You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/11/13 17:04:53 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31067] -
[PATCH] MultipartParser can now handle multipart/mixed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067
[PATCH] MultipartParser can now handle multipart/mixed
------- Additional Comments From javageoff@yahoo.com 2004-11-13 16:04 -------
I've tested the patch locally and it does appear to work, except that the
mulitpart request also needed to be modified to account for the Vector of Parts
which were not being cleaned up at the end of the request. Before I commit I'd
like to look over the patch to understand the changes better.
Geoff
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31067] - [PATCH] MultipartParser can now handle multipart/mixed
Posted by Geoff Howard <ge...@gmail.com>.
Bugzilla is broken the last few times I've cheked, but if anyone is
tracking this issue on the dev list, I've found a problem with this
patch. It causes a parse exception when both a text input and a file
are sent in the same request. I don't have time to track it down
right now - I can send my version of the patch if someone else wants
to work on it.
Geoff
On 13 Nov 2004 16:04:53 -0000, bugzilla@apache.org <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067
>
> [PATCH] MultipartParser can now handle multipart/mixed
>
> ------- Additional Comments From javageoff@yahoo.com 2004-11-13 16:04 -------
> I've tested the patch locally and it does appear to work, except that the
> mulitpart request also needed to be modified to account for the Vector of Parts
> which were not being cleaned up at the end of the request. Before I commit I'd
> like to look over the patch to understand the changes better.
>
> Geoff
>