jetty component

[Erwan de FERRIERES <er...@nereide.biz>]

Hi all,

while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty 
server. As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?

Also, is there someone using it or not ?

Cheers,
-- 
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz

Re: jetty component

[Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>]

The idea is that some outside there may use it, so we keep it
We can't be sure that those persons are reading the dev ML, but they may still rely on Jetty

Jacques

From: "Erwan de FERRIERES" <er...@nereide.biz>
> Hi all,
> 
> while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty 
> server. As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?
> 
> Also, is there someone using it or not ?
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Erwan de FERRIERES
> www.nereide.biz
>

Re: jetty component

[Erwan de FERRIERES <er...@nereide.fr>]

Le 28/06/2010 17:35, Joe Eckard a écrit :
> Yes, I use it. I believe the only thing missing from the implementation in
> the official codebase is persistent session support, which could be added.
>
> Why remove it? If nothing else, it would nice to be able to run performance
> tests against the two if you suspect that one (or ofbiz's interaction with
> one) is underperforming.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES<
> erwan.de-ferrieres@nereide.biz>  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty server.
>> As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?
>>
>> Also, is there someone using it or not ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Erwan de FERRIERES
>> www.nereide.biz
>>
>
Yeah I was a bit harsh on this one... sorry for that. Anyway, as you 
said, performance tests would be useful, "just to know".
Also, are you still using the embedded jetty 6, or have you migrated to 
the 7 ? this would be a great addition :)

Cheers,

-- 
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz

Re: jetty component

[Joe Eckard <ec...@redrocketcorp.com>]

Yes, I use it. I believe the only thing missing from the implementation in
the official codebase is persistent session support, which could be added.

Why remove it? If nothing else, it would nice to be able to run performance
tests against the two if you suspect that one (or ofbiz's interaction with
one) is underperforming.


On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES <
erwan.de-ferrieres@nereide.biz> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty server.
> As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?
>
> Also, is there someone using it or not ?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Erwan de FERRIERES
> www.nereide.biz
>