You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Dave Newton <ne...@pingsite.com> on 2005/05/04 23:05:47 UTC

Re: [OT: Swing slow?] Re: ANOTHER IDE

Rick Reumann wrote:

> Eclipse was ok as far as IDE features and price tag, but it just 
> didn't 'feel' right to me. Using IDEA just feels right it, plus of 
> course it does everything and more you'd expect from an IDE. By the 
> way, who says Swing is slow? I don't think they use SWT for IDEA and 
> yet it sure is a responsive app. Eclipse actually seemed much more 
> sluggish to me on both windows and Linux.

A lot of Swing problems are due to Really Poor Swing coding--properly 
coded, Swing is fine.

My experience was similar; IDEA seemed quicker than Eclipse; no doubt 
one of those "get what you pay for" type things, although IDEA has been 
around longer, so I'm not terribly surprised, despite Eclipse's use of SWT.

It also seems like the new soon-to-be-released version of IDEA will 
allow even easier plugin development, probably (at least partially) a 
reaction to the Eclipse plugin model. Might have to switch myself, 
especially if I can convince (I have to fight for everything, despite 
metrics etc. that prove I'm right) the powers to invest in some freakin' 
developer tools... *sigh*

Dave



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org


RE: [OT: Swing slow?] Re: ANOTHER IDE

Posted by Folashade Adeyosoye <sh...@gmail.com>.
JBuilder 2005 has been good to me, a little slower that JBuilder 9, with JB
2005 thay have incorporated the eclipse feel



-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Newton [mailto:newton@pingsite.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:06 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [OT: Swing slow?] Re: ANOTHER IDE

Rick Reumann wrote:

> Eclipse was ok as far as IDE features and price tag, but it just 
> didn't 'feel' right to me. Using IDEA just feels right it, plus of 
> course it does everything and more you'd expect from an IDE. By the 
> way, who says Swing is slow? I don't think they use SWT for IDEA and 
> yet it sure is a responsive app. Eclipse actually seemed much more 
> sluggish to me on both windows and Linux.

A lot of Swing problems are due to Really Poor Swing coding--properly 
coded, Swing is fine.

My experience was similar; IDEA seemed quicker than Eclipse; no doubt 
one of those "get what you pay for" type things, although IDEA has been 
around longer, so I'm not terribly surprised, despite Eclipse's use of SWT.

It also seems like the new soon-to-be-released version of IDEA will 
allow even easier plugin development, probably (at least partially) a 
reaction to the Eclipse plugin model. Might have to switch myself, 
especially if I can convince (I have to fight for everything, despite 
metrics etc. that prove I'm right) the powers to invest in some freakin' 
developer tools... *sigh*

Dave



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org