You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2015/04/08 18:24:01 UTC
[Bug 7169] New: SPF_PERMERROR documentation
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7169
Bug ID: 7169
Summary: SPF_PERMERROR documentation
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Rules (Eval Tests)
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: jquinn+SAbug@pccc.com
SPF_PERMERROR should include extra information sucn as "Redundant applicable
'v=spf1' sender policies found" in its description on the report:
Date [PID] dbg: spf: query for redacted: result: permerror, comment: , text:
Redundant applicable 'v=spf1' sender policies found
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7169] SPF_PERMERROR documentation
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7169
Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC| |davej@apache.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> ---
I don't this this is going to be practical to extend the rule hits/names to
cover every detailed problem with an SPF record to that causes a permerror.
All that really matters to SA is that there was a PERMERROR.
The envelope-from domain owner should have DMARC reporting setup and check the
feedback on their SPF record.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.