You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/01/27 02:44:12 UTC

[GitHub] franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue

franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2524#issuecomment-457884054
 
 
   On my box I'm getting the same performance of the master version for single producer/single consumer workloads and a better scalability with 8 producers/8 consumers (on different queues) for both the commits I've attached (the second one, in particular).
   I'm putting this for review and for validation: if anyone has a better machine to validate its behaviour is wellcome.
   
   A conservative approach will suggest to just use the first commit ie a simple q replacement, but I the second commit has more to offer given that would allow to use what this q offer out of the box and that seems very similar to what the thread pool was delivering in the implementation on master.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services