You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Terry Steichen <te...@net-frame.com> on 2004/05/18 18:56:54 UTC
Re: Sorting Messes up Scores
Tim,
Did these changes actually get incorporated into Lucene? If so, appreciate
it if you could indicate which modules were changed (because I can't find
any changes that appear to address this issue).
Regards,
Terry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Jones" <TJ...@hoovers.com>
To: "'Lucene Developers List'" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Sorting Messes up Scores
> I just committed code changes to fix this. If for any reason you still
see
> a problem, please let me know.
>
> Tim
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Terry Steichen [mailto:terry@net-frame.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:05 AM
> > To: Lucene Developers List
> > Subject: Sorting Messes up Scores
> >
> >
> > When you use the new sorting features, the relevance scores
> > get messed up.
> > (A recent test showed most scores now range up to 3.0 or so.) As Tim
> > suggests below, I'd like to know if fixing this is important
> > to others. (It
> > definitely is to me.) If so, I'll submit it as a bug.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Terry
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Sorting Messes up Scores
Posted by Terry Steichen <te...@net-frame.com>.
Never mind. I see the changes were made in MultiFieldSortedHitQueue (and
the subsequent normalization process in Hits is just, in effect, ignored).
Regards,
Terry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Steichen" <te...@net-frame.com>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Sorting Messes up Scores
> Tim,
>
> Did these changes actually get incorporated into Lucene? If so,
appreciate
> it if you could indicate which modules were changed (because I can't find
> any changes that appear to address this issue).
>
> Regards,
>
> Terry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Jones" <TJ...@hoovers.com>
> To: "'Lucene Developers List'" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Sorting Messes up Scores
>
>
> > I just committed code changes to fix this. If for any reason you still
> see
> > a problem, please let me know.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Terry Steichen [mailto:terry@net-frame.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:05 AM
> > > To: Lucene Developers List
> > > Subject: Sorting Messes up Scores
> > >
> > >
> > > When you use the new sorting features, the relevance scores
> > > get messed up.
> > > (A recent test showed most scores now range up to 3.0 or so.) As Tim
> > > suggests below, I'd like to know if fixing this is important
> > > to others. (It
> > > definitely is to me.) If so, I'll submit it as a bug.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Terry
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org