>> >
>> > at
>> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>> >
>> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Unable
>> > to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
>> > 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
>> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>> > 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
>> >
>> > ^C
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 许叁征
>> >
>> > 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
>> >
>> > [image: line1]
>> >
>> > Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
>> >
>> > E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
>> > http://www.chinanetcenter.com
>> >
>> > [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
>> >
>> > 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
>> >
>> > 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
>> >
>> > 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 白清杰 (Born Bai)
>>
>> 北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
>>
>> Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
--
白清杰 (Born Bai)
北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
答复: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Posted by 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>.
目前 使用的环境 是CS主机具有虚拟机文件，全为home目录下，
那这个CS备用机器/home目录下是不是也要同步，这个同步是如何用的同步？。
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3501-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3501-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 ganglin_lan
发送时间: 2014年4月17日星期四 16:05
收件人: users-cn
主题: Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
cloudstack高可用可以配置cloudstack slave 服务器，正常安装cloudstack，初始化数据库时，不要用--deploy-as参数，这样两个cloudstack就可以同时管理了，当然前面还可以加个ngiinx之类的做负载均衡，重点是mysql数据库要做主从
ganglin_lan
发件人： 许叁征
发送时间： 2014-04-17 16:02
收件人： users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题： 答复: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Hi linuxbqj
故障修复过程，北京-steelen会发布一个恢复过程到社区里面哈，另外后面发现服务器硬盘坏了，现在又要开始迁移的过程恢复数据了。。
对了，想问大家一个问题，如何做高可用的cloudstack，就是说一台cloudstac k主机宕机机了，另一台备机cloudstac k仍能工作。
目前cloudstack能做到吗？如果有，可有推荐的解决方案链接。。求解。谢谢
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 linuxbqj@gmail.com
发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 15:11
收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
hey 叁征，是否可以把你的解决过程整理一个文章发布到社区网站呢
2014-04-16 14:12 GMT+08:00 Royal Yang <ra...@gmail.com>:
> 添加一个服务方案，勾选高可用，将虚拟机的服务方案更改为这个新建的方案。当host故障的时候应用此方案的虚拟机就能自动启动了
>
>
> 2014-04-16 13:23 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
>> 目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
>> 1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver
>> 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
>> 1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
>> 1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
>> 谢谢大家了。
>>
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org[mailto:
>> users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表
>> linuxbqj@gmail.com
>> 发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
>> 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
>> 主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
>>
>> 二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
>>
>> 二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>>
>> > HI ALL
>> >
>> > 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
>> >
>> > 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
>> >
>> > 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
>> > cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
>> > check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
>> after
>> > prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
>> > capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
>> > cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128
>> and
>> > CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
>> > 500
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
>> > RAM: 268435456
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>> > available
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
>> > 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>> > ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
>> > 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
>> > list: 68
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
>> suitable
>> > hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
>> > (67635,ROOT)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
>> this
>> > VM under any clusters, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
>> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
>> id
>> > before state transition: null
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
>> >
>> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
>> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
>> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>> >
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>> >
>> > at
>> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>> >
>> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Unable
>> > to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
>> > 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
>> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>> > 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
>> >
>> > ^C
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 许叁征
>> >
>> > 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
>> >
>> > [image: line1]
>> >
>> > Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
>> >
>> > E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
>> > http://www.chinanetcenter.com
>> >
>> > [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
>> >
>> > 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
>> >
>> > 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
>> >
>> > 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 白清杰 (Born Bai)
>>
>> 北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
>>
>> Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
--
白清杰 (Born Bai)
北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Posted by ganglin_lan <ga...@tcloudcomputing.com>.
cloudstack高可用可以配置cloudstack slave 服务器，正常安装cloudstack，初始化数据库时，不要用--deploy-as参数，这样两个cloudstack就可以同时管理了，当然前面还可以加个ngiinx之类的做负载均衡，重点是mysql数据库要做主从
ganglin_lan
发件人： 许叁征
发送时间： 2014-04-17 16:02
收件人： users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题： 答复: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Hi linuxbqj
故障修复过程，北京-steelen会发布一个恢复过程到社区里面哈，另外后面发现服务器硬盘坏了，现在又要开始迁移的过程恢复数据了。。
对了，想问大家一个问题，如何做高可用的cloudstack，就是说一台cloudstac k主机宕机机了，另一台备机cloudstac k仍能工作。
目前cloudstack能做到吗？如果有，可有推荐的解决方案链接。。求解。谢谢
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 linuxbqj@gmail.com
发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 15:11
收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
hey 叁征，是否可以把你的解决过程整理一个文章发布到社区网站呢
2014-04-16 14:12 GMT+08:00 Royal Yang <ra...@gmail.com>:
> 添加一个服务方案，勾选高可用，将虚拟机的服务方案更改为这个新建的方案。当host故障的时候应用此方案的虚拟机就能自动启动了
>
>
> 2014-04-16 13:23 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
>> 目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
>> 1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver
>> 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
>> 1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
>> 1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
>> 谢谢大家了。
>>
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org[mailto:
>> users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表
>> linuxbqj@gmail.com
>> 发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
>> 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
>> 主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
>>
>> 二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
>>
>> 二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>>
>> > HI ALL
>> >
>> > 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
>> >
>> > 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
>> >
>> > 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
>> > cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
>> > check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
>> after
>> > prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
>> > capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
>> > cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128
>> and
>> > CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
>> > 500
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
>> > RAM: 268435456
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>> > available
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
>> > 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>> > ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
>> > 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
>> > list: 68
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
>> suitable
>> > hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
>> > (67635,ROOT)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
>> this
>> > VM under any clusters, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
>> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
>> id
>> > before state transition: null
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
>> >
>> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
>> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
>> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>> >
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>> >
>> > at
>> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>> >
>> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Unable
>> > to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
>> > 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
>> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>> > 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
>> >
>> > ^C
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 许叁征
>> >
>> > 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
>> >
>> > [image: line1]
>> >
>> > Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
>> >
>> > E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
>> > http://www.chinanetcenter.com
>> >
>> > [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
>> >
>> > 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
>> >
>> > 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
>> >
>> > 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 白清杰 (Born Bai)
>>
>> 北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
>>
>> Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
--
白清杰 (Born Bai)
北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
答复: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Posted by 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>.
Hi linuxbqj
故障修复过程，北京-steelen会发布一个恢复过程到社区里面哈，另外后面发现服务器硬盘坏了，现在又要开始迁移的过程恢复数据了。。
对了，想问大家一个问题，如何做高可用的cloudstack，就是说一台cloudstac k主机宕机机了，另一台备机cloudstac k仍能工作。
目前cloudstack能做到吗？如果有，可有推荐的解决方案链接。。求解。谢谢
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-3491-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 linuxbqj@gmail.com
发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 15:11
收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
hey 叁征，是否可以把你的解决过程整理一个文章发布到社区网站呢
2014-04-16 14:12 GMT+08:00 Royal Yang <ra...@gmail.com>:
> 添加一个服务方案，勾选高可用，将虚拟机的服务方案更改为这个新建的方案。当host故障的时候应用此方案的虚拟机就能自动启动了
>
>
> 2014-04-16 13:23 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
>> 目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
>> 1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver
>> 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
>> 1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
>> 1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
>> 谢谢大家了。
>>
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org[mailto:
>> users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表
>> linuxbqj@gmail.com
>> 发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
>> 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
>> 主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
>>
>> 二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
>>
>> 二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>>
>> > HI ALL
>> >
>> > 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
>> >
>> > 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
>> >
>> > 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
>> > cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
>> > check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
>> after
>> > prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
>> > capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
>> > cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128
>> and
>> > CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
>> > 500
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
>> > RAM: 268435456
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>> > available
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
>> > 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>> > ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
>> > 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
>> > list: 68
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
>> suitable
>> > hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
>> > (67635,ROOT)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
>> this
>> > VM under any clusters, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
>> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
>> id
>> > before state transition: null
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
>> >
>> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
>> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
>> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>> >
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>> >
>> > at
>> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>> >
>> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Unable
>> > to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
>> > 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
>> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>> > 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
>> >
>> > ^C
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 许叁征
>> >
>> > 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
>> >
>> > [image: line1]
>> >
>> > Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
>> >
>> > E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
>> > http://www.chinanetcenter.com
>> >
>> > [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
>> >
>> > 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
>> >
>> > 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
>> >
>> > 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 白清杰 (Born Bai)
>>
>> 北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
>>
>> Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
--
白清杰 (Born Bai)
北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Posted by "linuxbqj@gmail.com" <li...@gmail.com>.
hey 叁征，是否可以把你的解决过程整理一个文章发布到社区网站呢
2014-04-16 14:12 GMT+08:00 Royal Yang <ra...@gmail.com>:
> 添加一个服务方案，勾选高可用，将虚拟机的服务方案更改为这个新建的方案。当host故障的时候应用此方案的虚拟机就能自动启动了
>
>
> 2014-04-16 13:23 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
>> 目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
>> 1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver
>> 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
>> 1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
>> 1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
>> 谢谢大家了。
>>
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org[mailto:
>> users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表
>> linuxbqj@gmail.com
>> 发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
>> 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
>> 主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
>>
>> 二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
>>
>> 二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>>
>> > HI ALL
>> >
>> > 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
>> >
>> > 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
>> >
>> > 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
>> > cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
>> > check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
>> after
>> > prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
>> > capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
>> > cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128
>> and
>> > CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
>> > 500
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
>> > RAM: 268435456
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>> > available
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
>> > 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>> > ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>> 68,
>> > used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
>> > 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
>> > list: 68
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
>> suitable
>> > hosts
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
>> > (67635,ROOT)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
>> > storage pool shared? true
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
>> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
>> to
>> > find storage pool to fit the vm
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
>> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
>> this
>> > VM under any clusters, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
>> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
>> id
>> > before state transition: null
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
>> >
>> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
>> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
>> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
>> >
>> > at
>> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
>> >
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
>> >
>> > at
>> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
>> >
>> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>> >
>> > at
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Unable
>> > to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
>> > 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
>> > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
>> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
>> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> > (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>> > 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
>> >
>> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
>> > (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
>> >
>> > ^C
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 许叁征
>> >
>> > 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
>> >
>> > [image: line1]
>> >
>> > Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
>> >
>> > E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
>> > http://www.chinanetcenter.com
>> >
>> > [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
>> >
>> > 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
>> >
>> > 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
>> >
>> > 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 白清杰 (Born Bai)
>>
>> 北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
>>
>> Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
--
白清杰 (Born Bai)
北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
Re: 答复: 二级存储丢失
Posted by Royal Yang <ra...@gmail.com>.
添加一个服务方案，勾选高可用，将虚拟机的服务方案更改为这个新建的方案。当host故障的时候应用此方案的虚拟机就能自动启动了
2014-04-16 13:23 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
>
> 二级存储是使用NFS的，后面经“北京-steelen”的协助支持下，启用本地存储后经相应检查后，虚拟机多数可以启动了。在这里面要特别感谢下steelen，来到厦门的时候，记得告诉我，请你吃大餐以表心意，
> 目前有两个问题，在平时中一直困扰的。
> 1.使用两台XENserver为一个pool集群后，xenserver,有自时它会自动在XEN面板上变红色图标，然后节点会自动消失，一台xenserver
> 就会ping不通掉，看起来是机器在重启了。这样就造成虚拟机也瞬间停止运行了。。隔了2分钟后，它会可能会自动加载成同一个pool。
> 1.1想问下各位，造成这个问题的原因是什么，如何处理？
> 1.2 如何在节点故障恢复后，虚拟机也能自动启动起来免人工手动启动。
> 谢谢大家了。
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org[mailto:
> users-cn-return-3485-xusz=chinanetcenter.com@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表
> linuxbqj@gmail.com
> 发送时间: 2014年4月16日星期三 7:49
> 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: 二级存储丢失
>
> 二级存储是使用的iscsi还是NFS呢？
>
> 二级存储手动挂载有没有问题？看日志，分析是二级存储挂载不上
>
>
> 2014-04-15 10:18 GMT+08:00 许叁征 <xu...@chinanetcenter.com>:
>
> > HI ALL
> >
> > 最近一节点因为innode文件满了，造成虚拟机挺止，修复好节点却发现虚拟机无法启动，
> >
> > 环境：CS4.0.1 +XENSERVER。
> >
> > 添加了XEN主存储还是不能启动虚拟机。
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to
> > find storage pool to fit the vm
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 20
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,114 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 20
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,115 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1
> > cluster:1
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,117 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
> > check for allocation: [Host[-68-Routing]]
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation
> after
> > prioritization: [Host[-68-Routing]]
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,119 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,120 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 68 has enough
> > capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: 268435456 ,
> > cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 6.0
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 34128
> and
> > CPU after applying overprovisioning: 204768
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 204768 , Requested CPU:
> > 500
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 24472994112 , Requested
> > RAM: 268435456
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> > available
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
> 68,
> > used: 0, reserved: 0, actual total: 34128, total with overprovisioning:
> > 204768; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> > ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
> 68,
> > used: 0, reserved: 0, total: 24472994112; requested mem:
> > 268435456,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, adding to
> > list: 68
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,122 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1
> suitable
> > hosts
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,123 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
> > (67635,ROOT)
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) We need to allocate new storagepool for this volume
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,124 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Looking for pools in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 4 pools to check for allocation
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen131 ,poolId: 227
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > storage pool shared? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary2 ,poolId: 236
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > storage pool shared? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: primary ,poolId: 200
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > storage pool shared? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: xen129 ,poolId: 235
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > localStorageAllocationNeeded? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Is
> > storage pool shared? true
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null)
> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
> to
> > find storage pool to fit the vm
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found for volume:
> > Vol[67635|vm=67556|ROOT] under cluster: 1
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable pools found
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
> this
> > VM under any clusters, returning.
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,126 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No Pods found for destination, returning.
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,274 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
> id
> > before state transition: null
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,276 WARN
> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
> >
> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-67556-VM]Scope=interface
> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:472)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:465)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:257)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:684)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1310)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:119)
> >
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
> >
> > at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:106)
> >
> > at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34)
> >
> > at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83)
> >
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73)
> >
> > at
> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> >
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
> >
> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
> >
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
> >
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
> >
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> >
> > at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> >
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Unable
> > to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
> > 67556, will recycle it and start a new one
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:48,277 INFO
> > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:49,247 DEBUG
> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers.
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,920 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,923 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/share/secondary
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,925 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-3:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
> > storage host nfs://172.16.0.130/home/secondary
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:58,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Executing request
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> > (DirectAgent-55:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Response Received:
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> > (StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 68-1544683570: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
> > 690716573693, via: 68, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
> >
> > 2014-04-15 10:12:59,864 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> > (DirectAgent-133:null) Seq 68-1544683571: Executing request
> >
> > ^C
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 许叁征
> >
> > 网宿科技股份有限公司 厦门分公司 运营技术支持部
> >
> > [image: line1]
> >
> > Tel: <021-64871177>13860125907
> >
> > E-mail:xusz@chinanetcenter.com
> > http://www.chinanetcenter.com
> >
> > [image: cid:__1@Foxmail.net]
> >
> > 分公司：北京-上海-广州-深圳
> >
> > 免费咨询热线:800-820-0001
> >
> > 网宿科技 --卓越的互联网业务平台提供商
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 白清杰 (Born Bai)
>
> 北京开源愿景信息技术有限公司
>
> Mail: linuxbqj@gmail.com
>
>
>