You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Jan Lahoda (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/04 19:33:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LEGAL-390) Using gcc and libstdc++
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jan Lahoda updated LEGAL-390:
-----------------------------
Description:
The NetBeans podling has a component (native Windows launchers) that need to be built using a C/C++ compiler. The current idea for building it is using gcc via MinGW. The component depends on libsdtc++, and also on libgcc, as it is built using gcc. The question is whether we can distribute the binary outcome as a convenience binary under Apache license. Besides the standard license for libstdc++ and libgcc (which I believe is GPLv3), there is also "GCC RUNTIME LIBRARY EXCEPTION":
[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/license.html]
which may allow such distribution.
It has been requested here:
[https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42964768db94cfdfff30970f2300a6e2cf4e558ecd551c1992a774fa@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E]
that:
—
As for libstdc++ which I assume is a required GPL dependency, if you think there is a valid exception it should be documented at
[http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html]
or derived from information found there, or maybe in a LEGAL jira ticket that clarifies things.
—
Thanks for any help!
was:
The NetBeans podling has a component (native Windows launchers) that need to be built using a C/C++ compiler. The current idea for building it is using gcc via MinGW. The component depends on libsdtc++, and also on libgcc, as it is built using gcc. The question is whether we can distribute the binary outcome as a convenience binary under Apache license. Besides the standard license for libstdc++ and libgcc (which I believe is GPLv3), there is also "GCC RUNTIME LIBRARY EXCEPTION":
[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/license.html]
which may allow such distribution.
It has been requested here:
[https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42964768db94cfdfff30970f2300a6e2cf4e558ecd551c1992a774fa@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E]
that:
---
As for libstdc++ which I assume is a required GPL dependency, if you think there is a valid exception it should be documented at
[http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html]
or derived from information found there, or maybe in a LEGAL jira ticket that clarifies things.
---
Thanks for any help!
> Using gcc and libstdc++
> -----------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-390
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-390
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Jan Lahoda
> Priority: Major
>
> The NetBeans podling has a component (native Windows launchers) that need to be built using a C/C++ compiler. The current idea for building it is using gcc via MinGW. The component depends on libsdtc++, and also on libgcc, as it is built using gcc. The question is whether we can distribute the binary outcome as a convenience binary under Apache license. Besides the standard license for libstdc++ and libgcc (which I believe is GPLv3), there is also "GCC RUNTIME LIBRARY EXCEPTION":
> [https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/license.html]
> which may allow such distribution.
> It has been requested here:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42964768db94cfdfff30970f2300a6e2cf4e558ecd551c1992a774fa@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E]
> that:
> —
> As for libstdc++ which I assume is a required GPL dependency, if you think there is a valid exception it should be documented at
> [http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html]
> or derived from information found there, or maybe in a LEGAL jira ticket that clarifies things.
> —
>
> Thanks for any help!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org