You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geode.apache.org by Jason Huynh <jh...@pivotal.io> on 2016/12/05 16:43:49 UTC

Review Request 54382: GEODE-2164: CqNameToOpSingleEntry NAMES_ARRAY field may be refactored out

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54382/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for geode and Dan Smith.


Repository: geode


Description
-------

Changed the names field to be a string[] with a single entry and removed the static field NAMES_ARRAY


Diffs
-----

  geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/ClientUpdateMessageImpl.java a202ba2 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54382/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Jason Huynh


Re: Review Request 54382: GEODE-2164: CqNameToOpSingleEntry NAMES_ARRAY field may be refactored out

Posted by Dan Smith <ds...@pivotal.io>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54382/#review158232
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Dan Smith


On Dec. 5, 2016, 4:43 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54382/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 5, 2016, 4:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode and Dan Smith.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed the names field to be a string[] with a single entry and removed the static field NAMES_ARRAY
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/ClientUpdateMessageImpl.java a202ba2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54382/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>