You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@oozie.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/08 06:25:10 UTC
[jira] [Created] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped
to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: OOZIE-78
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
Project: Oozie
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Hadoop QA
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be
bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13101750#comment-13101750 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-78:
--------------------------------
tucu00 remarked:
I don't know, never saw what is the roadmap/plan....
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped
to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Hadoop QA resolved OOZIE-78.
----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be
bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13099776#comment-13099776 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-78:
--------------------------------
rvs remarked:
Given that master is our road to 3.0.0 shouldn't it be 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Reopened] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped
to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Roman Shaposhnik (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Roman Shaposhnik reopened OOZIE-78:
-----------------------------------
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be
bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13101751#comment-13101751 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-78:
--------------------------------
rvs remarked:
Well, the roadmaps is easy to see now:
http://github.com/yahoo/oozie/issues/labels/oozie-3.0
But you didn't answer my question ;-)
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be
bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13101752#comment-13101752 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-78:
--------------------------------
tucu00 remarked:
I'm OK to bump up POMs to 3.x in master.
Still, not clear to me how we'll proceed with 2.x development.
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-78) GH-37: POMs in master should be
bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13101753#comment-13101753 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-78:
--------------------------------
rvs remarked:
Oozie 2.x is in a 100% maintenance mode as far as Y! team is concerned. The only changes going there would be the ones needed to provide relief for urgent production issues. Everything else should be going into master as part of our work on 3.0.
To you, the 2.2 branch should not be of any interest (unless Cloudera already has customers running 2.2 in production).
Of course, the reason I'm asking this question about master is whether we're ready to bite the bullet and sprint towards 3.0 or whether having an intermediate goal(s) of 2.X releases
would be more convenient.
That said, the only reason I could think of where 2.3 would make sense would be if we decide to take care of the technical debt first, before taking onto the 3.0 issues (which doesn't seem to be the case).
> GH-37: POMs in master should be bumped to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-78
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-78
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira