You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jason Harvey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/22 08:31:27 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CASSANDRA-3242) Nodes which are not in the ring
but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
Nodes which are not in the ring but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CASSANDRA-3242
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242
Project: Cassandra
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.8.5
Reporter: Jason Harvey
Priority: Trivial
All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does to execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CASSANDRA-3242) Nodes which are not in the ring
but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
Posted by "Brandon Williams (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brandon Williams resolved CASSANDRA-3242.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
I'm pretty sure CASSANDRA-3259 addressed the root cause of this.
> Nodes which are not in the ring but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.5
> Reporter: Jason Harvey
> Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Priority: Trivial
>
> All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does not execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
> Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3242) Nodes which are not in the ring
but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
Posted by "Jason Harvey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jason Harvey updated CASSANDRA-3242:
------------------------------------
Description:
All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does not execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
was:
All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does to execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
> Nodes which are not in the ring but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.5
> Reporter: Jason Harvey
> Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Priority: Trivial
>
> All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does not execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
> Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3242) Nodes which are not in the ring
but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
Posted by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112764#comment-13112764 ]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-3242:
-------------------------------------------
isn't "node in the ring but not owning anything" the same as a StorageProxy client? I'm fine w/ ignoring those.
> Nodes which are not in the ring but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.5
> Reporter: Jason Harvey
> Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Priority: Trivial
>
> All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does to execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
> Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3242) Nodes which are not in the ring
but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
Posted by "Brandon Williams (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112464#comment-13112464 ]
Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-3242:
---------------------------------------------
bq. Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
I'm not sure that's the best course of action since it's potentially dangerous. Maybe a 'truncate force' so the operator has to be aware of the danger first, but we should figure out why there is an unreachable node listed after CASSANDRA-3071 which should have solved that.
> Nodes which are not in the ring but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.5
> Reporter: Jason Harvey
> Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Priority: Trivial
>
> All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does to execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
> Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CASSANDRA-3242) Nodes which are not in the ring
but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
Posted by "Brandon Williams (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brandon Williams reassigned CASSANDRA-3242:
-------------------------------------------
Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Nodes which are not in the ring but are dead in gossip prevent truncation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3242
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.5
> Reporter: Jason Harvey
> Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Priority: Trivial
>
> All of the nodes in my ring are up, however I do have an 'unreachable' node in gossip which was removed some time ago. When I attempt to run a truncation, it does to execute since some nodes are dead, despite those nodes not owning anything in the ring.
> Could isAnyHostDown in StorageProxy.java be modified to not care about unreachable nodes that are not in the ring?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira