You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xml.apache.org by Sc...@lotus.com on 2001/08/01 16:10:10 UTC
Re: Canonical XML
> So it could be interesting to use some package
> namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> like this.
I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
-scott
Christian Geuer-Pollmann
<geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni- To: Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>, general@xml.apache.org
siegen.de> cc: pmc@xml.apache.org, (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
Subject: Re: Canonical XML
07/31/2001 02:15 PM
Please respond to general
Hi Ted,
--On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>
wrote:
> [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
note
> in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best place
for
> this.
> I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> implementation.
> Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> create a new subproject
Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
"Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For instance,
my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but it
does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
like this.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
<ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
> Subject: Canonical XML
>
>> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> working
>> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is based
> on
>> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
the
>> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality and
> has
>> some small sample programs to see how it works.
>>
>> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
>> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
>>
>> Would be nice to hear from you,
>> Best regards, Christian
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
>> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
>>
>> PS: I asked general@xml.apache.org, but there was no response from the
>> list....
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Canonical XML
Posted by Ar...@chebucto.ns.ca.
+1. Yes, I am interested in this. I think it's important new stuff for XML
Apache.
Regards,
Arved Sandstrom
Quoting Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>:
> Ok,
>
> +1 for xml-security
>
> Where is everybody -- It can't be that no-one care about this can it?
>
> Ted
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Sc...@lotus.com>
> To: <ge...@xml.apache.org>
> Cc: <pm...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>
>
> >
> > > So it could be interesting to use some package
> > > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for
> things
> > > like this.
> >
> > I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
> >
> > -scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> > <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni- To: Ted
> Leung <tw...@sauria.com>, general@xml.apache.org
> > siegen.de> cc:
> pmc@xml.apache.org, (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> > Subject:
> Re: Canonical XML
> > 07/31/2001 02:15 PM
> > Please respond to general
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > --On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> > > code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> > > I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
> > note
> > > in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best
> place
> >
> > for
> > > this.
> > > I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> > > implementation.
> > > Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> > > create a new subproject
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
> > "Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
> > standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
> > that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For
> instance,
> >
> > my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but
> it
> > does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
> > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > like this.
> >
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
> > <ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
> > > Subject: Canonical XML
> > >
> > >> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> > > working
> > >> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is
> based
> > > on
> > >> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
> > the
> > >> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality
> and
> > > has
> > >> some small sample programs to see how it works.
> > >>
> > >> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
> > >> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
> > >>
> > >> Would be nice to hear from you,
> > >> Best regards, Christian
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
> > >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
> > >> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
> > >>
> > >> PS: I asked general@xml.apache.org, but there was no response from the
> > >> list....
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------
This mail was sent through the Nova Scotia Provincial Server,
with technical resources provided by Chebucto Community Net.
http://nsaccess.ns.ca/mail/ http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Canonical XML
Posted by Christian Geuer-Pollmann <ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>.
If it is possible that non-pmc menbers can vote:
+1 for xml-security
BTW: http://www.xmlsecurity.org/ has been updated. There now is an actual
CVS server hosted @ sf.net
> From: <Sc...@lotus.com>
> Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>>
>> I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Canonical XML
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@covalent.net>.
+0 from me. Yes - I'd love to give this a '+1' - but then I also would
feel responsible to make this happen. And that is something I personally
do not have the bandwidth for. But I am supportive :-) Go guys !
Dw
McNealy: Bacon and Egg breakfast: the chicken is supportive (+0); but the
pig is fully commited (+1). Very appropriate for the sort of
morning grub I get served here in london this week :-0>
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Ted Leung wrote:
> Ok,
>
> +1 for xml-security
>
> Where is everybody -- It can't be that no-one care about this can it?
>
> Ted
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Sc...@lotus.com>
> To: <ge...@xml.apache.org>
> Cc: <pm...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>
>
> >
> > > So it could be interesting to use some package
> > > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > > like this.
> >
> > I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
> >
> > -scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> > <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni- To: Ted
> Leung <tw...@sauria.com>, general@xml.apache.org
> > siegen.de> cc:
> pmc@xml.apache.org, (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> > Subject:
> Re: Canonical XML
> > 07/31/2001 02:15 PM
> > Please respond to general
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > --On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> > > code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> > > I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
> > note
> > > in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best
> place
> >
> > for
> > > this.
> > > I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> > > implementation.
> > > Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> > > create a new subproject
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
> > "Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
> > standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
> > that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For
> instance,
> >
> > my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but it
> > does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
> > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > like this.
> >
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
> > <ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
> > > Subject: Canonical XML
> > >
> > >> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> > > working
> > >> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is
> based
> > > on
> > >> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
> > the
> > >> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality and
> > > has
> > >> some small sample programs to see how it works.
> > >>
> > >> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
> > >> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
> > >>
> > >> Would be nice to hear from you,
> > >> Best regards, Christian
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
> > >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
> > >> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
> > >>
> > >> PS: I asked general@xml.apache.org, but there was no response from the
> > >> list....
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Canonical XML
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <di...@yahoo.com>.
+1 for xml-security.
Thanks,
dims
--- Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> +1 for xml-security
>
> Where is everybody -- It can't be that no-one care about this can it?
>
> Ted
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Sc...@lotus.com>
> To: <ge...@xml.apache.org>
> Cc: <pm...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>
>
> >
> > > So it could be interesting to use some package
> > > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > > like this.
> >
> > I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
> >
> > -scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> > <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni- To: Ted
> Leung <tw...@sauria.com>, general@xml.apache.org
> > siegen.de> cc:
> pmc@xml.apache.org, (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> > Subject:
> Re: Canonical XML
> > 07/31/2001 02:15 PM
> > Please respond to general
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > --On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> > > code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> > > I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
> > note
> > > in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best
> place
> >
> > for
> > > this.
> > > I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> > > implementation.
> > > Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> > > create a new subproject
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
> > "Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
> > standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
> > that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For
> instance,
> >
> > my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but it
> > does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
> > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > like this.
> >
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
> > <ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
> > > Subject: Canonical XML
> > >
> > >> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> > > working
> > >> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is
> based
> > > on
> > >> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
> > the
> > >> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality and
> > > has
> > >> some small sample programs to see how it works.
> > >>
> > >> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
> > >> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
> > >>
> > >> Would be nice to hear from you,
> > >> Best regards, Christian
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
> > >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
> > >> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
> > >>
> > >> PS: I asked general@xml.apache.org, but there was no response from the
> > >> list....
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
=====
Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Canonical XML
Posted by Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>.
Ok,
+1 for xml-security
Where is everybody -- It can't be that no-one care about this can it?
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: <Sc...@lotus.com>
To: <ge...@xml.apache.org>
Cc: <pm...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>
> > So it could be interesting to use some package
> > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > like this.
>
> I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
>
> -scott
>
>
>
>
>
> Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni- To: Ted
Leung <tw...@sauria.com>, general@xml.apache.org
> siegen.de> cc:
pmc@xml.apache.org, (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> Subject:
Re: Canonical XML
> 07/31/2001 02:15 PM
> Please respond to general
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> --On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>
> wrote:
>
> > [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> > code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> > I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
> note
> > in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best
place
>
> for
> > this.
> > I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> > implementation.
> > Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> > create a new subproject
>
> Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
> "Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
> standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
> that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For
instance,
>
> my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but it
> does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
> namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> like this.
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
> <ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
> > Subject: Canonical XML
> >
> >> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> > working
> >> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is
based
> > on
> >> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
> the
> >> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality and
> > has
> >> some small sample programs to see how it works.
> >>
> >> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
> >> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
> >>
> >> Would be nice to hear from you,
> >> Best regards, Christian
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
> >> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
> >>
> >> PS: I asked general@xml.apache.org, but there was no response from the
> >> list....
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Losing Internal Subset When Cloning
Posted by Sriram Rao <sr...@informix.com>.
Thanks Elena, but the I don't see set methods in the DocumentType
interface. Also, the 'value' property of a DocumentType node is null.
Is there a way to set the internal subset for a DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE?
Thanks Again,
Sriram
At 04:40 PM 8/16/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Sriram,
>
> > When deep cloning a DOCUMENT_NODE (of a DOM created using Xerces parser), I
> > loose the 'internal subset' property of its DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child. That
> > is, docType.getInternalSubset() (where docType is of type
> > DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE) returns null. This method however returns the correct
> > internal subset for the DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child of the DOCUMENT_NODE
> > (created by parsing XML document into a DOM) from which the clone was
> created.
> >
> > Any idea why this is happening? Any work-arounds?
>
>DOM L2 Core specifies for "cloneNode" that "cloning Document,
>DocumentType, Entity, and Notation nodes is implementation dependent".
>In our implementation we choose not to clone internalSubset.
>The easiest work-around is get it and set it yourself on the cloned
>node.
>
>Elena
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Losing Internal Subset When Cloning
Posted by Elena Litani <el...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sriram,
> When deep cloning a DOCUMENT_NODE (of a DOM created using Xerces parser), I
> loose the 'internal subset' property of its DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child. That
> is, docType.getInternalSubset() (where docType is of type
> DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE) returns null. This method however returns the correct
> internal subset for the DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child of the DOCUMENT_NODE
> (created by parsing XML document into a DOM) from which the clone was created.
>
> Any idea why this is happening? Any work-arounds?
DOM L2 Core specifies for "cloneNode" that "cloning Document,
DocumentType, Entity, and Notation nodes is implementation dependent".
In our implementation we choose not to clone internalSubset.
The easiest work-around is get it and set it yourself on the cloned
node.
Elena
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
Losing Internal Subset When Cloning
Posted by Sriram Rao <sr...@informix.com>.
Hi,
When deep cloning a DOCUMENT_NODE (of a DOM created using Xerces parser), I
loose the 'internal subset' property of its DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child. That
is, docType.getInternalSubset() (where docType is of type
DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE) returns null. This method however returns the correct
internal subset for the DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child of the DOCUMENT_NODE
(created by parsing XML document into a DOM) from which the clone was created.
Any idea why this is happening? Any work-arounds?
This may not be the correct alias to talk about the Crimson parser (anyone
aware of the correct alias?). However, when using the Crimson parser, deep
clone of the DOCUMENT_NODE completely looses its DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child.
Also, the internal subset is not set for the DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child of
the DOCUMENT_NODE originally created by parsing an XML document.
I would appreciate any help in resolving these issues with Xerces and
Crimson parsers.
Thanks,
Sriram
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
Losing Internal Subset When Cloning
Posted by Sriram Rao <sr...@informix.com>.
Hi,
When deep cloning a DOCUMENT_NODE (of a DOM created using Xerces parser), I
loose the 'internal subset' property of its DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child. That
is, docType.getInternalSubset() (where docType is of type
DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE) returns null. This method however returns the correct
internal subset for the DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child of the DOCUMENT_NODE
(created by parsing XML document into a DOM) from which the clone was created.
Any idea why this is happening? Any work-arounds?
This may not be the correct alias to talk about the Crimson parser (anyone
aware of the correct alias?). However, when using the Crimson parser, deep
clone of the DOCUMENT_NODE completely looses its DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child.
Also, the internal subset is not set for the DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE child of
the DOCUMENT_NODE originally created by parsing an XML document.
I would appreciate any help in resolving these issues with Xerces and
Crimson parsers.
Thanks,
Sriram
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-user-help@xml.apache.org
[xml-security] Re: Canonical XML
Posted by Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>.
Ok,
my apologies for not being quick and up to date on this.
So far I see 3 pmc +1's, one +0 and no -1';s. That seems like
enough to get this project going on. Unless someone in general
objects by Friday, we'll get started on creating an xml-security
project.
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: <Sc...@lotus.com>
To: <ge...@xml.apache.org>
Cc: <pm...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>
> > So it could be interesting to use some package
> > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > like this.
>
> I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
>
> -scott
>
>
>
>
>
> Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni- To: Ted
Leung <tw...@sauria.com>, general@xml.apache.org
> siegen.de> cc:
pmc@xml.apache.org, (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> Subject:
Re: Canonical XML
> 07/31/2001 02:15 PM
> Please respond to general
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> --On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <tw...@sauria.com>
> wrote:
>
> > [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> > code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> > I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
> note
> > in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best
place
>
> for
> > this.
> > I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> > implementation.
> > Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> > create a new subproject
>
> Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
> "Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
> standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
> that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For
instance,
>
> my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but it
> does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
> namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> like this.
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
> <ge...@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
> > Subject: Canonical XML
> >
> >> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> > working
> >> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is
based
> > on
> >> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
> the
> >> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality and
> > has
> >> some small sample programs to see how it works.
> >>
> >> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
> >> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
> >>
> >> Would be nice to hear from you,
> >> Best regards, Christian
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
> >> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
> >>
> >> PS: I asked general@xml.apache.org, but there was no response from the
> >> list....
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org