You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@nuttx.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/05/13 09:04:49 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] eenurkka opened a new pull request, #6261: risc-v/mpfs: IHC: clarify semaphore usage

eenurkka opened a new pull request, #6261:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6261

   g_mpfs_ack_sig and g_mpfs_rx_sig are better used with
   SEM_INITIALIZER(0) (signalling) rather than with
   SEM_INITIALIZER(1) (mutual exclusion).
   
   Co-authored-by: Petro Karashchenko <pe...@gmail.com>
   Signed-off-by: Eero Nurkkala <ee...@offcode.fi>
   
   ## Summary
   
   The semaphores are rather used on signalling
   
   ## Impact
   
   None
   
   ## Testing
   
   Polarfire MPFS, still works
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] pkarashchenko merged pull request #6261: risc-v/mpfs: IHC: clarify semaphore usage

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.

pkarashchenko merged PR #6261:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6261


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org