You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr> on 2001/06/29 15:23:25 UTC
RE: Re[2]: TomcatBook - was TOMCAT SUCKS
>On Friday 29 June 2001 11:41, hische@hadv.nl wrote:
>> A few months ago a project to write a Tomcat book was started (check:
>> http://www.sourgeforge.org search for tomcatbook)
>
><URL:http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcatbook/>
>
>> Haven't heard a lot about it since. Wouldn't it be an good idea to
>> synchronise efforts?
>
>Probably. Apparently 22 people are signed up... can't see how far
>they've got yet, though.
A tomcat book using a GPL licence to cover a tool using Apache Licence ?
A more realist approach could be to move that project to jakarta-tomcat,
or a sub-project like jakarta-tomcat-docs, and may be provide authors
a commiter status ?
What about ?
Re: TomcatBook - was TOMCAT SUCKS
Posted by Andy Armstrong <an...@tagish.com>.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >On Friday 29 June 2001 11:41, hische@hadv.nl wrote:
> >> A few months ago a project to write a Tomcat book was started (check:
> >> http://www.sourgeforge.org search for tomcatbook)
> >
> ><URL:http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcatbook/>
> >
> >> Haven't heard a lot about it since. Wouldn't it be an good idea to
> >> synchronise efforts?
> >
> >Probably. Apparently 22 people are signed up... can't see how far
> >they've got yet, though.
>
> A tomcat book using a GPL licence to cover a tool using Apache Licence ?
>
> A more realist approach could be to move that project to jakarta-tomcat,
> or a sub-project like jakarta-tomcat-docs, and may be provide authors
> a commiter status ?
>
> What about ?
+1 if they're interested.
--
Andy Armstrong, Tagish