[REPORT] Attic May Report

[Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>]

(A copy of our report to the board this month - drafted on the PMC
list and published here)

This month HiveMind moved to the Attic.  The one outstanding action
is removal of its unix group, but otherwise it is closed down with a task
for the future to evaluate deleting the hivemind-user@ mailing list.
Users have indicated the desire to fork HiveMind at the OPS4J open
development umbrella.  One question that came up during that
discussion was noting that the HiveMind software used the older
copyright header (in the header rather than the NOTICE), and our
decision not to fix that. A JIRA item was used to manage the end of
life process [ATTIC-1].

All of this will be documented this month to define a repeatable
process, and applied to Shale which voted to enter the Attic last
month [this will be on this month's board meeting agenda].

Re: [REPORT] Attic May Report

[Henri Yandell <hy...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Gavin <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hyandell@gmail.com [mailto:hyandell@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Henri
>> Yandell
>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 6:01 PM
>> To: general@attic.apache.org
>> Subject: [REPORT] Attic May Report
>>
>> (A copy of our report to the board this month - drafted on the PMC
>> list and published here)
>>
>> This month HiveMind moved to the Attic.  The one outstanding action
>> is removal of its unix group, but otherwise it is closed down with a task
>> for the future to evaluate deleting the hivemind-user@ mailing list.
>> Users have indicated the desire to fork HiveMind at the OPS4J open
>> development umbrella.  One question that came up during that
>> discussion was noting that the HiveMind software used the older
>> copyright header (in the header rather than the NOTICE), and our
>> decision not to fix that. A JIRA item was used to manage the end of
>> life process [ATTIC-1].
>>
>> All of this will be documented this month to define a repeatable
>> process, and applied to Shale which voted to enter the Attic last
>> month [this will be on this month's board meeting agenda].
>
> There is no mention here or on the attic lists that I can find regarding
> AxKit, see the XML Board report for more details, has this gotten lost
> somewhere communication wise?

I've replied to Gianugo's email.

Hen

RE: [REPORT] Attic May Report

[Gavin <ga...@16degrees.com.au>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hyandell@gmail.com [mailto:hyandell@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Henri
> Yandell
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 6:01 PM
> To: general@attic.apache.org
> Subject: [REPORT] Attic May Report
> 
> (A copy of our report to the board this month - drafted on the PMC
> list and published here)
> 
> This month HiveMind moved to the Attic.  The one outstanding action
> is removal of its unix group, but otherwise it is closed down with a task
> for the future to evaluate deleting the hivemind-user@ mailing list.
> Users have indicated the desire to fork HiveMind at the OPS4J open
> development umbrella.  One question that came up during that
> discussion was noting that the HiveMind software used the older
> copyright header (in the header rather than the NOTICE), and our
> decision not to fix that. A JIRA item was used to manage the end of
> life process [ATTIC-1].
> 
> All of this will be documented this month to define a repeatable
> process, and applied to Shale which voted to enter the Attic last
> month [this will be on this month's board meeting agenda].

There is no mention here or on the attic lists that I can find regarding
AxKit, see the XML Board report for more details, has this gotten lost
somewhere communication wise?

Gav...