10.9 versions in jira

[Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I noticed that the version of 10.9 on the 10.9 branch is currently
10.9.2.2, but there was no such version in JIRA.
So I added it.

However, I'm not sure this was the right thing to do, because there
are these versions now:

10.9.2.2 Head of 10.9 branch after abortive 10.9.2 rc2
10.9.2.1 Head of 10.9 branch after 10.9.2 rc1
10.9.2.0 10.9.2 rc1 Maintenance release

But I don't think we ever had an actual rc...

I think the plans for 10.10 are too close now to work on another 10.9,
I suggest we postpone that effort until later in the year, say April
sometime.

Opinions, thoughts anyone?

Myrna

Re: 10.9 versions in jira

[Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>]

On 2/27/13 3:22 PM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the version of 10.9 on the 10.9 branch is currently
> 10.9.2.2, but there was no such version in JIRA.
> So I added it.
>
> However, I'm not sure this was the right thing to do, because there
> are these versions now:
>
> 10.9.2.2 Head of 10.9 branch after abortive 10.9.2 rc2
> 10.9.2.1 Head of 10.9 branch after 10.9.2 rc1
> 10.9.2.0 10.9.2 rc1 Maintenance release
>
> But I don't think we ever had an actual rc...
>
> I think the plans for 10.10 are too close now to work on another 10.9,
> I suggest we postpone that effort until later in the year, say April
> sometime.
>
> Opinions, thoughts anyone?
>
> Myrna
>
Thanks for bringing this up, Myrna. The 10.10.1 release is more 
important to me than 10.9.2. If we end up trying to vet two releases at 
the same time, I'm afraid this means that I will concentrate on 10.10.1 
and not give 10.9.2 the attention it deserves. I recommend deferring 
10.9.2 until after we publish 10.10.1. In the meantime, I think that the 
10.9.2 series of release ids should be coalesced into a single release 
id and the 10.9 branch should be updated to have that id.

Thanks,
-Rick