You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@commons.apache.org by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com> on 2002/10/19 03:43:59 UTC
commons lists
i've added a trailer to all of the lists (you know, 'to unsubscribe..').
question: we have a pmc, cvs, announce, and general list; shouldn't we
have a dev list as well?
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: commons lists
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:10:54PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > When I requested the infrastructure set-up, I asked for general@ because
> > that seemed to be the pattern in use in Jakarta/XML and their commons
> > (sub)projects. We should use either dev@ or general@; I don't have a
> > preference.
>
> disagree. 'dev' is for development discussions (think dev@httpd); 'general'
> is for general discussions, including/especially users (think users@httpd).
Isn't the real issue here whether the Top-level Commons contributors
will be dealing with developmental issues (as in code) or just general
organizational issues (as in which projects to accept, and under what
circumstances)?
I tend to like modeling it after the previously successful Jakarta
Commons project.
-aaron
Re: commons lists
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
Okay this is pedantic, who cares what you name it. I was just stating a
disadvantage (every 1-2 months we have a flamewar with some poor
unsuspecting moron on general@jakarta). Paint the bikeshed yellow with
big bold black letters that say BIKE SHED so that everyone sees it and
knows its function.
-Andy
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 23:10, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > When I requested the infrastructure set-up, I asked for general@ because
> > that seemed to be the pattern in use in Jakarta/XML and their commons
> > (sub)projects. We should use either dev@ or general@; I don't have a
> > preference.
>
> disagree. 'dev' is for development discussions (think dev@httpd); 'general'
> is for general discussions, including/especially users (think users@httpd).
>
> > For CVS modules, we should have 'commons', 'commons-site', and *maybe*
> > 'commons-core'. I'm not sure if we want/need a PMC-private repository.
>
> partially tbd.
> --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
>
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@commons.apache.org
>
--
http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
Java
http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
structure
a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh
Re: commons lists
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > When I requested the infrastructure set-up, I asked for general@ because
> > that seemed to be the pattern in use in Jakarta/XML and their commons
> > (sub)projects. We should use either dev@ or general@; I don't have a
> > preference.
>
> disagree. 'dev' is for development discussions (think dev@httpd); 'general'
> is for general discussions, including/especially users (think users@httpd).
>
people@commons.apache.org or whatever.
Re: commons lists
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> When I requested the infrastructure set-up, I asked for general@ because
> that seemed to be the pattern in use in Jakarta/XML and their commons
> (sub)projects. We should use either dev@ or general@; I don't have a
> preference.
disagree. 'dev' is for development discussions (think dev@httpd); 'general'
is for general discussions, including/especially users (think users@httpd).
> For CVS modules, we should have 'commons', 'commons-site', and *maybe*
> 'commons-core'. I'm not sure if we want/need a PMC-private repository.
partially tbd.
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: commons lists
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:43:59PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> i've added a trailer to all of the lists (you know, 'to unsubscribe..').
> question: we have a pmc, cvs, announce, and general list; shouldn't we
> have a dev list as well?
When I requested the infrastructure set-up, I asked for general@ because
that seemed to be the pattern in use in Jakarta/XML and their commons
(sub)projects. We should use either dev@ or general@; I don't have a
preference.
For CVS modules, we should have 'commons', 'commons-site', and *maybe*
'commons-core'. I'm not sure if we want/need a PMC-private repository.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RE: commons lists
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:Ken.Coar@Golux.Com]
> Sent: 19 October 2002 03:44
> i've added a trailer to all of the lists (you know, 'to unsubscribe..').
> question: we have a pmc, cvs, announce, and general list; shouldn't we
> have a dev list as well?
IMO, yes.
Sander