You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Gavin Cato <ga...@corp.nexon.com.au> on 2004/11/05 02:53:30 UTC
Question regarding SA Integration wirg Amavisd-new
Hiya,
I'm just trying this out on a test server.
Is it possible to have amavisd only spamcheck the domains listed in
@local_domains_acl?
I've found that even for domains not listed in that array, that it still
goes and runs the whole spamc checking process, even though it won't add the
spam headers to the email. This doesn't seem overly efficient - particularly
if I put it on a busy server.
Cheers
Gav
Re: Question regarding SA Integration wirg Amavisd-new
Posted by Gavin Cato <ga...@corp.nexon.com.au>.
But that means that no-one would get virus checked.
I want everyone to get AV'd, but not everyone wants to be spam filtered.
Gav
On 6/11/04 2:53 AM, "Kevin Peuhkurinen" <ke...@HEPCOE.com>
wrote:
> It would seem more efficient yet to just have the calling MTA not call
> amavisd for the domains that you don't want checked, wouldn't it?
>
> Gavin Cato wrote:
>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> I'm just trying this out on a test server.
>>
>> Is it possible to have amavisd only spamcheck the domains listed in
>> @local_domains_acl?
>>
>> I've found that even for domains not listed in that array, that it still
>> goes and runs the whole spamc checking process, even though it won't add the
>> spam headers to the email. This doesn't seem overly efficient - particularly
>> if I put it on a busy server.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Gav
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Question regarding SA Integration wirg Amavisd-new
Posted by Kevin Peuhkurinen <ke...@hepcoe.com>.
It would seem more efficient yet to just have the calling MTA not call
amavisd for the domains that you don't want checked, wouldn't it?
Gavin Cato wrote:
>Hiya,
>
>I'm just trying this out on a test server.
>
>Is it possible to have amavisd only spamcheck the domains listed in
>@local_domains_acl?
>
>I've found that even for domains not listed in that array, that it still
>goes and runs the whole spamc checking process, even though it won't add the
>spam headers to the email. This doesn't seem overly efficient - particularly
>if I put it on a busy server.
>
>Cheers
>
>Gav
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>